Re: NCAA era Program rankings-accomplishments only
And yet you expect the college hockey world to give up an extra dollop of respect to Minnesota for this amazing, principled stand, which according to the numbers Shirtless Guy has provided, extends to exactly one sport of one gender? Spare us.
Honestly, I don't expect anything from you. lol
The college hockey world, and more importantly, the HOCKEY WORLD has already given Minnesota a whole big heap of extra respect. I doubt any other school will EVER catch Minnesota when it comes to the # of Hockey Hall of Famers they have, or the # of US Hockey Hall of Famers they have, or the # of Olympic Hall of Famers they have, or the # of Gold Medals that they've won, or the # of coaches given the honor to coach Olympic teams.
Though its only an Individual honor, Minnesota's 4 Hobey Baker winners is tops last I heard? I even read somewhere that the Hobey Baker Trophy was modeled after a Gopher player.
And the NHL seems to appreciate Minnesota, as they are the team most looked to when drafting talent to its teams. They are #1 last I checked in the # of players having played in the NHL, and I checked the official #s through 2011 I believe.
So you go ahead and give Minnesota nothing, for nothing is needed from you.
And that policy I mentioned does not extend to one sport of one gender either.
I know of at least a half a dozen Gopher teams dominated by Minnesotans.
85% of the Women's Soccer team are from Minnesota.
69% of the Men's Baseball team are from Minnesota.
66% of the Men's Cross-Country team are from Minnesota.
61% of the Women's Softball team are from Minnesota.
58% of the Men's Track team are from Minnesota.
58% of the Women's BB team are from Minnesota.
And of course,
85% of the Men's Hockey team are from Minnesota.
And Women's hockey, presently has 55% of its team members from Minnesota, but with 9 of its next 11 recruits coming in being from Minnesota, and replacing 7 out of staters, that will drive the percentage back up to 77%.
3 more are just one player above or below 50%. Women's Tennis, Men's Golf and Women's CC.
Women's Track is at 47%.
Mens Wrestling is at 44%.
Women's S&D is at 43%.
Women's Row is at 42%.
Women's VB, Men's BB, Men's Fb are all at 33%. And 33% is a healthy % for sports that pay all the bills for all the other sports.
Well, VB might pay for itself, or not be as big of a burden as all the other minor sports.
That's 19 of the 23 sports.
Out of the 4 remaining sports, 3 of them, Women's Golf, Women's Gym and Men's Gymnastics were 3 of the 4 sports that were going to get cut at the same time Men's Golf was going to get cut.
But what is that? Cutting the sports doing the LEAST amount of good for the tax paying residents of Minnesota?!
Yeah. Go figure, that doesn't make ANY SENSE. Unless of course you acknowledge that what I am arguing is a valid point, then it makes a lot of sense. Then it makes perfect sense.
And the team with the most Minnesotans on the squad of those 4 sports that were going to get cut, depended on those Minnesotans to help them win a Natl Title, which inspired other Minnesotans who love their golf(one of the top rated states in per capita golfers) to donate money to save Men's Golf. But it was a package deal, so the money had to be raised to save all 4 sports and it was.