POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

LOL. Sayeth the embodiment of tertiary syphilis.

Don't forget the rat in his face.

 

[St. Clown]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

You need to put a little warning before this stuff. I almost spit chocolate lilk all over the keyboard.

How long do you think it takes to jury rig those little tidbits? I watched/listened to both the hearings live and have a friend who could be a Breitbot telling me there is no Russian influence (could be a Flaggy clone, they obviously are drinking the same Koolaid, have almost identical responses). I can get ignoring the Dems but a couple of the GOP big wigs came out and asked about Russia and both Comey (the Satan) and Sessions (the Trump mouthpiece) said this was a significant problem that shouldn't be ignored. That it was bad it was being lost in the Trump hunt. How does one reconcile a paranoid hatred of the Commies/Russia 12 months ago to the Russians will give us evidence they are innocent/ I see nothing? That has to be the most significant flip flop in all of politics and I can't figure out how they overcame the extreme paranoia to convince them to see nothing so fast.

Here's the kicker to that: If the Russians have evidence that they did not hack the election results in favor of Trump, it means that the Russians have evidence that they've done something in relation to the US presidential vote and that Trump and/or his election team had knowledge of it. Otherwise there's no evidence that could possibly be provided. His guys put themselves in a Catch 22 position by even stating that.

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

You need to put a little warning before this stuff. I almost spit chocolate lilk all over the keyboard.

How long do you think it takes to jury rig those little tidbits? I watched/listened to both the hearings live and have a friend who could be a Breitbot telling me there is no Russian influence (could be a Flaggy clone, they obviously are drinking the same Koolaid, have almost identical responses). I can get ignoring the Dems but a couple of the GOP big wigs came out and asked about Russia and both Comey (the Satan) and Sessions (the Trump mouthpiece) said this was a significant problem that shouldn't be ignored. That it was bad it was being lost in the Trump hunt. How does one reconcile a paranoid hatred of the Commies/Russia 12 months ago to the Russians will give us evidence they are innocent/ I see nothing? That has to be the most significant flip flop in all of politics and I can't figure out how they overcame the extreme paranoia to convince them to see nothing so fast.

When you spend all of the pre-election cycle telling "GOP whiners" that there's no foreign influence in the elections, and then all of a sudden there is when you lose, anyone with half an amount of common sense can tell that it's just sour grapes of you losing, and you're desperate to do anything to reverse it. Let us know when you're ready to accept the election results.

 

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

When you spend all of the pre-election cycle telling "GOP whiners" that there's no foreign influence in the elections, and then all of a sudden there is when you lose, anyone with half an amount of common sense can tell that it's just sour grapes of you losing, and you're desperate to do anything to reverse it. Let us know when you're ready to accept the election results.

"Shut up", he explained.

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Robert Mueller angers Republicans. Continues to do his job.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller just signed up another recruit to help with his ongoing investigation into alleged Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election.

Next on-board the investigative juggernaut–which now includes a total of 13 attorneys and counting–is Elizabeth Prelogar, an assistant with the solicitor general’s office who is apparently fluent in the Russian language.

As an undergrad at Emory College, Prelogar majored in English and Russian and then received a Fulbright grant to study in Russia as a graduate student where, in conjunction with an Overseas Press Club scholarship, she focused on Russian media and censorship before starting law school at Harvard.

Later on, Prelogar served as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. So far, she’s argued five cases in front of the nation’s highest court, spanning multiple areas of law.

According to one-time solicitor general Donald Verrilli Jr., in comments to the National Law Journal on Monday: “Like Michael Dreeben, [Prelogar] is a person of superb intellect and deep integrity. She can be counted on to call it as she sees it.”

Not specialized in any particular area, Prelogar’s role in the Russia probe will be to serve as an assistant to Michael Dreeben, a criminal law expert recently tapped by Mueller for clarity on obstruction of justice charges.

And who is Michael Dreeben, I hear you ask?

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has reached out to the Justice Department’s deputy solicitor general Michael Dreeben, in an effort to understand some of the complex issues of law that have come up so far in the Russia investigation–including what “obstruction of justice” might look like under the circumstances.

Said to be the Justice Department’s top criminal law attorney, and admired on both sides of the aisle for his encyclopedic knowledge of the subject, Dreeben is the point person for such questions and a natural choice for the job.

Walter Dellinger, a law professor at Duke, said: “Michael [Dreeben] is the most brilliant and most knowledgeable federal criminal lawyer in America — period.”

So there's that.

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

LOL. The Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight strikes again.

Donald Trump's nominee to be the director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, represented an American energy executive in 2006 who was being criminally investigated by the Russian government.

