USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
- Thread starter dxmnkd316
- Start date
- Status
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
i debated between lumps, sugar, and houses (of congress).
i debated between lumps, sugar, and houses (of congress).
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
This is getting off to a slow start, so I'll try to give it a nudge toward sharper debate.
Of course, we're talking confectioners. Becaus the TPers are a bunch of snow white lightweights, and they can be a little flaky.
This is getting off to a slow start, so I'll try to give it a nudge toward sharper debate.
Of course, we're talking confectioners. Becaus the TPers are a bunch of snow white lightweights, and they can be a little flaky.
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
That was the point you made in a different post, numbskull. I wanted to know where you found some hack's commentary from bigjournalism.com linking Sesame Street to CAIR. Now I want to know why you're trying to disavow ever making that particular post. You'd make a politician proud with that kind of selective memory.
That was the point you made in a different post, numbskull. I wanted to know where you found some hack's commentary from bigjournalism.com linking Sesame Street to CAIR. Now I want to know why you're trying to disavow ever making that particular post. You'd make a politician proud with that kind of selective memory.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
The Republicans aren't big on brown sugar, but they are saps.
This is getting off to a slow start, so I'll try to give it a nudge toward sharper debate.
Of course, we're talking confectioners. Becaus the TPers are a bunch of snow white lightweights, and they can be a little flaky.
The Republicans aren't big on brown sugar, but they are saps.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
Of course the Tea Partiers don't like brown sugar. Bunch of racists.
Of course the Tea Partiers don't like brown sugar. Bunch of racists.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
That's el azúcar terciado, hombre.
"This has all happened before. And it will happen again."
That's el azúcar terciado, hombre.
"This has all happened before. And it will happen again."
Last edited:
ScottM
**** it feels good to be a bankster
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
How about "Do you take your Tea Party with one bag or two?"
How about "Do you take your Tea Party with one bag or two?"
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
This.
How about "Do you take your Tea Party with one bag or two?"
This.
huskyfan
New member
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
winner winner chicken dinner
How about "Do you take your Tea Party with one bag or two?"
winner winner chicken dinner
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
2 bags
and a sack
How about "Do you take your Tea Party with one bag or two?"
2 bags
and a sack
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
Why don't you put your time to better use and get some drunk drivers off? For the record, Mr. Berger, I'm not "disavowing" the earlier post. In your sub literate response, you didn't make clear which of my posts you were responding to. So stop pounding the table.
Why don't you put your time to better use and get some drunk drivers off? For the record, Mr. Berger, I'm not "disavowing" the earlier post. In your sub literate response, you didn't make clear which of my posts you were responding to. So stop pounding the table.
Last edited:
unofan
Well-known member
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
And yet you've continued to ignore the straightforward question at least 3 times now. So I'm guessing you agree that the site is yellow journalism. Good.
By the way, they spend a whole semester of law school teaching us lawyer jokes. The dregs you've been pulling out aren't even close to being Grade A material.
And yet you've continued to ignore the straightforward question at least 3 times now. So I'm guessing you agree that the site is yellow journalism. Good.
By the way, they spend a whole semester of law school teaching us lawyer jokes. The dregs you've been pulling out aren't even close to being Grade A material.
Re: Obama XVII: Do You Take Your Tea Party with One Sugar or Two?
Obviously I have my work cut out for me, Mr. Berger. BTW that was Harvard Law School you referenced, right? Anyway, now that you've made it clear which of my posts you were referring to, I believe it was linked on Lucianne.com. Happy now?
Obviously I have my work cut out for me, Mr. Berger. BTW that was Harvard Law School you referenced, right? Anyway, now that you've made it clear which of my posts you were referring to, I believe it was linked on Lucianne.com. Happy now?
Last edited:
busterman62
I got a pocket full of kryptonite
- Status