What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I used to get yelled at for posting constantly and now I get yelled at for not posting enough. How times change.

I would like to yell at you again for posting too much. Please stop that and go back to hiding out.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Chasing Rau around for 20 minutes will do it. Minnesota has this one in the bag.
Rau is the only one that hustles. It shouldn't be that hard to keep up with one guy while the others are all dogging it.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Was gonna hang out in this thread for a bit but I should probably stay away, keep tripping over giant bags of sand on both sides of the aisle
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

This is going to be a long week watching this.

"You guys will win."
"No, you guys will win."
"I think you'll get the sweep."
"No way, you're going to sweep us."

*sigh* :(
 
This is going to be a long week watching this.

"You guys will win."
"No, you guys will win."
"I think you'll get the sweep."
"No way, you're going to sweep us."

*sigh* :(

If there was a way for both teams to get swept, I think these teams would find a way of doing it this weekend. It's going to be a clinic on poor hockey IMO.
 
Quick, you better tell Donna to spread the word that you aren't going to post here anymore, then show up again 2-3 weeks after we sweep your poor excuse of a hockey team. Seems to be your M.O. this year.

So after the goofs swept UND at home Dirty was "alluding" the threads? He-haw dubbs, he-haw!
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

It was a simple question. You disappeared right around the time of the last Gophers vs Sioux series, and Donna mentioned in the thread that you were "done with this board". A few weeks after the series, you show back up.

Man, you are creepy.
1. You keep referring to me by my first name. It's not a secret, neither is my last name, it's not like I am in the witness protection program, but it is weird.
2. You remember verbatim all 2000-ish posts that I have written.
3. You talk about my panties. Are you going to ask if my mother laid them out for me, too?

Are you boiling a bunny right now?
 
Man, you are creepy.
1. You keep referring to me by my first name. It's not a secret, neither is my last name, it's not like I am in the witness protection program, but it is weird.
2. You remember verbatim all 2000-ish posts that I have written.
3. You talk about my panties. Are you going to ask if my mother laid them out for me, too?

Are you boiling a bunny right now?

I hate your screen name, and as you admitted, you've made your name no secret, so I use it instead. And don't flatter yourself. "get your panties in a bundle" is a common expression. Don't worry, I've seen your picture as well (also something an attention whore like you hasn't kept private) and I'm not interested. In the least.

By the way, have you noticed everything I have said to you has been in response to something you have said about me (a part from mentioning that you said Dirty was leaving the board). Who's the stalker?

Here's a novel concept. If you don't want me talking to or about you, then stop talking to or about me. I would prefer that arrangement.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I hate your screen name, and as you admitted, you've made your name no secret, so I use it instead. And don't flatter yourself. "get your panties in a bundle" is a common expression. Don't worry, I've seen your picture as well (also something an attention whore like you hasn't kept private) and I'm not interested. In the least.

By the way, have you noticed everything I have said to you has been in response to something you have said about me (a part from mentioning that you said Dirty was leaving the board). Who's the stalker?

Here's a novel concept. If you don't want me talking to or about you, then stop talking to or about me. I would prefer that arrangement.

Honey. You are in this thread, which I was not in, talking about me. You are in love with me. Even though I am uggo and chubby and a ginormous *****, you still are! It is really odd. I don't even remember what you're talking about, as far as Dirty leaving the board. What thread is that in? You recall it in perfect clarity. I can't even remember what the context was, and I'm the one who said it.

I don't want to stop talking to you, because you are a great source of entertainment for me as well as many other posters who enjoy trainwrecks. Dance, monkey, dance!

If you don't like typing out Runninwiththedogs, RWD is fine.
 
Honey. You are in this thread, which I was not in, talking about me. You are in love with me. Even though I am uggo and chubby and a ginormous *****, you still are! It is really odd. I don't even remember what you're talking about, as far as Dirty leaving the board. What thread is that in? You recall it in perfect clarity. I can't even remember what the context was, and I'm the one who said it.

