What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

PC - A new start and a new venue

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

J.D. said:
uh when you're not sure, you absolutely talk to the other refs. none of them had it as a high stick and obviously no replay showed it as such. i mean we certainly realize hockey east officiating is awful but last night was actually a good night for them compared to what i usually see.
Click to expand...

I guess you didn't recognize him hesitate to make a call on the ice for ten seconds, then conference with the refs before looking at the video. Look at the video...then conference with the refs again, make his call. Nothing would change between his first conference with the linesmen to the second since they are NOT involved in a replay decision.

And if you think that hook called on Rooney was a good call, I have no clue what game you watched as Gaudreau clearly had Rooney's stick pinned between his body and arm held then went down on the ice.

Again, Embellishment on Mauermann...ok sure...didn't know you could make contact with a player off the puck w/o getting called for interference!
 
The Zlax45 said:
I guess you didn't recognize him hesitate to make a call on the ice for ten seconds, then conference with the refs before looking at the video. Look at the video...then conference with the refs again, make his call. Nothing would change between his first conference with the linesmen to the second since they are NOT involved in a replay decision.

And if you think that hook called on Rooney was a good call, I have no clue what game you watched as Gaudreau clearly had Rooney's stick pinned between his body and arm held then went down on the ice.

Again, Embellishment on Mauermann...ok sure...didn't know you could make contact with a player off the puck w/o getting called for interference!
Click to expand...

Jesus, please stop with the whining.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

Ted Hart commits to Providence
By Nathan Fournier

The third Hart brother has decided on his college of choice.

Ted Hart of Cumberland will follow his oldest brother Kevin to the Providence College Friars for the fall of 2015.

The middle brother Brian Hart, who is a 2012 second round draft pick of the Tampa Bay Lightning, is currently a sophomore at Harvard.

“They started recruiting me in April,” Ted Hart said, who is now at Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, N.H after spending the last three years at Greely High School.
Click to expand...

LINK>>>
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

again, what is the issue with conferencing with the other officials and also looking at video replay? there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

and i already acknowledged that that particular play involving gaudreau was a bad call so i'm not sure what your point is.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

J.D. said:
again, what is the issue with conferencing with the other officials and also looking at video replay? there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

and i already acknowledged that that particular play involving gaudreau was a bad call so i'm not sure what your point is.
Click to expand...

My point is conferring with them AFTER the replay not before the replay which he should do. He looks at the replay, and comes out to conference with them again? How many times have you seen a ref do that? It doesn't happen as the linesmen's opinions are NOT going to change after the replay. So what was the reason he went to speak with Leaman after making the call, and going back into the box to look at the replay again?

The play in question happened right in front of me and Hansen hesitated on making a call on it waiting 5-10 seconds before making a goal or high stick call as he was unsure.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

Who cares? BC is a better team than PC, it showed on the ice on Friday and they got that call right. That's all you can hope for from this frigging league.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

this reminds me of when there was uproar after umass wasn't credited with an illegal goal earlier in the year against BC. as far as i know, zlax, the ref in this case did everything he could to see if it was a legal goal or not. if they had any evidence whatsoever that it was a high stick, they would have called it off. trust me, i've seen more than enough waved off goals at conte.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

The Zlax45 said:
My point is conferring with them AFTER the replay not before the replay which he should do. He looks at the replay, and comes out to conference with them again? How many times have you seen a ref do that? It doesn't happen as the linesmen's opinions are NOT going to change after the replay. So what was the reason he went to speak with Leaman after making the call, and going back into the box to look at the replay again?

The play in question happened right in front of me and Hansen hesitated on making a call on it waiting 5-10 seconds before making a goal or high stick call as he was unsure.
Click to expand...

In 2008 we went to Vermont for two games. Hansen was the official. BC tied it in the 3rd. Hansen signaled a goal, then talked to his crew and THEN spoke to the goal judge before waiving the goal, claiming a high stick. Replays, which weren't in use at the time clearly showed a good goal. Because he left the ice to speak with the goal judge he was sent home by Bertagna and another crew was brought in the next night. Get over it.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

BC sucks and fans of BC suck (especially the REALLY old ones which is about all of them). Plus I don't care for that part of Chestnut Hill. Just sayin....
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

PC91 said:
BC sucks and fans of BC suck (especially the REALLY old ones which is about all of them). Plus I don't care for that part of Chestnut Hill. Just sayin....
Click to expand...

It's good to have some sanity in this thread for once.

:D
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

theprofromdover said:
In 2008 we went to Vermont for two games. Hansen was the official. BC tied it in the 3rd. Hansen signaled a goal, then talked to his crew and THEN spoke to the goal judge before waiving the goal, claiming a high stick. Replays, which weren't in use at the time clearly showed a good goal. Because he left the ice to speak with the goal judge he was sent home by Bertagna and another crew was brought in the next night. Get over it.
Click to expand...

Goal judges are hired by the home teams. PC doesn't even have goal judges anymore.
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

Carmine Scarpaglia said:
Who cares? BC is a better team than PC, it showed on the ice on Friday and they got that call right. That's all you can hope for from this frigging league.
Click to expand...

Yet, BC couldn't beat Brown..a middling ECAC team. At least, PC can do that :-)

So Holy Cross is a better team?
 
Last edited:
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

PC91 said:
BC sucks and fans of BC suck (especially the REALLY old ones which is about all of them). Plus I don't care for that part of Chestnut Hill. Just sayin....
Click to expand...
Correct. Nobody sucks better than us.

The Zlax45 said:
Yet, BC couldn't beat Brown..a middling ECAC team. At least, PC can do that :-)
So Holy Cross is a better team?
Click to expand...
Wait...
We can't beat Brown, we can't beat Holy Cross...BUT WE CAN WHOOP FRIAR ARSE!
PC91, PC91... you SUCK, at life, at fandom. It's all your fault, it's all your fault, it's all your fault! :D
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

That "middling" ECAC team is a much more dangerous opponent than the slumping (and, frankly, not all that talented outside Gillies) Friars at the moment. I think BC and Denver would attest to that. :)
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

zlax, what measure would be acceptable to you then if you don't want to use your eyes? the hockey east standings? PWR?
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

I think multiple people need to let it go at this point. At least throw in some inappropriate jokes about BU while you're on our thread. Standards people! Standards!

(I might have made this thread worse...)
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

Jon said:
PC is probably heading into the CC weekend at the right time....
Click to expand...

even though they suck this year, going out there for two is not ever easy. We're rooting for you though, at least i thought so before all this vitriol today:eek:;)
 
Re: PC - A new start and a new venue

J.D. said:
zlax, what measure would be acceptable to you then if you don't want to use your eyes? the hockey east standings? PWR?
Click to expand...

Nice job putting words in my mouth..I never said PC was better than BC....just using your way of saying one team is better than another on the ice thus HC is better than BC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top