North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

[Gophers #1]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

UND also got a penalty. so 1:17 of Gophers PP.

 

[K7776S2001]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

MN penalty. JFC guys, stop this.

And what a cheap shot. Typical.

cheap? wow

 

[Dirty]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

MN penalty. JFC guys, stop this.

And what a cheap shot. Typical.

God, you're a whiner.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

God, you're a whiner.

You have a weird definition of whining.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

cheap? wow

After the whistle? Yeah, I'd say that would be considered "cheap."

 

[K7776S2001]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

You have a weird definition of whining.

or is it that Gopher fans operate under a different standard


edit: oh please, it was right after the whistle and he hit him from the front, if thats going to be the threshold for cheap, every game has tons of cheap hits

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

or is it that Gopher fans operate under a different standard

We always hold ourselves to a higher standard.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Say what you will about Doug and The Rug, but at least they pronounce "Gregoire" correctly.

 

[Siouxfaninseattle]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Sioux are looking snake-bit tonite. Can't finish a play.

 

[Sloe Gin]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Brent is a whiner

 

[Dirty]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Amanda needs to shut the hell up.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Brent is a whiner

You misspelled "winner."

And Kangas makes another couple of big saves.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Amanda needs to shut the hell up.

QFT.

 

[Dirty]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

You misspelled "winner."

And Kangas makes another couple of big saves.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. The first save was nice. The second save he wasn't even in the net and neither was the shot. If he doesn't save that, it still isn't a goal.

 

[A Shot and a Goal]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Duluth 2
Mankato 1 in the 2nd

Wisc 2
CC 1 in the 1st

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

This is exactly what I'm talking about. The first save was nice. The second save he wasn't even in the net and neither was the shot. If he doesn't save that, it still isn't a goal.

Uh, it could've been a rebound for a scoring opportunity. And if a shot/pass hits the goalie it's a save. Therefore, those were a couple big saves. Not KANGAS KHAN saves, but big saves nonetheless.

 

[Dirty]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

Uh, it could've been a rebound for a scoring opportunity. And if a shot/pass hits the goalie it's a save. Therefore, those were a couple big saves. Not KANGAS KHAN saves, but big saves nonetheless.

I could've made the second save. He was sitting there and was hit with the puck. I'm sorry you're so easily impressed by everything Kangas does and think it's a big deal.

 

[The Rube]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

I could've made the second save. He was sitting there and was hit with the puck. I'm sorry you're so easily impressed by everything Kangas does and think it's a big deal.

And if you did make that second save, it still would have been a huge save. Your point?

 

[Dirty]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

And if you did make that second save, it still would have been a huge save. Your point?

No it wouldn't. You are way too easily impressed.

 

[K7776S2001]

Re: North Dakota @ Minnesota 1/16/10

No it wouldn't. You are way too easily impressed.

makes life easier when you set lower standards