The detail, which was included on Wray's biography on the website of the law firm King and Spalding dating back to 2009, was removed in 2017, according to a KFile review of the Web Archive.

A copy of Wray's biography from the law firm King and Spalding archived in December 2016 noted that Wray had represented "an energy company president in a criminal investigation by Russian authorities." By June of this year, that information had been removed. The line appears to be the one of few bits of information ever removed from the page since 2009

 

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

When you spend all of the pre-election cycle telling "GOP whiners" that there's no foreign influence in the elections, and then all of a sudden there is when you lose, anyone with half an amount of common sense can tell that it's just sour grapes of you losing, and you're desperate to do anything to reverse it. Let us know when you're ready to accept the election results.

When did anyone say to GOP whiners that there's no foreign influence?

You seem to be just like your favorite news- make stuff up.

And it's nice to see people who used to be the stand up, anti-commie people tell us that any investigation into Russia is just sour grapes. That's got to be one of the most lame excuses to just blindly accept any indications that the Russians have tried to hack into the system. So what if they had zero impact- just the fact that they tried should bother EVERYONE, even idiots like you and alex.

You can look yourself in the mirror and call yourself an American? After so many decades being on the brink with the same people running russia today?? No problem with that?

Do you not see that the election is STILL GOING TO STAND? Unless don actually did something that was grounds for impeachment. And if he did, that doesn't bother you?

 

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

When did anyone say to GOP whiners that there's no foreign influence?

You seem to be just like your favorite news- make stuff up.

And it's nice to see people who used to be the stand up, anti-commie people tell us that any investigation into Russia is just sour grapes. That's got to be one of the most lame excuses to just blindly accept any indications that the Russians have tried to hack into the system. So what if they had zero impact- just the fact that they tried should bother EVERYONE, even idiots like you and alex.

You can look yourself in the mirror and call yourself an American? After so many decades being on the brink with the same people running russia today?? No problem with that?

Do you not see that the election is STILL GOING TO STAND? Unless don actually did something that was grounds for impeachment. And if he did, that doesn't bother you?

Here, I'll even give it to you from someone approved by the propaganda machine, and look who even said it: http://www.npr.org/2016/08/04/488688926/president-obama-the-election-will-not-be-rigged

And considering you were trying to get him impeached before he even took office, so there couldn't possibly be crimes while he's President because he wasn't yet, that speaks even more volumes than what I just cited.

Oh, and about your talking about us being on the brink with Russia, I'd like to quote Barack Hussein Obama during the 2012 campaign: "The 1980's called, they'd like their foreign policy back."

 

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

You need to put a little warning before this stuff. I almost spit chocolate lilk all over the keyboard.

How long do you think it takes to jury rig those little tidbits? I watched/listened to both the hearings live and have a friend who could be a Breitbot telling me there is no Russian influence (could be a Flaggy clone, they obviously are drinking the same Koolaid, have almost identical responses). I can get ignoring the Dems but a couple of the GOP big wigs came out and asked about Russia and both Comey (the Satan) and Sessions (the Trump mouthpiece) said this was a significant problem that shouldn't be ignored. That it was bad it was being lost in the Trump hunt. How does one reconcile a paranoid hatred of the Commies/Russia 12 months ago to the Russians will give us evidence they are innocent/ I see nothing? That has to be the most significant flip flop in all of politics and I can't figure out how they overcame the extreme paranoia to convince them to see nothing so fast.

According to the True Believers neither party is immune to the evil. They are all Globalists paid off by the Bilderburgs or whatever. The Dems just get double paid by Soros

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

According to the True Believers neither party is immune to the evil. They are all Globalists paid off by the Bilderburgs or whatever. The Dems just get double paid by Soros

Well of course; we have more Jews. The goyim? Even in internationalist cabals they have to pay retail.

 

[leswp1]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

When you spend all of the pre-election cycle telling "GOP whiners" that there's no foreign influence in the elections, and then all of a sudden there is when you lose, anyone with half an amount of common sense can tell that it's just sour grapes of you losing, and you're desperate to do anything to reverse it. Let us know when you're ready to accept the election results.

First- who is the you telling GOP whiners there is no foreign influence? Completely confused. It looks like you are saying the GOP guys, who are on the committees responsible for defending out country, looking into possible espionage are having sour grapes even tho they are in control of the Senate and the House- they are making up things. This isn't about just the election results. That happened awhile ago. The evidence coming out now includes other countries, not just our own.

I think you seem to be blaming one side for saying there was no influence, when the evidence for the influence is uncovered then we are supposed to ignore it because the side that was maligned for saying it wasn't there must have been right?

