What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Somewhere Kep, once again, Kellyanne Conway is reading your posts and smiling. You're the kind of liberal her people love. Instead of focusing on what's important (controlling the SCOTUS) its more important to complain about a candidate "wired into the power structure of the party". Good Lord.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Rover said:
Somewhere Kep, once again, Kellyanne Conway is reading your posts and smiling. You're the kind of liberal her people love. Instead of focusing on what's important (controlling the SCOTUS) its more important to complain about a candidate "wired into the power structure of the party". Good Lord.
Click to expand...

As opposed to the guy who always throws his little sniveling jab into every other topic, completely out of the blue.

Get over your butthurt for being exposed on Election Night. If it wasn't for your perpetual pity party we'd all have forgotten your humiliation already.

Your terrible candidate blew it. Stop blaming the voters and start getting behind candidates who don't make Al Gore looked polished and John Kerry look charismatic.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Kepler said:
Get over your butthurt for being exposed on Election Night. If it wasn't for you we'd all have forgotten your humiliation already.

Your terrible candidate blew it. Stop blaming the voters and start getting behind candidates who don't make Al Gore looked polished and John Kerry look charismatic.
Click to expand...

Kep, I think the problem with you is you enjoy losing, or at least you're comfortable with it. Maybe it makes you feel better for making all those sexist comments last year. Regardless, might it be time for you to focus on what's important, now that you've seen the effect of your antics (Trump being elected President)? Maybe "polished" and "charismatic" take a back seat to being right on policy, especially given the opponent wasn't exactly polished or charismatic himself?

Or, is the allure of losing and chalking it up to some vast conspiracy just too hard to resist?

Libs could have overturned Citizens United. They chose to stay home/vote 3rd party. Anybody who did so, or who spent the whole election complaining about their candidate, you got what you deserve. Don't like it? Then learn from it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Handyman said:
And where are we going to get the money for that?
Click to expand...
I know, it's not like having free and fair elections and removing the corrupting power of money from government would profoundly improve our democracy or anything.

Build the Navy 2 more aircraft carriers and make sure Jamie Dimon has enough money to buy Long Island - "just a house in the Hamptons? That's hardly fair, don't you know who I am?" - so he doesn't have to slum it with mere millionaires in Syosset.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

trixR4kids said:
https://twitter.com/YesYoureRacist/status/899811467955974144

Like I said, better to confront and counter protest than merely ignoring them.
Click to expand...

Nah Sicatoka told us better to stand back and let them protest. If we just let them do what they want they wont cause any problems. Just like children...just let them have their way and all will be well!!

$5 says Faux and the White Terrorist Sympathizers will say this is bad because that blocks their freedom of speech or some such nonsense.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

E.J. Smith said:
I know, it's not like having free and fair elections and removing the corrupting power of money from government would profoundly improve our democracy or anything.

Build the Navy 2 more aircraft carriers and make sure Jamie Dimon has enough money to buy Long Island - "just a house in the Hamptons? That's hardly fair, don't you know who I am?" - so he doesn't have to slum it with mere millionaires in Syosset.
Click to expand...

To be fair, Syosset sucks. But he strikes me as far more of a Manhasset man.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

E.J. Smith said:
I know, it's not like having free and fair elections and removing the corrupting power of money from government would profoundly improve our democracy or anything.

Build the Navy 2 more aircraft carriers and make sure Jamie Dimon has enough money to buy Long Island - "just a house in the Hamptons? That's hardly fair, don't you know who I am?" - so he doesn't have to slum it with mere millionaires in Syosset.
Click to expand...

For the record I am all for it. (along with a controlled time for campaigning) Problem is money for public elections will come from taxes and people hate paying taxes. They will hate it even more if the those taxes go to funding the campaign of the "other side". Not to mention our budget is a mess...

The other thing is, do you want Congress to control how much money goes into the campaign? Can you imagine what they would do for the upcoming elections? They would slash public funding all over the place because they have the seats.
 
Handyman said:
Nah Sicatoka told us better to stand back and let them protest. If we just let them do what they want they wont cause any problems. Just like children...just let them have their way and all will be well!!

$5 says Faux and the White Terrorist Sympathizers will say this is bad because that blocks their freedom of speech or some such nonsense.
Click to expand...

