What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

This "thinking about others" garbage shall not stand!!! TO THE STREETS!
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Yeah, **** them for trying to be sensitive to an employee and a community.

He has the same name as a long-dead general. That's it. You're basically saying that the area is full of stupid people that might be offended by a common name. Pretty snow-flakey if you ask me. ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

That sure was a well-thought-out rebuttal using reason and intelligence.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I give up.

It's simple:

ESPN over-reacted to a non-issue.
Others then over-reacted to ESPN's over-reaction.
Then still OTHERS over-reacted to the over-reactors.

And that's how we get Trump. Ok, that's not how we really got Trump, but seems to lead down that path no matter what. ;)
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

It's simple:

ESPN over-reacted to a non-issue.
Others then over-reacted to ESPN's over-reaction.
Then still OTHERS over-reacted to the over-reactors.

And that's how we get Trump. Ok, that's not how we really got Trump, but seems to lead down that path no matter what. ;)

Regardless, can we all just agree that it's either Obama or Bush's fault? :)
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Things are ramping up in PHO. CNN, very surprisingly, is not over-reacting to the protestors/speech/situation. Apparently a lot of noise so far, but no violence, thank goodness.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

So, it sounds like the Phoenix rally was the usual. Totally unscripted, still butthurt that he lost the popular vote, still dogwhistling to neo-Nazis ("They're taking away our history and our heritage!"), still promising to "Build the Wall", still whining about "fake news" (lugenpresse - look it up), etc.

EDIT: Oh, and he trashed both McCain and Flake without saying their names, which he said was "very Presidential" :rolleyes:.

You can pretty much read the executive summary, with fact checking, here.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

So, it sounds like the Phoenix rally was the usual. Totally unscripted, still butthurt that he lost the popular vote, still dogwhistling to neo-Nazis ("They're taking away our history and our heritage!"), still promising to "Build the Wall", still whining about "fake news" (lugenpresse - look it up), etc.

That's what I'm gathering.

Frankly, Rs and Ds need to be holed up discussing impeachment. Too bad most of them care about their jobs too much. Build a case, folks. Please.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

So, it sounds like the Phoenix rally was the usual. Totally unscripted, still butthurt that he lost the popular vote, still dogwhistling to neo-Nazis ("They're taking away our history and our heritage!"), still promising to "Build the Wall", still whining about "fake news" (lugenpresse - look it up), etc.

EDIT: Oh, and he trashed both McCain and Flake without saying their names, which he said was "very Presidential" :rolleyes:.

You can pretty much read the executive summary, with fact checking, here.

And a half full room (you can hear him speak in the last second or two
https://twitter.com/davecatanese/status/900197010996772864
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Looks like police are shutting down protesters slowly but surely. It'll be interesting to see the reaction, given that the police (and IMO, rightly so) didn't get involved enough in Charlotte until it was too late.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25


Trump and Bannon are like the Mob...once you make the pact with them you are either in for life or they will cut your throat. (and they are never loyal even though they demand loyalty) Trump should have never brought Bannon on in the first place but the second he chose his idiot SIL (A JEW!!!!!!) over Bannon it was all hands on deck. Bannon is going to have a field day leaking stuff. The amount of money he is going to make Breitbart (and other news agencies) is going to be hilarious. He knows how to push Trump's buttons and he also knows all the dirt...
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Trump and Bannon are like the Mob...once you make the pact with them you are either in for life or they will cut your throat. (and they are never loyal even though they demand loyalty) Trump should have never brought Bannon on in the first place but the second he chose his idiot SIL (A JEW!!!!!!) over Bannon it was all hands on deck. Bannon is going to have a field day leaking stuff. The amount of money he is going to make Breitbart (and other news agencies) is going to be hilarious. He knows how to push Trump's buttons and he also knows all the dirt...

I would agree.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

He knows how to push Trump's buttons

This is the key. Bannon is an execrable human being, but he does understand how the game is played. He's Roger Ailes without the, um, charm?
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

He knows how to push Trump's buttons and he also knows all the dirt...

And what he doesn't know he is willing to make up.

btw. J. Edgar is thought of as the ultimate dirtsmith. What was his rep on making shyt up?
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

By them doing that, they insulted the intelligence of their viewers and they made an issue of something that isn't an issue to begin with.

That the extent of *my* "outrage." I think ESPN should have just let him do the game, and not even bring it up.

Wait, you are "outraged" over the fact that ESPN is allegedly trying to be sensitive to both some viewers and one of it's broadcasters?

Wow.

It's REALLY funny how people get so upset over simple things like "insulting your intelligence" but somehow have difficulty understanding that people get offended by symbols of slavery and opression.

What's up with that?

Is THAT the only reason people are up in arms over this? That's it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top