Here, I'll even give it to you from someone approved by the propaganda machine, and look who even said it: http://www.npr.org/2016/08/04/488688926/president-obama-the-election-will-not-be-rigged

And considering you were trying to get him impeached before he even took office, so there couldn't possibly be crimes while he's President because he wasn't yet, that speaks even more volumes than what I just cited.

Oh, and about your talking about us being on the brink with Russia, I'd like to quote Barack Hussein Obama during the 2012 campaign: "The 1980's called, they'd like their foreign policy back."

2016 was a very long time ago. Life goes on, discovery continues. Until they come out and say the investigation is completed I have a hard time pretending something from last yr is the proof needed for a decision.

Sorry, I am sure so much logic is against the rules. I just don't get it. I am not sure what my opinion is about whether Trump actually was involved (truly). I think he is dumber than a box of hammers but sly as a fox. I can see him going along with things but his record of being a complete failure at business and inability for following thru on anything makes me struggle to see him capable of much of what people think he did.

 

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Here, I'll even give it to you from someone approved by the propaganda machine, and look who even said it: http://www.npr.org/2016/08/04/488688926/president-obama-the-election-will-not-be-rigged

And considering you were trying to get him impeached before he even took office, so there couldn't possibly be crimes while he's President because he wasn't yet, that speaks even more volumes than what I just cited.

Oh, and about your talking about us being on the brink with Russia, I'd like to quote Barack Hussein Obama during the 2012 campaign: "The 1980's called, they'd like their foreign policy back."

And this was AFTER don said the election was going to be rigged. don was the only one to accuse that. Or are you to illiterate to read that in the very article you posted?

You should WANT a russia investigation, even if don isn't involved. You pretend to be anti-globalist, but don't want to look into a different country attempting to do something to our elections? Your head is so far up your butt, a glass belly button doesn't even work anymore.

Given that don has some incredibly obvious conflicts of interests, some that pretty clearly cover constitutional items that he pretends still don't apply- of course I wanted him impeached. AGAIN, for you specifically- the emoluments clause covers foreign money influencing the President. For a anti-globalist like you claim to be- that should be alarming. Your neck is starting to show the strain.

Do you honestly think we should be friends with russia all of a sudden? Do you forget that vald used to be a high member of the KGB? And he's taken a dump all over human rights for not only his own countrymen, but anywhere he's gone? You are ok if countries ignore their borders and move into their neighbor's houses???

Guys like you make me very pessimistic about our future. Logic is 100% lost.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Despite being schooled on the subject numerous times, Flaggy still can't differentiate between 'rigged', meaning the outcome is assured, and 'influenced', meaning tactics were applied to reach the desired outcome, whether successful or not.

 

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Don't forget the rat in his face.

OMG. I cannot unsee that.

 

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Flaggy is our village idiot, and though he is eternally frustrating in his ignorance and gullibility, we would probably stand up for him if neighboring villagers tried to bully him. He's also useful as an example of the kind of person who can simultaneously believe that Sandy Hook never happened and that Ping Pong Pizza did.

 

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Why do people insist on quoting flaggy? Makes my ignoring him far less effective. Flaggy, like all who are of his persuasion, lies. Constantly. They lie when the truth will help them. It isn't a mistake. It is a tactic. Just keep repeating the outrageous lie and people might end up believing it. Those who employ this tactic don't care that they are lying. After all, they're liars. So it is a win for them. If someone eventually falls for the lie repeated time and again, that is a huge win. If not, what do they care? After all, they are liars.

When somebody like Flaggy lies, it is sad and pathetic and I can't figure out why they do it. When the trumps of the world lie, at least I know they are doing it because they don't care about the rest of us and are simply looking to enrich themselves. If there is a Hell, it has a nice corner for the likes of trump. I really want to believe that.

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

They lie when the truth will help them. It isn't a mistake. It is a tactic. Just keep repeating the outrageous lie and people might end up believing it. Those who employ this tactic don't care that they are lying. After all, they're liars. So it is a win for them. If someone eventually falls for the lie repeated time and again, that is a huge win. If not, what do they care? After all, they are liars.

This is why I wonder, in all seriousness, why the media even reports what Trump says. It does not matter. Literally. It's just mouth gush from a power sprayer of lies. It means zero.

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Sessions gets a lawyer -- the guy who got his as-s handed to him defending Prop 8 before SCOTUS.

So much winning.

 

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

This is why I wonder, in all seriousness, why the media even reports what Trump says. It does not matter. Literally. It's just mouth gush from a power sprayer of lies. It means zero.

I call pants-on-fire.

Not in all seriousness. You know the clown show sells.

 

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

I call pants-on-fire.

Not in all seriousness. You know the clown show sells.

Touche.