POTUS 45.08: Suckers

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

but Trump was a good candidate? Lets see... racist remarks, check. sexist remarks, check. inability to speak coherently, check. conflicts of interest up the ***, check.

Trump was a million times worse as a candidate, yet the moron rednecks still voted for him. It honestly has me question if I want to give up on America and move to Canada.

Yeah, it's funny how every argument against Clinton is BS because Trump is worse on all fronts in spades. Goes to show you the double standard that is applied. Basically what it tells you is if Hillary was a Republican she would have won.

 

[aparch]

The new plan to fund The Wall is to use money from asset forfeiture(which in a lot of cases is just straight up stealing). They named the bill after El Chapo, a guy that escaped from prison by digging under a wall.

I really don't like this real life remake of the movie Clear and Present Danger.


Donald Moffat, as President Bennett, proposed the same thing in the movie. And El Chappo is watching CNN International from prison yelling "That's MY money!!!" like Miguel Sandoval did.



10/10 Original Movie
2/10 Trump Remake.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

And if anyone needs any evidence as to why it is a complete waste of time for Democrats to convince Republican voters (Hillary's dumbest moment) here is the proof.

Two days after Bill O’Reilly’s ouster from Fox News over sexual harassment accusations, Alyce Bradley sipped white wine at an outdoor mall in Alpharetta, Ga., and rued the loss of the network’s biggest star. She and her husband have watched Fox News for years — “It’s always on,” she said — and they enjoyed what they described as Mr. O’Reilly’s “biting commentary” and “different perspective.”

“We will miss him very much,” Ms. Bradley, 61, said.

And then, she delivered her verdict. “I think the left is just out to get him — they won,” she said. “He’s never been convicted, and I feel like he has been shut down.”

You want to know why 53% of white women voted for Trump? Well, there ya go.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/27/...ers-react.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

 

[jerphisch]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Trump could lose even if something like 99.5% of his voters stuck with him. If those .5% were in PA, MI, and WI it could flip.

This was an incredibly close election.

Yes he COULD lose, but I'm not confident he WOULD. Did you read the orgasm fest people who DIDN'T support him have over Gorsuch in my link? He could actually pick up votes simply for his SC pick.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

We had someone who wanted the job. Who was qualified for the job. Who lived her entire life for the job. And, what do the Americans vote for?

This.

“I loved my previous life,” Mr. Trump told Reuters. “I had so many things going. This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier.”

**** this country.

EDIT: Meanwhile.

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s proposal to slash individual and business taxes and erase a surtax that funds the Affordable Care Act would amount to a multitrillion-dollar shift from federal coffers to America’s richest families and their heirs, setting up a politically fraught battle over how best to use the government’s already strained resources.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/27/...ax-wealth.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

 

[joecct]

We had someone who wanted the job. Who was qualified for the job. Who lived her entire life for the job. And, what do the Americans vote for?

This.



**** this country.

SURPRISE!! After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting.

 

[St. Clown]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

but Trump was a good candidate? Lets see... racist remarks, check. sexist remarks, check. inability to speak coherently, check. conflicts of interest up the ***, check.

Trump was a million times worse as a candidate, yet the moron rednecks still voted for him. It honestly has me question if I want to give up on America and move to Canada.

Yes, he was. Sadly. You either run a race to inspire people, to deal with reality in a frank and calm manner, or you prey upon fear. He preyed upon fear, and in doing so could be vile himself because he was acting vile towards the things that were already striking fear in the people to whom he was speaking. He had zero resume' qualifications, but he knows how to connect with the people he needed. That made him a detestable yet good candidate.

 

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

EDIT: Meanwhile.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/27/...ax-wealth.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Looking at that picture, donald needs to start throwing a sheet of Cling Free in the dryer along with his pants. Or change dry cleaners.

 

[bronconick]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Yes he COULD lose, but I'm not confident he WOULD. Did you read the orgasm fest people who DIDN'T support him have over Gorsuch in my link? He could actually pick up votes simply for his SC pick.

Probably did, based on my facebook.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

but Trump was a good candidate? Lets see... racist remarks, check. sexist remarks, check. inability to speak coherently, check. conflicts of interest up the ***, check.

Trump was a million times worse as a candidate, yet the moron rednecks still voted for him. It honestly has me question if I want to give up on America and move to Canada.

Because that's what they wanted to hear from a candidate. Straight-shooting, doesn't give a fuk about whose feelings he hurts or whether he's politically correct or not. Talked the way they do, about the niggas and the f@gs, and the free-loading welfare scum, and that's why they loved him. Still do.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Yeah, it's funny how every argument against Clinton is BS because Trump is worse on all fronts in spades. Goes to show you the double standard that is applied. Basically what it tells you is if Hillary was a Republican she would have won.

No, cause people don't like her. On a visceral level. Even among Democrats. No matter how disgusting Trumpy appears to a lot of people, a similar number just adore him.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Because that's what they wanted to hear from a candidate. Straight-shooting, doesn't give a fuk about whose feelings he hurts or whether he's politically correct or not. Talked the way they do, about the niggas and the f@gs, and the free-loading welfare scum, and that's why they loved him. Still do.

Yet, he's governing like a Republican. Which means all the economic issues those people care about are not getting addressed. And that's the issues we were told over and over again they were voting on. Which, of course, I knew was all lies as well. Republicans don't vote on economics. They vote on Gays, God, and Guns. Period. It's been that way for decades.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

No, cause people don't like her. On a visceral level. Even among Democrats. No matter how disgusting Trumpy appears to a lot of people, a similar number just adore him.

He makes me want to power vomit. Always has.

 

[St. Clown]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

He makes me want to power vomit. Always has.

Well, you're not his voting base.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

“I loved my previous life,” Mr. Trump told Reuters. “I had so many things going. This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier.”

And he's not even really working at it.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Well, you're not his voting base.

Yeah, cause I'm not afraid of Gays, I don't believe God belongs in Government, and I don't think that Obama was coming for anyone's guns. So, of course I'm not his base.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

setting up a politically fraught battle over how best to use the government’s already strained resources.

Ladies and gentlemen, your "liberal" media.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Ladies and gentlemen, your "liberal" media.

Yeah, it's a joke. They are so afraid of being perceived as biased they give pure insanity equal time.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

Yet, he's governing like a Republican. Which means all the economic issues those people care about are not getting addressed. And that's the issues we were told over and over again they were voting on. Which, of course, I knew was all lies as well. Republicans don't vote on economics. They vote on Gays, God, and Guns. Period. It's been that way for decades.

Silly. He hasn't been able to get the things done for them, cause the Washington establishment is fighting him at every turn. Even the Republicans, damm that Ryan.

Give him time to get more of his people in, knock some more heads, and drain that swamp, and then you'll see.

 

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers

He makes me want to power vomit. Always has.

Now you know how Republicans feel about Hillary.

Although I think many harbor a secret lust for her, and their hatred for her acts as a shield, a mask, cause they hate themselves for those feelings. Sort of like the Log Cabin Republicans.