FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
That 5.7 million people committing voter fraud figure was cited by Trump not Harvard lmao.
But remember, Flag didn't vote for him.

That 5.7 million people committing voter fraud figure was cited by Trump not Harvard lmao.
This. I would add more locations to #2 where IDs could be obtained, but this is an extremely fair way to ensure that all voters are legally allowed to do so.
Ultimately, there is zero actual proof of mass voter fraud. There are a lot of people that like to point to irregularities in voter registration, but I have never seen any actual proof showing a connection between irregularities in voter registration and mass voter fraud. Hell, several of the people in Trump's administration were found to have been registered in multiple states.
But remember, Flag didn't vote for him.![]()
That is cause there is none. The proof the Right even cites usually says within it that there is no actual proof they just ignore those sentences.
The only voter fraud going on in large quantities is voter suppression and only one party is doing it. Of course when did the modern Republican Party ever care about Blacks or the Poor?
He's still my President. Just like how Schumer's one of my Senators. As much as some may not like their representation, they still are. And considering a few of the morons on here have been wanting to out Trump since before he even took office, it's time to quit the sour grapes.
For the love of God stop engaging the Fraudbot. You arent changing his mind or really anyone's mind and in reality you are just making yourself look stupid.
And please stop quoting him.
So the study wasn't Harvard, it was deeply flawed, you were wrong. Time to talk about something else!He's still my President. Just like how Schumer's one of my Senators. As much as some may not like their representation, they still are. And considering a few of the morons on here have been wanting to out Trump since before he even took office, it's time to quit the sour grapes.
Christ dude... you don't need to overcompensate for the fact that you told the entire board for a year that Trump had no chance and Hillary would win. And now you still can't explain what happened or even be bothered to learn from it (everyone else should do that!).So, while I completely agree with all the voter suppression outrage out here, its not like the Republicans didn't telegraph what they were going to do on this subject for the past several years now. Is this a good time to ask how many people who are now bringing this up voted 3rd party or didn't vote in the last election, under the guise that I guess Clinton/Dems would be suppressing the vote just as much as Trump/GOP?![]()
Barack Obama was, as president, eloquent. His language was sophisticated. He spoke in measured tones and advanced informed, reasoned dialogue.
Donald Trump is inarticulate and brusque. His language is simplistic. He dishes out invective. He shows so little regard for the facts that some say he’s the exemplar of a “bull**** artist.” And he promotes a dialogue of the deaf.
The differences between Trump’s and Obama’s rhetorical styles seem stark. Yet, when we set aside the presidents’ speaking styles and looked more carefully at the specific words Trump employed in his first months in office, we were surprised to discover that, in certain ways, these two presidents are remarkably like each other and unlike their predecessors. Here’s what we found – and why Obama and Trump have more in common than you would think.
Can someone please remind the whole Trump staff that the video game series Fallout is NOT to be used as a roadmap?That half of republicans surveyed would support "postponement" of a vote should be just about the most alarming thing we've heard in recent years. That 100% of them don't believe postponing elections is an absolutely abhorrent idea tells us we should all be very afraid of what the future is bringing. The gulf between nearly everyone identifying as a republican and the rest of the electorate keeps getting worse. The final outcome is going to be unpleasant. And yes, unpleasant is a euphemism. When a sizeable number of people in a society feel it is right to take away the rights of EVERYONE to vote and they go up against another equally sizable portion of people who realize how evil, stupid and ridiculous that notion is, the outcome is usually going to be war.
Why is it when anyone connected with the Clinton presidency, or Obama's, or Hillary's campaign so much as farts in a grocery store aisle, those on the right scream bloody murder, yet when a couple of trump staffers, one married with 2 children already, create a little republican love child, there isn't a peep? Oh yeah, its because they are all a bunch of pathetic hypocrites. I keep forgetting about that.
Why is it when anyone connected with the Clinton presidency, or Obama's, or Hillary's campaign so much as farts in a grocery store aisle, those on the right scream bloody murder, yet when a couple of trump staffers, one married with 2 children already, create a little republican love child, there isn't a peep? Oh yeah, its because they are all a bunch of pathetic hypocrites. I keep forgetting about that.
"On this episode of, As the Stomach Turns..."
I've seen the Delgado woman on various news shows before.
This couple is lucky that Pennsylvania repealed their adultery law in 1972. Otherwise they would be facing misdemeanor charge against them.We need more children in the country with good genes and this helps address that problem.