What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Another great way that con artists are ripping off the GOP gullibles.

tl; dr: The con men publish fake polls showing crazy conservative candidates competitive or ahead. The lemmings believe it and the betting markets move briefly, and the con men move in and buy up positions that have been discounted by the stupidity of the Echo Chamber captive audience.

These people are being milked even harder than the televangelists used to.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Kepler said:
Defarge.

Tracy Flick is the most on-point description of Hillary Clinton that's ever been made. It's up there with Biff Tannen as Trump.
Click to expand...

And yet he wonders why Trump is President....

If you wouldn't mind answering the question about your other sexist nicknames while you're here for trix's sake....
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Kepler said:
I don't wonder at all. It's BECAUSE she is.
Click to expand...

Again Kep, could you please run down your other nicknames? I stepped up and answered trix's question now perhaps you can man up as well and fill in the rest.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Rover said:
Again Kep, could you please run down your other nicknames? I stepped up and answered trix's question now perhaps you can man up as well and fill in the rest.
Click to expand...

"Man up"? Well, um, yes, let's just have a little tour of our sixth grade rhetoric tactics while we're at it.

The nicknames I remember:

Tracy Flick (the metaphysically perfect Hillary Clinton image, summarizing everything about her)

Elizabeth Bathory (hyperbole for giggles, though suggesting the supposed brutal efficiency of the Clintonistas which turned out to be utter ineptitude)

She Who Must Be Obeyed (same as above)

Marie Antoinette (for her sense of pure entitlement and her initial rise to fame by marriage rather than merit)

Her Highness, Her Imperial Splendor, etc (to commemorate the starry-eyed sycophancy of her servile supporters)
Click to expand...

There may have been others, I don't recall them.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Drew S. said:
You guys need to hug it out. Way too much negative energy.
Click to expand...

I've extended him the olive branch many times. He's still stewing, plotting The Grey Lady's return to the throne. Oh sh-t, that was another one! :p
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Drew S. said:
You guys need to hug it out. Way too much negative energy.
Click to expand...

Nah, people on the left need to come to terms with that they've done, for the 2nd time in 16 years. Essentially making the perfect the enemy of the good. Not everybody is going to give you JFK's Inaugural address type chills. Lefties either need to look beyond that and vote for people based on policy, as people on the right do regardless of the inspiration or sanity of the GOP candidate, or they will continue to hand total control of government over to the Republicans.

So, not voting, voting 3rd party, or making sexist nicknames about the candidate will enact or preserve 90% of what you want hands power to the very oligarchs and 1%'ers that the left is fighting against. You would think intelligent, college educated people would make this realization. If they continue to pursue the "my candidate lost not because he had less appeal but because he got cheated" then they need to be called out.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Drew S. said:
I'm not talking strictly about racial stuff. What if anti-trump was considered hate speech or things like that? My point is we should keep a close eye on it and make sure it doesn't creep into other areas.
Click to expand...

Why is it that you, and brent, and joe, can only seem to argue about hypotheticals, things that might happen in your future world controlled by the 'alt-left", and don't seem to have anything noteworthy to say about things that are actually happening?
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

This is honestly a great question. I've gone back and forth on it now like 3 times.

If Donald Trump and Kim Jong-Un had a boxing match, which one dies of a heart attack first?
Click to expand...
 
rufus said:
Why is it that you, and brent, and joe, can only seem to argue about hypotheticals, things that might happen in your future world controlled by the 'alt-left", and don't seem to have anything noteworthy to say about things that are actually happening?
Click to expand...

You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Drew S. said:
You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.
Click to expand...

Wow, now that's an extreme sentiment to be having. Better sit down and have a cold drink before you exhaust yourself. Careful, you might feel a bit faint.
 
Kepler said:
Remember, everyone who raised an objection to Hillary was a SEXIST!!! Even the women, heck, especially the women. Dear Leader can never fail, She can only be failed.

And I'm sure that knee jerk college sophomore identity shtick didn't turn off moderate people one bit... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Not everyone who objected to her was sexist, but a large proportion of them were.

Latent sexism may not receive the press that racism does, but I'd argue it is far more prevalent and socially acceptable.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Drew S. said:
You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.
Click to expand...

Big deal- everyone is.

What you are not answering is why are you limiting hate speech to race?

Nor are you recognizing that words go from "normal" conversation, to "politically correct", to hate speech as people and thinking evolves.

Seems like all you do is keep open lines for bias based on your agenda. And not the agenda who consider others words so hateful.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

unofan said:
Not everyone who objected to her was sexist, but a large proportion of them were.
Click to expand...

On the right, yes. But on the left? No, that seems like Brown University BS to me.

While there is of course sexism everywhere, the left's Puritanical obsession to rake for every last vestige of sin within one's own breast curtails it, while the cocktail party company self-selects it out. Having lost both the Dixiecrats and the Deplorables, there just aren't that many sexists under 60 remaining on the left. It's not good soil for them anymore, particularly when the grass next door in the GOP is so verdant.

The sexism shield was just another self-deluded excuse deployed by the Ministry of Entitlement to explain how their Dear Leader failed to impress anybody without the Clinton chip embedded in their cortex.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I always think it's weird when I see someone still posting anti-Bernie things on Twitter and their page is filled with Hillary stuff (still). Then I remember Rover.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Spartanforlife4 said:
I always think it's weird when I see someone still posting anti-Bernie things on Twitter and their page is filled with Hillary stuff (still). Then I remember Rover.
Click to expand...

I know, right? Ding, dong, dude. Kamala's got the ruby slippers now, try to keep up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top