What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Somebody please explain the logic to me of Comey telling the truth when he said something that tended to vindicate trump, but lying when he said something that painted trump badly. Really, how stupid are trump supporters? Yeah, dumb question. And the ones who are not stupid? Evil and bigoted. No other explanation. If Comey lied once or twice yesterday, he's sunk. So why not lie about everything? Yet nearly 2/3rds of self identified republicans polled not only approve of trump, they STRONGLY approve. You gotta be 5h!tting me. A Fox poll still showed his overall approval among republicans hovering around 80%. Yes, I know when your approval rating among your own kind dips to 80% or lower, you're pretty much in trouble. But this isn't a normal failure. This poop stain on the bed spread is the worst excuse for a president yet. And this is an office occupied by some pretty horrid creatures. Multiply George W. Bush's incompetence times Richard Nixon's dishonesty and add in the combined racism of James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. That person, my fine forum friends, would still be a better occupant of the oval office than trump.

If you voted for him and still support him you are truly a useless waste of carbon. Do the world a favor and don't reproduce.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Somebody please explain the logic to me of Comey telling the truth when he said something that tended to vindicate trump, but lying when he said something that painted trump badly. Really, how stupid are trump supporters? Yeah, dumb question. And the ones who are not stupid? Evil and bigoted. No other explanation. If Comey lied once or twice yesterday, he's sunk. So why not lie about everything? Yet nearly 2/3rds of self identified republicans polled not only approve of trump, they STRONGLY approve. You gotta be 5h!tting me. A Fox poll still showed his overall approval among republicans hovering around 80%. Yes, I know when your approval rating among your own kind dips to 80% or lower, you're pretty much in trouble. But this isn't a normal failure. This poop stain on the bed spread is the worst excuse for a president yet. And this is an office occupied by some pretty horrid creatures. Multiply George W. Bush's incompetence times Richard Nixon's dishonesty and add in the combined racism of James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. That person, my fine forum friends, would still be a better occupant of the oval office than trump.

If you voted for him and still support him you are truly a useless waste of carbon. Do the world a favor and don't reproduce.
THis is all very easy. -Trump supporters are dumber than a bag of hammers, delusional and proud of their conspiracy theories.
-he didn't lie about everything because it was part of his carefully crafted plan (that only goes for those who aren't able to immediately not 'see the differences')
-If you are delusional you must not be wrong so he is, of course, the next coming. Soon, very soon he will show how he walks on water

My throroughly off the rails friend believes like it is religion and most of those who live around him do to. They live in a rural area, have little if any exposure to outside media- think 1984 and George Orwell
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

This could get him impeached. He can't stop lying and lying under oath is what nabbed Bill Clinton.

THIS. ALL THIS. Hell, Newt coulda blown Bill in the middle of a Congressional Session, and I wouldn't have cared. Just don't lie about it under oath.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

My throroughly off the rails friend believes like it is religion and most of those who live around him do to. They live in a rural area, have little if any exposure to outside media- think 1984 and George Orwell

They think Breitbart is the outside media, and that we're the ones living in 1984. Wake up, sheeple! :p
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Trump stands alone in terms of incompetence, but it was also impossible to understand how Bush could have been elected in '04 after it was clear to all but the insane that Iraq was a huge mistake. Weak competition, sure, but the same confirmation bias was on full display. The decision to invade is defended to this day.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

THIS. ALL THIS. Hell, Newt coulda blown Bill in the middle of a Congressional Session, and I wouldn't have cared. Just don't lie about it under oath.

And it was more than the perjury in Clinton's case. Senator Feingold expressed himself well in a closed door impeachment letter. The following is an excerpt:

I do not have time to discuss the perjury count this afternoon, but will do so in a longer presentation for the Record. Suffice it to say I do not believe the managers have met their burden of proving perjury beyond a reasonable doubt.

As to obstruction of justice, the President did come perilously close. Three quick observations make me conclude that, in fact, he did not commit obstruction of justice beyond a reasonable doubt. First, I am very concerned about the conversations between the President and Betty Currie concerning the specifics of his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. But the critical question there is intent. Was his intent about avoiding discovery by his family and the political problems involved? Or was the core issue trying to avoid the Jones proceeding and the consequences of that?
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Trump stands alone in terms of incompetence, but it was also impossible to understand how Bush could have been elected in '04 after it was clear to all but the insane that Iraq was a huge mistake. Weak competition, sure, but the same confirmation bias was on full display. The decision to invade is defended to this day.

I think you're way overplaying the Iraq war angle. It could have been because I was still in high school and a moron, but the evidence was fairly compelling at the time. Again, young and dumb.

Obviously now we know it completely destabilized the Middle East. But back then it wasn't so obvious. I remember Syria being somewhat of a destination for a few friends in high school going on vacation.

He war hadn't turned ugly in time for the 2004 election. I voted for Boring McWhateverface, but it wasn't a choice like 2016 where only a moron couldn't see Trump playing out like he has.

I'll chalk it up to being young, but Bush didn't induce derangement until much later.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

I'll chalk it up to being young, but Bush didn't induce derangement until much later.

I think Bush saw he could do whatever he wanted, and then the ego REALLY kicked in. I would agree with the above statement.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

I said nothing of the sort.

And now you're just being an ***.

Would it really kill you to ask "Expand on that" or say "I can see where you might think that, but..." Nope. You resort to "You're wrong." I've asked that from you before, and yet....
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

I'm not going to coddle stupid opinions or posts that aren't based in reality. Good luck with that though! I'm pulling for you.
 
Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

I think you're way overplaying the Iraq war angle. It could have been because I was still in high school and a moron, but the evidence was fairly compelling at the time. Again, young and dumb.

Let's chalk it up to you being in high school and a moron :D

The evidence was next to nothing, the rhetoric totally justified it. Kind of like anything Trump wants to do. The AHCA is amazing coverage for all. The wall will be beautiful and Mexico will pay for it...I could go on. Iraq played no role in 9/11, and Sadam actually kept terrorists out of Iraq. Pretty much anyone outside of the administration would tell you there were no WMDs, yet the Ds were still too afraid of being called un-American to vote their conscience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top