What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Noel Reuben? He coached Avon's Ryan Siedem (BC) too...

Whose track record? Reuben's or Bradley's *advisor*?

Gr8Sk8M8.. you are a NU well wisher..
right? 'cause most of us on the NU forum.. ya know, want to be about that (least i think so) & the program to succeed in a competitive hockey landscape. I would wish a good prospect would want to come to a good school (which NU certainly is).. yr in, yr out.
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Gr8Sk8M8.. you are a NU well wisher..
right? 'cause most of us on the NU forum.. ya know, want to be about that (least i think so) & the program to succeed in a competitive hockey landscape. I would wish a good prospect would want to come to a good school (which NU certainly is).. yr in, yr out.

Yes...I am a NU well wisher...I'm also a hockey guy which is something that you folks always fail to consider or are too busy trying to find fault with whatever I post.

Two odd years ago, I said to not count on Kyle MacClean actually attending NU...4 odd years ago I said not to count on Cam Darcy finishing the year...4 years ago I said Oksroba wouldn't be back...5 years ago i gave a heads up on blockbuster late breaking recruits...Roy brothers... all met with disbelief in various venues and forums by the Huskie faithful...

I hope Bradley attends NU but he's 15 years old...he has the OHL draft this year and while his advisor group is well known for some of the local players in the NHL *cough*eichel*vesey*cough* who have played college hockey...Bradley is a different situation...
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Yes...I am a NU well wisher...I'm also a hockey guy which is something that you folks always fail to consider or are too busy trying to find fault with whatever I post.

Two odd years ago, I said to not count on Kyle MacClean actually attending NU...4 odd years ago I said not to count on Cam Darcy finishing the year...4 years ago I said Oksroba wouldn't be back...5 years ago i gave a heads up on blockbuster late breaking recruits...Roy brothers... all met with disbelief in various venues and forums by the Huskie faithful...

I hope Bradley attends NU but he's 15 years old...he has the OHL draft this year and while his advisor group is well known for some of the local players in the NHL *cough*eichel*vesey*cough* who have played college hockey...Bradley is a different situation...

..good :) & i always appreciate your input.
just checking.
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

..good :) & i always appreciate your input.
just checking.

No worries...and congruent to my self appointed duty to keep you on the cutting edge of information, I offer you this...don't forget to set your clocks ahead before you go to bed on 11th March...
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Yes...I am a NU well wisher...I'm also a hockey guy which is something that you folks always fail to consider or are too busy trying to find fault with whatever I post.

Two odd years ago, I said to not count on Kyle MacClean actually attending NU...4 odd years ago I said not to count on Cam Darcy finishing the year...4 years ago I said Oksroba wouldn't be back...5 years ago i gave a heads up on blockbuster late breaking recruits...Roy brothers... all met with disbelief in various venues and forums by the Huskie faithful...

...

McLean was an easy call as he had been drafted by the same OHL team that his dad had played for. When you made these forecasts, what was your screen name at the time?
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

McLean was an easy call as he had been drafted by the same OHL team that his dad had played for. When you made these forecasts, what was your screen name at the time?

I forget... :D

If it's any consolation...you've never liked me...
 
Last edited:
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

It's good to know that I'm consistent. What were some of your screen names? Who knows? I might have liked one of them.

Think you came around on my second one here...were you ever on HF?
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Think you came around on my second one here...were you ever on HF?

Are you a politician? Perhaps a spokesman for the president? I ask a question, don't get a specific answer, and find you've answered with a question of your own.:rolleyes: What is HF referring to?
 
Last edited:
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Are you a politician? Perhaps a spoken for the president. I ask a question, don't get a specific answer, and find you've answered with a question of your own.:rolleyes: What is HF referring to?

I would guess Hockey Futures board. Far more focused on NHL/draft pick stuff.
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Is your chest starting to hurt from the amount you have been pounding it the last 48 hours?

Using a scale of 1-10 with 1 being your wit...5 being your tortuous sentence structure....and 10 you trying to think...

3...
 
Last edited:
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Actual hockey content instead of whatever is happening to the board:

The Case for Zach Aston-Reese winning the Hobey Baker Award. Comparisons to Vecchione and Kelleher.
http://northeasternhockeyblog.com/2...astern-huskies-mike-vecchione-tyler-kelleher/

Interesting read. On the first table when you looked at Opp win% did you include their records against the team you are actually considering? It probably won't make a huge difference, but for the story you are trying to tell it would be more exact. Additionally, how is it possible that teams Kelleher has played OOC have played >120 more games than NU or Union's opponents. Also since Union plays Ivy League opponents I find it surprising their opponents have played 37 more games than NU, as they have 6 in conference opponents who play nearly 10 fewer games than NU's equivalent opponents.

I am not a huge fan of punishing a player for being on the ice when empty net goals are scored for their team. For one thing it means they were on the ice in crucial situations. Secondly it means they succeeded in those crucial situations. From a pure points perspective its interesting to track, but I am not sure it can be considered a huge negative.
 
Re: Northeastern Huskies 2016-17 Part II: Postseason Edition

Interesting read. On the first table when you looked at Opp win% did you include their records against the team you are actually considering? It probably won't make a huge difference, but for the story you are trying to tell it would be more exact. Additionally, how is it possible that teams Kelleher has played OOC have played >120 more games than NU or Union's opponents. Also since Union plays Ivy League opponents I find it surprising their opponents have played 37 more games than NU, as they have 6 in conference opponents who play nearly 10 fewer games than NU's equivalent opponents.

I am not a huge fan of punishing a player for being on the ice when empty net goals are scored for their team. For one thing it means they were on the ice in crucial situations. Secondly it means they succeeded in those crucial situations. From a pure points perspective its interesting to track, but I am not sure it can be considered a huge negative.

Northeastern's OOC games tended to be two games series against the same team, so their total games played would only count once (For example, QU played NU twice, but their 34 game schedule only counted one time). UNH played teams predominantly one time each, in fact they did not play a single one of their out-of-conference opponents twice. So while they played the same number of OOC games, the fact that UNH played more teams meant there were more records to be included in the calculation of winning percentage. The same logic applies to why Union has more games in their calculation than NU, in spite of the Ivy League teams. Of Union's 11 OOC games, only twice did they play the same opponent twice.

If that was a butchered, incoherent explanation I apologize.
 
Back
Top