What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Did I just say it takes an interpreter to understand Trump? :D

Or a child psychologist.

We elected a duck President, and now everybody is trying to analyze the nuance and what he really means when he quacks.

No. He doesn't mean anything. He's just a f-cking duck.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

It's actually not a bad idea, even NOT taking the health care bill into account. The Baby Boom generation is going to pass on in the next few years....that's a LOT of people....

Seems like an industry that would be somewhat recession proof, too. Heck...a recession/depression might actually spur business.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Seems like an industry that would be somewhat recession proof, too. Heck...a recession/depression might actually spur business.

Ah yes, (these should be in the bad puns thread), business is always dead but people are still dying to meet you.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

It's getting to the point now where something substantial better be found on the Trump Campaign and Russia. Or it ends up being another Benghazi, but run by the Democrats. And Democrats don't run BS investigations as good as the Republicans do.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Ah yes, (these should be in the bad puns thread), business is always dead but people are still dying to meet you.

Why did the funeral director decide to retire?

His business was dying.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

It's getting to the point now where something substantial better be found on the Trump Campaign and Russia. Or it ends up being another Benghazi, but run by the Democrats. And Democrats don't run BS investigations as good as the Republicans do.

Script flip.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Good lord his thoughts literally destroy braincells...

What the heck country do we live in? I mean seriously...this clown not only won the election but right now I would put the odds pretty high he gets a second term.

Twitter:Humanity::Trump:Politics
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Was thinking over the weekend as I skimmed over pieces about the health-lack-of-care bill that young kids should look at becoming funeral home owners. That is one industry that will be getting a huge increase over the next decade or so.
That is cold. Only problem I see is a lot of them will not be able to afford being buried
And emergency room docs and staff and collection agencies.
Only if you are a masochist. That is going to be 15 kinds of hell. No one in their right mind wants to work in that- No matter what they do they aren't going to be able to increase the capacity enough to handle what is coming.

Or a child psychologist.

We elected a duck President, and now everybody is trying to analyze the nuance and what he really means when he quacks.

No. He doesn't mean anything. He's just a f-cking duck.
Not this either- they don't reimburse for psych stuff to begin with and that will be totally axed in the repeal and 'replace'

"No, YOU'RE a doodoohead!"

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...obama-colluded-or-obstructed-in-2016-election“Well I just heard today for the first time that Obama knew about Russia a long time before the election, and he did nothing about it. But nobody wants to talk about that,” Trump told “Fox and Friends Weekend.”

:rolleyes:
“Well I just heard today for the first time that Obama knew about Russia a long time before the election, and he did nothing about it. But nobody wants to talk about that,” Trump told “Fox and Friends Weekend.” So which is it. Was it all faux news or did it happen? or do we flip a coin to figure out what we think today?
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

So Supreme Court says a limited version of Trumpy's Muslim ban can be implemented. My question is, why do we need it? Now?

Trumpy's entire rationale for imposing the ban was that they needed to strengthen the screening and vetting process, so while they were doing this, travellers from these seven countries would be banned for 90 days.

Well, the 90 days are over, have they not bothered to strengthen and improve the screening process? More incompetence from this administration? They haven't been doing anything? Or were they simply lying about the reasons why they wanted such a discriminatory piece of law?

I wish someone in the "liberal" media would ask him this.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Well, the 90 days are over, have they not bothered to strengthen and improve the screening process?

What I read is that the injunction stopped all work, so no, the screening process hasn't been reviewed, etc.

Now, with this SCOTUS ruling, the 90 day clock starts and it expires, you guessed it, just before the SCOTUS restarts in the fall (like Oct 2) making hearing this case moot as the temporary 90 day suspension would be over.

Government. < facepalm >
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Government. < facepalm >

Hardly. It sounds like that's the ideal outcome for a Court which is deeply divided on the actual merits of the ban. I'm sure Roberts was not looking forward to a 5-4 with 1 cough "majority" opinion, 4 different concurrences in various parts, and 4 different dissents in various parts. A nightmare avoided.
 
What I read is that the injunction stopped all work, so no, the screening process hasn't been reviewed, etc.

Now, with this SCOTUS ruling, the 90 day clock starts and it expires, you guessed it, just before the SCOTUS restarts in the fall (like Oct 2) making hearing this case moot as the temporary 90 day suspension would be over.

Government. < facepalm >

If the injunction stopped all work, then his administration is asinine. It stopped the ban part, not the review.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

If the injunction stopped all work, then his administration is asinine. It stopped the ban part, not the review.

OK, I assumed work stopped based on an injunction and based on the article I read saying the 90 day clock started today. If they they worked through, they got a free extra 90 days of review time.
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

OK, I assumed work stopped based on an injunction and based on the article I read saying the 90 day clock started today. If they they worked through, they got a free extra 90 days of review time.

From what I read they actually did have to stop the work for reviewing what to do. Of course the previous vetting was fine and the 'terrorists' are all home grown but why should logic enter into it?
 
Re: POTUS 45.12: Dan, does it take courage when encountering the covfefe?

Hardly. It sounds like that's the ideal outcome for a Court which is deeply divided on the actual merits of the ban. I'm sure Roberts was not looking forward to a 5-4 with 1 cough "majority" opinion, 4 different concurrences in various parts, and 4 different dissents in various parts. A nightmare avoided.

So you're saying the SCOTUS "OLE!"-'d this one on purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top