100% yes
Because taking up so much of your salary by one player is a bad bet. It’s always been a bad bet. In basketball, fine. You have five guys. In every other sport there’s no way a single player can make that big of an impact.
In the NL over the past ten seasons, the Dodgers have had the highest paid player in the league six times and the Mets four times. The Dodgers won their division each year they had the highest paid player, the Mets were cat litter.
Because taking up so much of your salary by one player is a bad bet. It’s always been a bad bet. In basketball, fine. You have five guys. In every other sport there’s no way a single player can make that big of an impact.
Same number of WS appearances* (1) and titles (0).
* Edit: forgot LA was in 2017 too. A forgettable team, to be honest.
Same number of WS appearances* (1) and titles (0).
* Edit: forgot LA was in 2017 too. A forgettable team, to be honest.
Because taking up so much of your salary by one player is a bad bet.
So don't do that. If you are going to sign Harper then pay a metric sh-t ton of money to people to surround him. Exemplar: the Yankees.
As somebody pointed out, there's no salary cap and if you're the MLB equivalent of the Saudis you don't give a sh-t about the luxury tax. You just raise the Yes subscription price.
I think the rule we have learned about free agency is: don't half as-s it. Either plead poverty and milk your city and fans for cheapo dollars while putting sh-t on the field (30% of the ML), or go all in and rake it in (Boston, NY(A), LA, Chi (N), and now good lord maybe Philadelphia???) Both models work. What doesn't work is skimping and then covering yourself by paying one big dawg.
What doesn't work is San Diego signing Machado. That's f-cking stupid. Unless they sign Harper and trade the farm for Thor.
Kind of jealous/disappointed Josh Harrison is going to the Tigers. Always liked him.
100% yes
Money isn’t an issue for the Twins ownership and there’s no salary cap. They could pay Harper to be the face of their franchise the next 10 years, right as he’s coming into his prime. They’d still have the ability to walk away from him when he’s age 36, and add him to a pretty decent young roster. Not to mention it would FINALLY show the fans they’re serious about trying to win.
Per Jon Heyman, the Great Bryce Mystery is solved. Philly.
So after months of bloviation... exactly what everybody expected from the first.
We'll see just how "Stupid Money" it's for...
330 Big Ones, again per Heyman. 13 years. No opt-outs.
We'll see just how "Stupid Money" it's for...
330 Big Ones, again per Heyman. 13 years. No opt-outs.