Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: POTUS 45.16 - If Never Forgotten, One Would ALWAYS Remember Something.
Agreed on Schumer. He and Pelosi are both excellent tacticians. They don't have an overarching strategy but that is rarely driven by Congressional leadership -- it's either something that rises from the grassroots (Occupy, Bernie) or is injected by the presidential nominee (Obama's Hopey Change stuff).
We do need to give the voters something to get excited about. While the truth is there has to be a unified course change for the US across all policies, the political and psychological reality is that has to be embodied is a few high profile, easily understood policies. We have to stop the wall, but our banner can't just be "Stop the Wall!" It has to be something like "bring ALL Americans in from the cold and under the protection and also the responsibilities of citizenship." All the good people being roughed up by the ICE SS are going to make for plangent case studies and examples (and ads).
You and I disagree on whether we should stress economic justice -- I believe a return to the overall tax philosophy pre-JFK is the key driver of American economic growth, the health of the middle class, and the decimation of the 1% parasites, and I also believe it will resonate with most voters, even some who voted for Trump out of anger and powerlessness. But we can at least agree that an absolute "no" to tax cuts for the wealthy is the sine qua non.
Finally I'm going to make a lot of people unhappy by saying we should drop the litmus tests for reproductive rights and gun control. I am fully committed to strengthening both, but I prefer to have blue dog Dems in red states who vote with us sometimes than straight ticket Republicans. We get into trouble with the blue dogs only when we cater to them. My strategy is we allow non-socially-liberal candidates to run and win as Dems and we support them against any opposition from the right, but that's it. We don't horse trade with them, and we always try to primary them. But come the general we try to pick up and hold seats.
Dems are correct on taxes for once. 1) No tax cuts for the rich, and 2) it has to be paid for. This basically gives cover to the Dems in vulnerable seats as most Americans actually agree with this and its clear and concise. Let Goopers tear themselves apart between bought and paid for corp types (Ryan) and nationalists (Bannon). I believe Schumer made that statement and I have to say the guy has surprised me so far in that he's been a far better Senate leader of the Dems than I ever expected.
Agreed on Schumer. He and Pelosi are both excellent tacticians. They don't have an overarching strategy but that is rarely driven by Congressional leadership -- it's either something that rises from the grassroots (Occupy, Bernie) or is injected by the presidential nominee (Obama's Hopey Change stuff).
We do need to give the voters something to get excited about. While the truth is there has to be a unified course change for the US across all policies, the political and psychological reality is that has to be embodied is a few high profile, easily understood policies. We have to stop the wall, but our banner can't just be "Stop the Wall!" It has to be something like "bring ALL Americans in from the cold and under the protection and also the responsibilities of citizenship." All the good people being roughed up by the ICE SS are going to make for plangent case studies and examples (and ads).
You and I disagree on whether we should stress economic justice -- I believe a return to the overall tax philosophy pre-JFK is the key driver of American economic growth, the health of the middle class, and the decimation of the 1% parasites, and I also believe it will resonate with most voters, even some who voted for Trump out of anger and powerlessness. But we can at least agree that an absolute "no" to tax cuts for the wealthy is the sine qua non.
Finally I'm going to make a lot of people unhappy by saying we should drop the litmus tests for reproductive rights and gun control. I am fully committed to strengthening both, but I prefer to have blue dog Dems in red states who vote with us sometimes than straight ticket Republicans. We get into trouble with the blue dogs only when we cater to them. My strategy is we allow non-socially-liberal candidates to run and win as Dems and we support them against any opposition from the right, but that's it. We don't horse trade with them, and we always try to primary them. But come the general we try to pick up and hold seats.