Re: Minnesota Women's Hockey 2015-2016: Confection Free
I am sure the Minnesota goaler would want another look at each of those shots but those were all quality goals.
On a couple, I think that would be her first look at the shot; it looked like she was screened on the last two.
Over the course of most seasons of GWH, one constant seems to be that when the coaches decide that the game is under control and the fourth line starts to get a regular shift, the level of play drops. Partly, I think the team sees what we all see and does relax a bit. But also, that means that the rest of the players aren't getting out there in the same rotation that they were as the lead was being built. Women's hockey isn't like men's hockey where a team needs the break that a fourth line can provide, in part because they don't have to absorb body checks all game, and also because they are used to playing heavy minutes throughout their careers. I think fourth lines play to develop depth for the future and to build team morale. It doesn't make a team better in that moment. It's not the fourth line's fault, but the team usually won't look as sharp skating four lines as they do skating three. The one year where I thought that was not the case was 2008-09, when the fourth line was pretty good and always brought good energy. There were periods that I thought it was the team's best line. There will be games where the opposition is so defeated that they are just waiting for the final buzzer and don't seem to know what Minnesota line is out there.
Today, even when BSU was rallying, it wasn't like they were suddenly taking it to the Gophers. There were shifts earlier in the game where the Beavers had Minnesota trapped in their own end the whole time, but the Gophers often had the majority of the puck possession even the. Bemidji has some very good players; they will make teams look bad at times. But the BSU goals came on a nice shot in transition after most of the shift was spent in Bemidji's zone, a PP goal, and a goal where the Minn. fourth line was out.
I was very encouraged today. Having watched The Line for a season plus a month of another, I know what having a dominant top line can do for a team's chances. The PK where Potomak kept setting up Brandt only to have Mowat rob her a couple of times showed me just how dominant they might be if everything clicks. I'm not worried about Cameranesi. She was able to excel playing with two vastly different centers in Terry and Brandt. I think she'll have success with anyone. But if 22 and 26 start to instinctively know what the other one is going to do, then look out, because there will be a lot of third periods where the Gophers don't look as good protecting a big lead as they did in building it.