Wow this is quite the 5th grade discussion going on here. Pretty intelligent stuff.
Spoken like someone who doesn't know NH.
Doubtful, they haven't for any games outside of the TD Garden as of yet.
I've been to NH plenty of times. Have you ever been north of Concord (over half of the state)? Rural NH is not much different from rural Maine. Ever been to the north country? Sure is a cultural meca! Good hiking in the White Mountains though, I'm sure I'll spend some time in the whites this summer after I get bored going to MDI every day.
Wow this is quite the 5th grade discussion going on here. Pretty intelligent stuff.
Maine needs a big weekend to have any remote hope for this season. UNH is always tough at home and the crowd will no doubt be fired up for this weekend. I for one hope to see two good, exciting hockey games.
Good points and provides lead in to hockey-related questions:
<UL>
<LI> On Dec 10 two goals by a UNH freshman were the difference. How do these teams match up?
<LI> Maine needed more than a point last weekend at home, so desperate now (PWR=20t). Does recent performance give reasons to believe desperation will cause UMaine to play super? (e.g., did Maine deserve more but BU’s Millan was immense?)
<LI> Some credited Sirman with win over BC, but loss to BU. Who’s in goal and what can we expect?
<LI> Will Borisinok play and does it make a difference?
<LI> Given this rivalry and students in huge numbers, any danger that UNH would look ahead to Merrimack?
</UL>
* UNH probably is the better overall skating team with more depth. I cannot remember exactly but I believe O'Neil was out for Maine in the last game and he is probably Maine's best Dman and plays the point on the power play, having him in the line up will certainly help this series.
Wasn't Maine without 2 of their regular D-men?
I believe O'Neil was out for Maine in the last game and he is probably Maine's best Dman .
No wonder Maine isn't as good as we think. Wil is a good offensive D man but if he's the best we got then I shouldn't complain about the teams record. Dimmen is obviously still hurt but he is Maine best Dman, Van Dyk is having his best year, Cornell gets moved around on a whim so who knows.
neither Dimmen or O'Neill played against UNH
Thanks for the update, with my work load and the boys schedule, I have not had a chance to see many games in the last few years, listen to all of them though but it is hard to form a good opinion on a player without watching them over the course of a number of games.
Wow this is quite the 5th grade discussion going on here. Pretty intelligent stuff.
I've been to NH plenty of times. Have you ever been north of Concord (over half of the state)? Rural NH is not much different from rural Maine. Ever been to the north country? Sure is a cultural meca! Good hiking in the White Mountains though, I'm sure I'll spend some time in the whites this summer after I get bored going to MDI every day.
That was beautiful. Thank you IWC.So be it. I'll have an intelligent discussion on why the past really doesn't matter.
There are many fans on this board who feel it necessary to point out a major flaw in UNH's men's hockey program; namely, the lack of a national championship. Perhaps it is more glaring that our best chance at winning one was thwarted by our rivals to the north, UMaine. Fans of that program have taken a particular delight in reveling over that particular game, along with many other of our post-season shortcomings. Due to the fact that past events cannot be changed, nor do they have a direct outcome on the upcoming game, it is irrelevant to use historical results as an argumentative crutch.
That isn't to say that there is no impact on the teams whatsoever. To the contrary, the fallout of that game, along with many other past match-ups, has created an atmosphere of a rivalry between the 2 schools where this game has additional meaning attached to it. Were it not for the 1999 game, along with many others along the way, UNH would not have continued the drive towards earning a national title. Though it may act as an impetus for UNH to strive for the national title, our past failures aren't a part of this weekend's series.
In honesty, even last weekend's triumphs won't be in this weekend's series. The fluidity of time forces a team to constantly keep improving itself in order for it to be considered "The Best That There Is." Time is constantly in motion, and therefore, the past is in a constant rate of growth. The future, to our minds, is infinite; we don't know when it ends (some even believe that there will be no end of time, it will simply start over again). All that truly matters is who the best team is at this given moment. Even the last game played between these two teams is irrelevant because circumstances have changed at least three times over. Lines have shuffled. Players who were injured then are healthy now, and vice versa. Like time, the teams are in a constant state of flux.
Since December, these teams have changed superficially; since 1999 these programs have changed immensely. The change at UMaine is obvious: your coach tragically passed away in 2001 and created an upheaval of seismic proportions. UNH lost a great assistant coach, Brian McCloskey, to the women's hockey program where he has had relatively successful seasons. Furthermore, the hockey teams themselves have graduated 2 full classes of players since then. Most players on the teams now were in elementary school in 1999. Their connections to that game are minimal, if any.
To sum, it is heinous to use our past, which could be likened to Shakespearean tragedy, in order to prop up your insults against our program. The kids playing this year were 5th graders themselves during the Incident in Anaheim. Furthermore, due to the transient nature of time, even Friday night's game will be made irrelevant by the time the puck drops on Saturday night. Though some of the emotions may carry over, the direct impact ANY of our past failures have on our program are, in fact, uncorrelated to the play of our student-athletes.
the fallout of that game, along with many other past match-ups, has created an atmosphere of a rivalry between the 2 schools where this game has additional meaning attached to it.
Yeah, Saturday is the issue.
So be it. I'll have an intelligent discussion on why the past really doesn't matter.
There are many fans on this board who feel it necessary to point out a major flaw in UNH's men's hockey program; namely, the lack of a national championship. Perhaps it is more glaring that our best chance at winning one was thwarted by our rivals to the north, UMaine. Fans of that program have taken a particular delight in reveling over that particular game, along with many other of our post-season shortcomings. Due to the fact that past events cannot be changed, nor do they have a direct outcome on the upcoming game, it is irrelevant to use historical results as an argumentative crutch.
That isn't to say that there is no impact on the teams whatsoever. To the contrary, the fallout of that game, along with many other past match-ups, has created an atmosphere of a rivalry between the 2 schools where this game has additional meaning attached to it. Were it not for the 1999 game, along with many others along the way, UNH would not have continued the drive towards earning a national title. Though it may act as an impetus for UNH to strive for the national title, our past failures aren't a part of this weekend's series.
In honesty, even last weekend's triumphs won't be in this weekend's series. The fluidity of time forces a team to constantly keep improving itself in order for it to be considered "The Best That There Is." Time is constantly in motion, and therefore, the past is in a constant rate of growth. The future, to our minds, is infinite; we don't know when it ends (some even believe that there will be no end of time, it will simply start over again). All that truly matters is who the best team is at this given moment. Even the last game played between these two teams is irrelevant because circumstances have changed at least three times over. Lines have shuffled. Players who were injured then are healthy now, and vice versa. Like time, the teams are in a constant state of flux.
Since December, these teams have changed superficially; since 1999 these programs have changed immensely. The change at UMaine is obvious: your coach tragically passed away in 2001 and created an upheaval of seismic proportions. UNH lost a great assistant coach, Brian McCloskey, to the women's hockey program where he has had relatively successful seasons. Furthermore, the hockey teams themselves have graduated 2 full classes of players since then. Most players on the teams now were in elementary school in 1999. Their connections to that game are minimal, if any.
To sum, it is heinous to use our past, which could be likened to Shakespearean tragedy, in order to prop up your insults against our program. The kids playing this year were 5th graders themselves during the Incident in Anaheim. Furthermore, due to the transient nature of time, even Friday night's game will be made irrelevant by the time the puck drops on Saturday night. Though some of the emotions may carry over, the direct impact ANY of our past failures have on our program are, in fact, uncorrelated to the play of our student-athletes.
So be it. I'll have an intelligent discussion on why the past really doesn't matter..