What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NCAA Ruling Regarding Paying Athletes

Endorsements is another loophole then. Dam is breaking
Imagine in football how those offensive linemen, who protect and open the holes for the QBs and running backs, are going to react when the "skill position players" are getting endorsement money, and they aren't getting squat.
 
Imagine in football how those offensive linemen, who protect and open the holes for the QBs and running backs, are going to react when the "skill position players" are getting endorsement money, and they aren't getting squat.
Yes, but now just like in the pros those athletes getting the big dollars will be free to give gifts to their linemen. Might be a Rolex, might be something else... depends on the QB they are protecting.

ed516696f2e99907e8ebafe274dd3525.jpg
 
This really doesn't change anything except now the players can openly benefit instead of having it done under the table. Mississippi State paid Cam Newton a couple hundred grand to play QB there but he went to Auburn instead. What? Do you think he chose Auburn because he likes eagles? Rex Chapman was offered $500K to be put in escrow to be collected after college. All this means is that Jim Montgomery could shoot that eyeglasses commercial he did as a freshman instead of waiting until after his last game as a senior.
 
This really doesn't change anything except now the players can openly benefit instead of having it done under the table. Mississippi State paid Cam Newton a couple hundred grand to play QB there but he went to Auburn instead. What? Do you think he chose Auburn because he likes eagles? Rex Chapman was offered $500K to be put in escrow to be collected after college. All this means is that Jim Montgomery could shoot that eyeglasses commercial he did as a freshman instead of waiting until after his last game as a senior.

Makes you wonder if schools in the big media markets gain an advantage.
 
College sports (at least Football and Basketball and perhaps hockey) have changed forever. What it will look like in the future is anyone's guess. Bball Player at Tenn St. (not a power 5 powerhouse but related to the right person) signed a $2Million endorsement deal. WOW! Even Bo didn't make that kind of money and he was perhaps the best athlete of his generation. In today's world, Bo would know endorsements.

https://247sports.com/Article/Hercy-...ess-167315665/
 
College sports (at least Football and Basketball and perhaps hockey) have changed forever. What it will look like in the future is anyone's guess. Bball Player at Tenn St. (not a power 5 powerhouse but related to the right person) signed a $2Million endorsement deal. WOW! Even Bo didn't make that kind of money and he was perhaps the best athlete of his generation. In today's world, Bo would know endorsements.

https://247sports.com/Article/Hercy-...ess-167315665/

I’m not sure that is legit. Read some stuff on Twitter that made it sound very unlikely.
 
I’m not sure that is legit. Read some stuff on Twitter that made it sound very unlikely.

Yeah, I looked them up with a simple Google search. Their site indicates they are looking to hire an intern for the fall of 2019.
 
Makes you wonder if schools in the big media markets gain an advantage.

Maybe, maybe not. It would make sense but those schools near large media markets have always had that advantage. Plus in today's connected world everywhere is a media market. You can be in Timbuktu but thanks to social media you can still be a star the same as if you're in New York City. The brands will find you and throw money at you no matter where you are.
 
Maybe, maybe not. It would make sense but those schools near large media markets have always had that advantage. Plus in today's connected world everywhere is a media market. You can be in Timbuktu but thanks to social media you can still be a star the same as if you're in New York City. The brands will find you and throw money at you no matter where you are.

I'm not to sure about that. All this ruling allows is for student athletes to profit from their name, likeness, and image. But will they be able to do it wearing their school's uniform, logo, or mascot? Without it, will they be as recognizable? It wouldn't surprise me if this whole thing ends up being a financial boon for the schools as well (or instead).
 
I'm not to sure about that. All this ruling allows is for student athletes to profit from their name, likeness, and image. But will they be able to do it wearing their school's uniform, logo, or mascot? Without it, will they be as recognizable? It wouldn't surprise me if this whole thing ends up being a financial boon for the schools as well (or instead).

Put the Alabama QB in a generic maroon uniform and I'm fairly certain people will get the message. But that is a solid point. I wouldn't be shocked if there are already legal advisors at top Power 5 schools telling the ADs how to write it into scholarship offers that students have to wear school gear in advertisements - and thus the lion's share of the advertising dollars will flow to the schools.

The QB at Oklahoma, Spencer Rattler (a name straight out of central casting) has signed with Steinberg Sports and is doing Cameo (?) videos at $1000 a pop. Imagine how much money these guys can rake in on social media platforms like Twitch and YouTube.
 
I'm not to sure about that. All this ruling allows is for student athletes to profit from their name, likeness, and image. But will they be able to do it wearing their school's uniform, logo, or mascot? Without it, will they be as recognizable? It wouldn't surprise me if this whole thing ends up being a financial boon for the schools as well (or instead).

One of the SiriusXM channels was talking about this and noted that some state legislatures have banned use of state school logos for personal gain. So the answer to your question is: it depends.
 
One of the SiriusXM channels was talking about this and noted that some state legislatures have banned use of state school logos for personal gain. So the answer to your question is: it depends.

I don't think a student athlete will be able to use their school's uniform, logo, mascot, etc. At least not without the school's permission and likely a cut of the payment.

I can see the more innovative schools continue to use their student athletes and share the cash. That might be a good recruiting tool.
 
Back
Top