Re: Official XXX Olympics Results - Spoilers Welcome
I don't follow volleyball closely enough to know, but I was thinking about the switch to rally scoring a few days ago. That must have been hugely controversial at the time - it would have completely changed the emphasis of the game. Before rally scoring, you would have had to score on 11(?) of your own serves to win a set (game), but now you only have to score on 2 of your own serves (out of ~20) to win. This would be a huge shift to emphasis on offense (the serve receiver gets the first opportunity for a kill) over defense (being able to handle that first kill) - if you can "side-out" 100% of the time, you will eventually win the game.
Excellent observations!
for amusement, I sometimes keep track under the "old" rules....last night's final between May - Walsh vs Kessy - Ross, for example, was 7-2, 7-2 I think.
Certainly it makes a big difference at the start of the game! you actually can win by 1 point under the old rules! you receive first, side out, it's 1 - 0, you score 1 point on your serve, it's 2 - 0, then side-out the rest of the way, you win by 2 under the new rules but only by 1 under the old rules.
Under the old rules, you'd always pick serve first; under the new rules, you'd probably pick receive first (chances of scoring on opponents' serve is well over 50%).
I think the new rules were probably adopted to facilitate tournament play, especially on the beach, though I'm really not at all sure of their genesis. My playing career was winding down just when pro beach volleyball became popular (I had modest success in semi-pro beach play in the midwest, winning a few hundred dollars every other weekend or so, but when the "real" pro tour came to town, I realized how much better those guys were than I ever could aspire to be! They'd let local players enter the early rounds and knock each other off, then slot the touring pros in at the round of 16 or so. We actually played one of them once and were thrilled just to score a few points. Blocking seemed kind of futile since they could hit over us anyway, but it was safer than not blocking and getting "six-packed"*)
I find some of the commentary a bit amusing. When talking about which player to serve, our general rule was "serve the better setter" since you typically would score points only if they shanked the service reception (which usually only happened if it was windy and you knew how to spin the ball into the wind), or off of hitting "errors," which may have allowed you to dig a spike. A lot of the dinks and pokes you see in the women's game wouldn't work so well in the men's game, the men are just bigger and faster and stronger and the court is the same size. The men could run them down while the women couldn't (the men's net is 8' while the women's net is something like 7' 4-1/2" or so).
The more important rule change for beach players was allowing the blocker to penetrate the plane of the net. that was huge. it really tilted the game toward taller players; before that rule change, a shorter player could at least "tool" the block (deliberately hit into the block in such a way that the ball would carom out of play).
* a "six-pack" is when you spiked a ball into the face of a player on the other team. all your teammates would each buy you a beer, hence the name....from time to time you actually could cause a bloody nose.....