I don't want to stop talking to you, because you are a great source of entertainment for me as well as many other posters who enjoy trainwrecks. Dance, monkey, dance!

If you don't like typing out Runninwiththedogs, RWD is fine.

For God sakes, the only reason I even mentioned you was because you were the one that said Dirty was taking his puck bag and going home.

If you don't want to stop talking to me, you're going to keep getting responses Donna. Doesn't bother me. I thought the reason we were even having this discussion was because it got your thongs in a bunch.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Some friends of mine, and my other half take all the kids to the Ralph for this series whenever the Gophs play there, this has been the best rivalry since I can remember, the conference reallignment pretty closely resembles how hockey fans in the midwest has changed over the last 40yrs.. Good thing for everyone that this board only reflects maybe 1/2 of 1 percent of any fanbase and going to the games isn't quite as obnoxious.

I dont care if you're a Gopher or Sioux fan, away from this board its two of the best hockey fanbases in all of college hockey and just as theres plenty of hating going on theres alot of respect between the two, and it will be a greatly missed rivalry.

RWD, you may not like this but every Gopher fan that I know has always supported the BD's and every BD fan I know thinks the same way (when the two programs are out of the hunt). I know you'd maybe lose some board cred for admitting this, but you're in the minority with your over the top Gopher hate. And its just not "cool" to be a Goph fan.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

RWD, you may not like this but every Gopher fan that I know has always supported the BD's and every BD fan I know thinks the same way (when the two programs are out of the hunt). I know you'd maybe lose some board cred for admitting this, but you're in the minority with your over the top Gopher hate. And its just not "cool" to be a Goph fan.

It is totally uncool to be a Gopher fan! I am glad you mentioned that! I mean, look at your fanbase! It's like... Lou Nanne and Jupiter! Nerds who are older than dirt!

I'm not sure where your comments coming from. JDubbs is being a weirdo, I'm mentioning it. I haven't really mocked the Gophers much lately. Other than on Twitter I asked what the U-18 team beating NE would do to your PWR, but that was it. Oh, I said some negative things about Pukestad (and also call him Pukestad) at the WJC but I expected great things from him (among others). It's true, I don't like the Gophers, and while I do enjoy the Gopher fans with whom I am friends, and who also have fun cheering for the Bulldogs, but how can one NOT enjoy cheering for the Bulldogs? It's just a big party. You're kind of coming from left field as this whole JDubbs thing is in response to him bringing me up in this thread, in which I was not participating, and also creepily slobbering over me whilst professing his undying hatred. It doesn't have anything to do with him being a Gopher fan.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Agreed. Only complete losers are Gopher fans.

And judging by your posts, what category would you put yourself in?

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here.. Grew up in ND, mid 30's or so, lives in MPLS, a little burnt out, smokes a littel to much herb,probably works in a headshop or other retail store couple DUI's under his belt, Blackhawks fan and just about hates everything MN out of spite? I may have even tossed ya in the drunk tank once or twice eh?
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

And judging by your posts, what category would you put yourself in?

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here.. Grew up in ND, mid 30's or so, lives in MPLS, a little burnt out, smokes a littel to much herb,probably works in a headshop or other retail store couple DUI's under his belt, Blackhawks fan and just about hates everything MN out of spite? I may have even tossed ya in the drunk tank once or twice eh?
SWING and a miss!
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

And judging by your posts, what category would you put yourself in?

I'm going to take a shot in the dark here.. Grew up in ND, mid 30's or so, lives in MPLS, a little burnt out, smokes a littel to much herb,probably works in a headshop or other retail store couple DUI's under his belt, Blackhawks fan and just about hates everything MN out of spite? I may have even tossed ya in the drunk tank once or twice eh?

And the answers are.....No, no, no, no, no, no, no, kinda (partial credit), no. And by your last sentence, am I to understand that you are mall security at Rosedale? Either way, no.

So tallying up your score, you get 10% at best. That's pretty poor.
 
Back
Top