facepalm.
You could not be more wrong. They can flip the comparison with UW this weekend.
Chuck, isn't it funny how easily you can annoy rodents.
How does MN flip the comparison with Wisconsin, even with a sweep, this weekend?
Doesn't Wisconsin lead the comparison 3-1 right now? If MN sweeps, it's 3-3, but doesn't everyone assume RPI is the tiebreaker? I haven't done the math, but does a sweep for MN this weekend automatically result in MN making up a pretty substantial deficit in the RPI?
How does MN flip the comparison with Wisconsin, even with a sweep, this weekend?
Doesn't Wisconsin lead the comparison 3-1 right now? If MN sweeps, it's 3-3, but doesn't everyone assume RPI is the tiebreaker? I haven't done the math, but does a sweep for MN this weekend automatically result in MN making up a pretty substantial deficit in the RPI?
One more, just for fun...
![]()
One more, just for fun...
![]()
One more, just for fun...
![]()
Pay attention to the bolded part of what you said - it's rather important. Given the league standings right now, there's a pretty strong chance that UW's next 8 games (9 if the first round goes to a third game) will be against TUCs. If they reach the Final Five, that'll add at least another game to that total. They certainly have plenty of opportunity to move up - while I don't have time at the moment to dig deeper into the comparisons and see just how far they can move, my off the cuff guess is if they run the table and win the Final Five, they'd probably be sitting around 7th-8th in the pairwise and be a #2 seed. At the other end, if they lose all their remaining games, they would probably be somewhere close to the TUC cliff.Every team UW plays might be TUC's, but they are all below them in in the Pairwise. Regardless of what happens at the end of the regular season, UW will be a bubble team. The WCHA playoffs will be a critical time for Bucky, the playoffs will be the only opportunity to beat a team that could give them a jump.
Pay attention to the bolded part of what you said - it's rather important. Given the league standings right now, there's a pretty strong chance that UW's next 8 games (9 if the first round goes to a third game) will be against TUCs. If they reach the Final Five, that'll add at least another game to that total. They certainly have plenty of opportunity to move up - while I don't have time at the moment to dig deeper into the comparisons and see just how far they can move, my off the cuff guess is if they run the table and win the Final Five, they'd probably be sitting around 7th-8th in the pairwise and be a #2 seed. At the other end, if they lose all their remaining games, they would probably be somewhere close to the TUC cliff.
How high a team is ranked has nothing to do with how much of a "boost" they get in the pairwise. Beating any TUC is valuable. Beating the strongest TUCs is only slightly more valuable (due to RPI considerations). The route of least resistance is to play and beat a bunch of the weaker TUCs - and UW gets to face three of them down the stretch (and possibly/probably one of the same three in the first round of the playoffs).
Winning a game against a TUC never hurts a team - as long as the opponent remains a TUC. Even if the win pushes the team off the TUC cliff and out of consideration, whether or not it hurts the team that beat them depends on what is governing their comparisons (if they're winning comparisons despite their TUC record and/or losing other comparisons because of it already, then hurting that record further isn't going to matter). Further complicating this is the fact RPI breaks tied comparisons - and losing intentionally, even if it's beneficial to the TUC record, is certainly going to hurt the RPI category.In the not so perfect system it can hurt a team as well.
No posts in this thread this morning? What are you guys getting soft? F-Minnesota. Bucky get's 2 points tonight.