What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

The Bannon thing has been a lock for a while. I believe WaPo was floating the rumor last week. His little interview after Charlottesville was the proof.

Trumpy better cough up something pretty big or Breitbart News and anyone else who loves Bannon is going to turn on him. He just picked to support a Jew over his racist.

The President did say he thinks Bannon is a good man and not a racist...
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Handyman said:
The Bannon thing has been a lock for a while. I believe WaPo was floating the rumor last week. His little interview after Charlottesville was the proof.

Trumpy better cough up something pretty big or Breitbart News and anyone else who loves Bannon is going to turn on him. He just picked to support a Jew over his racist.

The President did say he thinks Bannon is a good man and not a racist...
Click to expand...

Ever since Kelly was brought on board it was a lock, I think.

I'm just not sure it changes anything. Bannon wasn't the one who said "both sides" it was Trump. Then again, with one less racist hand up his azz, maybe the dummy stops saying racist things...?
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

LOL

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here at arbys we'd like to welcome steve bannon back to his old job: sleeping in our dumpster & barfing up gin in our parking lot<br>Eat arbys</p>— Nihilist Arby's (@nihilist_arbys) <a href="https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/898593667082067971">August 18, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Handyman said:
The Bannon thing has been a lock for a while. I believe WaPo was floating the rumor last week. His little interview after Charlottesville was the proof.

Trumpy better cough up something pretty big or Breitbart News and anyone else who loves Bannon is going to turn on him. He just picked to support a Jew over his racist.

The President did say he thinks Bannon is a good man and not a racist...
Click to expand...
I really don't think Bannon is the racist part of any equation with regards to Trump's actions. Reporters have Bannon giving his outlook on the racist demonstrators, and he wasn't kind to them at all. Either he agreed with their ultimate sentiment, but thought them foolish in their execution, or he didn't agree with them at all. Regardless, he was advising Hair Furor to denounce them unequivocally.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

fadetoblack&gold said:
lol

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">here at arbys we'd like to welcome steve bannon back to his old job: Sleeping in our dumpster & barfing up gin in our parking lot<br>eat arbys</p>— nihilist arby's (@nihilist_arbys) <a href="https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/898593667082067971">august 18, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

all part of his genius master plan
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

St. Clown said:
I really don't think Bannon is the racist part of any equation with regards to Trump's actions. Reporters have Bannon giving his outlook on the racist demonstrators, and he wasn't kind to them at all. Either he agreed with their ultimate sentiment, but thought them foolish in their execution, or he didn't agree with them at all. Regardless, he was advising Hair Furor to denounce them unequivocally.
Click to expand...

Bannon is a racist...he wouldnt run you over with his car or be on the front line crying while being maced but he is a full on racist and it has been common knowledge since his days at Breitbart. He is the reason the racist flocked to Trump.

Speaking of friends of Trump Watch This Clown Get Owned on MSNBC
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

mookie1995 said:
one side was saying whites are superior. the other says we know that and love the darkies and want to take care of them.


where's the difference?

rich people play "one" side off "another" so nobody goes after them. black v white. christian v muslim. straight v gay. life v choice.
anything to create noise and divert attention. been going on since people with the most rocks were the rich. ain't changing anytime soon.
Click to expand...

Wait, you think this is only about race?

Really?

Is that what you think BLM is about, too?

There's one glaring difference between the two- one side is fighting to get all of the rights that the law gives them- so that everyone is equal under the law. The other side if fighting to take that away.

There's a MASSIVE moral difference in the two groups because of that.

It's *barely* been 50 years since the law made everyone equal, and that it was against the law to deny something due to their race. It's been just over a year since LBGT have been given the equal right that they can be married.

We pretend that we are a country of rights, but until we all have the same rights, and we are treated equally to the law- NOT BIASED- then we still have work to do.

It's too bad that you can't see that. Or want to deny it.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

jerphisch said:
The entire President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities have resigned, and their letter of resignation would seem to indicate they have completely run out of fux to give.
Click to expand...

Trumpists: "Why was Trump funding such a libtard committee of self-important Hollywood actors anyway?!?!"

Oblivious to the fact that it was started in 1982, by St. Ronald of Cielo. :D
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Handyman said:
That...is...AMAZING!
Click to expand...

The best part was the initial paragraph letters spelling RESIST. Ha! Sadly, Trump probably could not care less since he cut their funding anyway. Still, good job by them. I noticed on the letterhead that Melania is the honorary chairman.

Also - the question for me is...did Bannon resign or was he fired? Saw two different tweets about it. Or did he "resign?"
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Scarlet said:
The best part was the initial paragraph letters spelling RESIST. Ha! Sadly, Trump probably could not care less since he cut their funding anyway. Still, good job by them. I noticed on the letterhead that Melania is the honorary chairman.

Also - the question for me is...did Bannon resign or was he fired? Saw two different tweets about it. Or did he "resign?"
Click to expand...

The report that I saw was that Bannon and Kelly came to a "mutual decision" that today would be his last with the White House.
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Scarlet said:
The best part was the initial paragraph letters spelling RESIST. Ha! Sadly, Trump probably could not care less since he cut their funding anyway. Still, good job by them. I noticed on the letterhead that Melania is the honorary chairman.

Also - the question for me is...did Bannon resign or was he fired? Saw two different tweets about it. Or did he "resign?"
Click to expand...

Artists can be creative, it turns out. :)
 
Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Not surprising. Unfortunately, Wonkette "articles" read like one of Rover's posts. Which is to say, they make Kepler's diatribes look modest. :)
Click to expand...

Hence why I said "watch" I never read Wonkette cause it makes me hate everyone and everything :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top