What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Are people really arguing about by which reason Trump sucks the most? Can't we all just agree that he sucks in a multitude of ways and for multiple reasons with regards to each way?
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

If the executive order was to execute all Canadians upon crossing into the US, should the justice department enforce it?

I mean, it sounds great, but it is likely not lawful.
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Armadillo said:
Christing hell, I just read the White House's statement on Yates. Just say "Acting Attorney General Yates has been relieved of her duties" and move on. But nooooooo...
Click to expand...

My God, was that really the formal White House statement? It wasn't a late night tweet?

Just fit Trump with virtual reality glasses, tell him he's president for the next four years, and bring back Dubya to do it.

Or even Cheney.

I mean, come on.
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

St. Clown said:
Are people really arguing about by which reason Trump sucks the most? Can't we all just agree that he sucks in a multitude of ways and for multiple reasons with regards to each way?
Click to expand...

My coworkers still love him.
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

dxmnkd316 said:
Oh yeah? Well your face is dumb.
Click to expand...

Well I more met Dillo and his need to have Raspberry Frappacino Cosmopolitan Beer with a lime :D

Should we take bets who Trump fires next...the guy is off his rocker!
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Armadillo said:
The answer in such a case is for the AG to resign and go full-frontal. You just can't have an AG refusing to enforce legally-passed laws/orders simply based on personal opinions. That would be anarchy.
Click to expand...

This is not correct. Pulling an Archie is making them fire you. You have each person refuse the order, get fired, and the next man up refuses. You don't make it any easier on them. At least make them spend a bullet.

You need to understand that Trump isn't just being a blowhard, he's actually destroying our democracy, and half the country is fine with it because they're either (1) cynically getting something out of it or (2) fat, drunk, and stupid.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Handyman said:
Well I more met Dillo and his need to have Raspberry Frappacino Cosmopolitan Beer with a lime :D

Should we take bets who Trump fires next...the guy is off his rocker!
Click to expand...

Omg. Yes! It's like a death pool but for politics!
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Handyman said:
Well I more met Dillo and his need to have Raspberry Frappacino Cosmopolitan Beer with a lime :D

Should we take bets who Trump fires next...the guy is off his rocker!
Click to expand...
Whoa whoa whoa.....a lime?! Too far, man, too far. ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

St. Clown said:
Are people really arguing about by which reason Trump sucks the most? Can't we all just agree that he sucks in a multitude of ways and for multiple reasons with regards to each way?
Click to expand...

Oh, he sucks. That doesn't mean that every last little thing he does is worthy of a five-alarm freakout.

And dx: that's not really a good parallel, since this EO doesn't mention murder. A better hypothetical case would be Eric Holder refusing to uphold DACA because he felt it unwise.

Granted, I would REALLY rather laws were changed by legislation than executive order, but apparently that's not what we're gonna do.
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

No, it's a perfect example. If the attorney general feels a law is unlawful or is unenforceable, he or she should do exactly what Yates did

Answer the question.
 
Handyman said:
Well I more met Dillo and his need to have Raspberry Frappacino Cosmopolitan Beer with a lime :D
Click to expand...

So Dillo wants eclectic crafts, and I thought dx liked Sam Adams and Miller Lite?

So what constitutes "good taste in beer" for you, then? :p

"One of these things, is not like the others..."
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

Fine, don't like murder?

Should the attorney general and justice department round up the <strike>Japanese</strike> Muslims and send them to internment camps if the president issues an executive order?
 
Re: POTUS 45.2 - Same arguments, different sides

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
So Dillo wants eclectic crafts, and I thought dx liked Sam Adams and Miller Lite?

So what constitutes "good taste in beer" for you, then? :p

"One of these things, is not like the others..."
Click to expand...

I like them all. Except bud light. That sh_t is gross as ****.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top