I feel like those same people were annoyed at the Dakota pipeline protesters and were just fine with seeing the water cannons used on veterans!
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

It's ("drain the swamp") clearly just an empty slogan. Chasing specifics would seem a waste of time. No Trumpeter is going to admit, "okay, you got me, I'll vote better next time."
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

geezer said:
It's ("drain the swamp") clearly just an empty slogan. Chasing specifics would seem a waste of time. No Trumpeter is going to admit, "okay, you got me, I'll vote better next time."
Click to expand...

The reason I bring it up is that THEY bring it up. As if they know what it really means.

I'd like to know what it really means- should I support it or not?
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

geezer said:
That was awesome. I used to have zero respect for Tucker, but then he pulled out the masterful Chuck Norris joke troll on his own audience. Well done sir, my respect is boosted to "will **** on to extinguish fire."
Click to expand...

Dude went to St. George's and Trinity, so he's in the running for Upper Class Twit of the Year, but even he treats the Deplorables like a cross between leprosy and NASCAR.

Best part is the fools will never understand they were being mocked. That's A-level trolling, like Reagan on the fundies.

Meanwhile, Dumpy continues his drive to murder everyone who voted for him.

Trump administration officials have told the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine to halt a review of the increased public health risks faced by Appalachian residents who live near mountaintop removal coal-mining sites, the academies revealed in a statement issued Monday.

Word of the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement order was disclosed by the academies just hours before the scientific panel conducting the study was scheduled to hear from coalfield residents at a public meeting Monday evening in Hazard, Kentucky, and then hold two days of business meetings in Lexington.
Click to expand...

Hazard is the seat of Perry County, Kentucky, which went for Trump 80/20.
 
Last edited:
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

More best people: https://www.advocate.com/politics/2...sam-clovis-links-marriage-equality-pedophilia

Donald Trump has come up with another horrendously anti-LGBT nominee for a high government position — this time, a man who has argued that legalization of same-sex marriage will lead to legalization of pedophilia. Plus he’s a birther and a climate change denier.

Sam Clovis is Trump’s nominee to be undersecretary for research, education, and economics in the U.S. Department of Agriculture — the department’s chief scientist. He is currently senior White House adviser to the USDA.

He was nominated in July and awaits confirmation by the Senate, but his anti-LGBT record was scrutinized in a CNN article published Monday, based on research by the news channel’s KFile investigative team. A previous KFile investigation revealed his embrace of birtherism and his skepticism about climate change.

Clovis took these stands during his time as a talk show host, blogger, activist, and political candidate in Iowa. He was a professor of business administration at Morningside College in Sioux City until last year, and for a time he hosted a talk show called Impact With Sam Clovis on radio station KSCJ in that city, notes the Sioux City Journal. He ran for the Republican nomination for U.S. senator from Iowa in 2014, and he also sought the position of state treasurer. The comments documented by CNN are mostly from 2012 through 2014.

In a YouTube video from the time of his unsuccessful Senate campaign, Clovis is shown in a coffee shop, saying, “Someone who engages in LGBT behavior, sometimes — you know, and I don’t know what the science is on this, I think it’s still out — but as far as I, that we know, that is a choice they make, right. So we’re being asked to provide constitutional protections for behavior, a choice in behavior as opposed to a primary characteristic.”

He added, “If we protect LGBT behavior, what other behaviors are we going to protect? Are we going to protect pedophilia? Are we going to protect polyamorous marriage relationships? Are we going to protect people who have fetishes? I mean, what’s the logical extension of this?” He also said religion is under assault.
Click to expand...
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
I feel like those same people were annoyed at the Dakota pipeline protesters and were just fine with seeing the water cannons used on veterans!
Click to expand...

Oh they hated the Pipeline people...some of them flat out defended their treatment around here both passively and aggressively. Amazingly they didnt have the same opinion for the White Terrorists...I wonder why that is.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

geezer said:
It's ("drain the swamp") clearly just an empty slogan. Chasing specifics would seem a waste of time. No Trumpeter is going to admit, "okay, you got me, I'll vote better next time."
Click to expand...

Originally it meant he was going to get rid of the money people in charge (remember his wanting to get rid of Goldman Sachs People) and get things more efficient. That didnt even last until December.

He fleeced people into thinking he was going to cause a phase shift in Washington, then fleeced them again by telling them he wasnt serious and they knew it. He convinced what 35% of the population (according to polls) that he was going to do something, then failed to do it, then did the opposite and that they KNEW he was going to do the opposite so he actually did what they wanted him to do!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top