What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

1985 said:
You will be told that it is CSC's fault that the Norwich player pulled his helmet off, CSC is responsible for the other teams penalties as they would not take them against other teams but it is because of the way CSC plays
Click to expand...

http://board.uscho.com/showthread.php?94384-Castleton-vs.-Norwich&p=5034818&viewfull=1#post5034818

Actually Castleton was bashed again for penalties and destroying the Interlock. Oh, no one from Norwich explained why the player who ripped of the Castleton player's helmet never sat for that infraction (15 PIMs in one play - 5 Facemask and 10 minute misconduct). Yet questioned why a Castleton player did not get benched for accumulating 20 penalty minutes over 2 games.
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

CSC Dad said:
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.php?94384-Castleton-vs.-Norwich&p=5034818&viewfull=1#post5034818

Actually Castleton was bashed again for penalties and destroying the Interlock. Oh, no one from Norwich explained why the player who ripped of the Castleton player's helmet never sat for that infraction (15 PIMs in one play - 5 Facemask and 10 minute misconduct). Yet questioned why a Castleton player did not get benched for accumulating 20 penalty minutes over 2 games.
Click to expand...
Perhaps because it was an aberation, not a consistant thing. As far as "destroying the interlock", shouldn't you be asking NESCAC people that?
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

Never bashed CSC or said the were the reason the interlock died. I said that was the presumption with most of the teams that they play on the edge and teams didnt want to play them. If you can't handle the truth than you are just thin skinned and can't deal with reality. Other than that one incedent with CSC I have no problem with them. If the truth hurts dont read my post.
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

Originally Posted by hockeyfan77
Teams just don't want to schedule them...I have heard that many of the interlock teams don't want to play them: NESCSC teams hate them, a main reason they left???? not sure but I think so(CSC is not the only team in this boat however): I am not a huge fan of the NESCAC anyway...

There are reasons why but I will not share them on this board....You played Colby because of the interlock by the way....I am in no way typing to slam CSC players but if you can't find opponents their is a reason...I am also not trying to diss you either 1985 because unlike Northern Bile you bring reason and decent thought out post to these boards...CSC is going to be TOUGH next year, not looking forward to playing them twice....


in this post, I read "nescac main reason they left?" this post led to others bashing CSC and their "pattern" of dumb penalties. 20 min a game, many contact to the head penalties etc etc.....perception of cheap play and then the spewing of stats that were eithere 1/2 truths or needed to be put in perspective....so yes it would appear that CSC is being bashed
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

A more appropriate thread title may have been:

Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here....but know that if you do we will beat you to a bloody pulp, say that you are a moron, and absolutely rip your favorite team to shreds!
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

1985 said:
Originally Posted by hockeyfan77
Teams just don't want to schedule them...I have heard that many of the interlock teams don't want to play them: NESCSC teams hate them, a main reason they left???? not sure but I think so(CSC is not the only team in this boat however): I am not a huge fan of the NESCAC anyway...

There are reasons why but I will not share them on this board....You played Colby because of the interlock by the way....I am in no way typing to slam CSC players but if you can't find opponents their is a reason...I am also not trying to diss you either 1985 because unlike Northern Bile you bring reason and decent thought out post to these boards...CSC is going to be TOUGH next year, not looking forward to playing them twice....


in this post, I read "nescac main reason they left?" this post led to others bashing CSC and their "pattern" of dumb penalties. 20 min a game, many contact to the head penalties etc etc.....perception of cheap play and then the spewing of stats that were eithere 1/2 truths or needed to be put in perspective....so yes it would appear that CSC is being bashed
Click to expand...


Man, but am I doing the bashing????, I never said anything about hits to the head but the perception is there: as evidenced by the post of other poster....If you think that perception wasn't there before this thread than you are sorely mistaken...I also said I was not sure if that was the main reason but it THOUGHT is was: again perception and informed opinion....I also stated (CSC is not the only team in this boat however)...Get it right...Please....
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

Blueliner03 said:
Did I read a post in one of either this thread or the speculation thread regarding SOS < .500 being dropped from the field per the NCAA handbook (as the case with Castleton)? Or, was that one of the Bracketologists' own rules?

If a NCAA rule, obviously this would not apply to an AQ team like Adrian, Curry, Bowdoin.

(Based on the 3-1-11 rankings)
Click to expand...

Josh considered .500 his arbitrary cutoff for his own analysis purposes. Generally speaking, history has shown that when in doubt it's usually wise to pay heavy deference to SOS. More often than not it seems to carry significant weight in a given year's selection.
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

93GreatLaker said:
A more appropriate thread title may have been:

Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here....but know that if you do we will beat you to a bloody pulp, say that you are a moron, and absolutely rip your favorite team to shreds!
Click to expand...

I'm starting to think the appropriate title should have been:

Post all your whines, objections, complaints about Castleton here

:D
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

LakerFan99 said:
I'm starting to think the appropriate title should have been:

Post all your whines, objections, complaints about Castleton here

:D
Click to expand...
I propose the rest of us leave '77, '85 and Daddy alone and let them slug it out here - make this the LAST POST by an "outsider" on this bloody thread...DROP THE PUCK ALREADY!!!
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

LakerEagleLover said:
I propose the rest of us leave '77, '85 and Daddy alone and let them slug it out here - make this the LAST POST by an "outsider" on this bloody thread...DROP THE PUCK ALREADY!!!
Click to expand...

just leave........ if it's not about Oswego you consistantly talk down to anyone that posts about the team they follow
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

I do not think it is appropriate to whine about the whiners on the whines thread. Those that do should be ashamed of themselves. :p
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

hockeyfan77 said:
Man, but am I doing the bashing????, I never said anything about hits to the head but the perception is there: as evidenced by the post of other poster....If you think that perception wasn't there before this thread than you are sorely mistaken...I also said I was not sure if that was the main reason but it THOUGHT is was: again perception and informed opinion....I also stated (CSC is not the only team in this boat however)...Get it right...Please....
Click to expand...

As for USM, I do think they are making good strides and after getting some players back from injuries they had an impressive 4-2-1 record down the stretch, they have seemed to cut their penalty minutes and that is always a good thing......may want to get more than 15 shots on net thou to have any chance against Norwich :)
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

snc1 said:
Adrian will always be the champ when it comes to this.
Click to expand...

Geeeez......just no love for the BullDogs! For your sake, I hope that SNC & Adrian can get at each other for another tilt! I hate seeing you lose sleep dealing with all this anger. :)
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

GoBullDogsGo said:
Geeeez......just no love for the BullDogs! For your sake, I hope that SNC & Adrian can get at each other for another tilt! I hate seeing you lose sleep dealing with all this anger. :)
Click to expand...

I'd love to see that - MCHA vs. NCHA for the national title.
 
Re: Post all your cries whines, objections, complaints here

I'm just going to make one last statement about CSC's PIM - 1985 said that their mean was distorted by some outliers. The best way to measure the center or typical value for a data set with outliers is to consider the median value. The median is a resistant measure of center which is not distorted by unusual values. For CSC PIM the median is 18 - not so different from the mean of 19.8. Interestingly enough, the median PIM for Castleton's opponents was 14. I'm not trying to make a value judgement here, just reporting data.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top