JF_Gophers
2147483647
Its funny that he gives all this analysis and then always sums it up with some form of "if the gophers play well..."
Could of saved 3 paragraphs if you just skipped right to your point.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
- Thread starter Driftryder
- Start date
Could of saved 3 paragraphs if you just skipped right to your point.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
You mean goals. Assists only count for personal statistics.
You mean goals. Assists only count for personal statistics.
Wisko McBadgerton
Teaching you how to Bucky.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Unless they tie. It's not Thunderdome rules. Aussies can't skate.
Unless they tie. It's not Thunderdome rules. Aussies can't skate.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
I didn't know Wisconsin was in Australia...it does explain a few things.
I didn't know Wisconsin was in Australia...it does explain a few things.
gopher wes
Dammit, Gorilla!!
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
And, generally speaking, the team that scores the most goals wins.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
It is a Basketball arena, so I can see where you would get points and goals confused.
It is a Basketball arena, so I can see where you would get points and goals confused.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
I was talking in the general sports sense...since SanTropez just said team, not hockey team. Correct, in hockey and individual will get a point for a goal or an assist. However, the team only gets points for goals. These are what go up on the scoreboard and determine the winner.
I was talking in the general sports sense...since SanTropez just said team, not hockey team. Correct, in hockey and individual will get a point for a goal or an assist. However, the team only gets points for goals. These are what go up on the scoreboard and determine the winner.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
You didn't? "Down Under" by Men at Work is basically our fight song!
You didn't? "Down Under" by Men at Work is basically our fight song!
ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Unless it's a tie.
Then the Big Ten will have us jerk out a skills competition in order for someone to get an extra point for no good reason.
Unless it's a tie.
Then the Big Ten will have us jerk out a skills competition in order for someone to get an extra point for no good reason.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Do not disparage Australia by lumping in Wisconsinites with them.
Australians drink good beer! (not that Fosters Crap, but VB!)
Australians don't speak with a funny accent
Australians treat cheese for what it is, not part of the basic 2 food groups
Australians purposefully drive on the left side of the road
The only similarity is that the country colors of Australia happen to resemble "That Team That Shan't Be Named"
Do not disparage Australia by lumping in Wisconsinites with them.
Australians drink good beer! (not that Fosters Crap, but VB!)
Australians don't speak with a funny accent
Australians treat cheese for what it is, not part of the basic 2 food groups
Australians purposefully drive on the left side of the road
The only similarity is that the country colors of Australia happen to resemble "That Team That Shan't Be Named"
ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Says the guy from a city that produced Pig's Eye.
Says the guy from a city that produced Pig's Eye.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
You need to get out of Geinville more often...
You need to get out of Geinville more often...
Wisko McBadgerton
Teaching you how to Bucky.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
So, wondering now if mustache Eaves and mullet Lucia had entered the Thunderdome, who would have come out?
I don't know for sure... Mustache Eaves was a much better athlete, but mullet haired Lucia was sneaky and smelled funny.
So, wondering now if mustache Eaves and mullet Lucia had entered the Thunderdome, who would have come out?
I don't know for sure... Mustache Eaves was a much better athlete, but mullet haired Lucia was sneaky and smelled funny.
Wisko McBadgerton
Teaching you how to Bucky.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Not to interrupt this fabulous flow with hockey, but reportedly, here the Badgers lines for tonight with Rumpel in goal:
Forwards
Kerdiles-Zengerle-Little
Zulinick-Dahl-Mersch
Navin-LaBate-Besse
Paape-Meuer-Soleway.
Blue Liners
Schulze-Simonelli
McCabe-Faust
Wittchow-Drake
New combinations up front with Barnes out and Kerdiles back in.
Not to interrupt this fabulous flow with hockey, but reportedly, here the Badgers lines for tonight with Rumpel in goal:
Forwards
Kerdiles-Zengerle-Little
Zulinick-Dahl-Mersch
Navin-LaBate-Besse
Paape-Meuer-Soleway.
Blue Liners
Schulze-Simonelli
McCabe-Faust
Wittchow-Drake
New combinations up front with Barnes out and Kerdiles back in.
WiscTJK
Well-known member
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Soleway should be up on the first line and Little the fourth IMO.
Soleway should be up on the first line and Little the fourth IMO.
ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Little does feel like a mish-mash on the top line. I do feel like he's capable of scoring some workman-like goals around the net (like Mersch with less skill), but it still seems like we're asking too much of him. And I say that as an unabashed Little Bros. fan.
Little does feel like a mish-mash on the top line. I do feel like he's capable of scoring some workman-like goals around the net (like Mersch with less skill), but it still seems like we're asking too much of him. And I say that as an unabashed Little Bros. fan.
Wisko McBadgerton
Teaching you how to Bucky.
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
Little's not up there to score. He's up there to get it out of the corners, play both ends, and most importantly, not turn the puck over. Jed has the physical skills, but he's still a post Christmas freshman. I like Soleway but if the game's on the line, I'll take my chances with Little's heart and maturity to get it done.
EDIT: Let me add this, I trust what Little is going to bring every shift, regardless of the score or situation. Jed's maybe more of a gamble that way only because he's young and less experienced.
I like how Navin's been playing and I think he'll give the 3rd line a boost with possession. And I like that we're talking about whether a player should play 1st or 4th line. Nice problem to have.
Little's not up there to score. He's up there to get it out of the corners, play both ends, and most importantly, not turn the puck over. Jed has the physical skills, but he's still a post Christmas freshman. I like Soleway but if the game's on the line, I'll take my chances with Little's heart and maturity to get it done.
EDIT: Let me add this, I trust what Little is going to bring every shift, regardless of the score or situation. Jed's maybe more of a gamble that way only because he's young and less experienced.
I like how Navin's been playing and I think he'll give the 3rd line a boost with possession. And I like that we're talking about whether a player should play 1st or 4th line. Nice problem to have.
Last edited:
WiscTJK
Well-known member
Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: 2/6 & 2/7
He's almost 20, so I don't think post Christmas freshman applies. Also, he is like 4th in total shots on the team, so he has the offensive game to match that line. Plus he is physical, much like Little. Nothing against Little, I love watching him on the ice.
Maybe it is a defensive decision rather than offensive.
He's almost 20, so I don't think post Christmas freshman applies. Also, he is like 4th in total shots on the team, so he has the offensive game to match that line. Plus he is physical, much like Little. Nothing against Little, I love watching him on the ice.
Maybe it is a defensive decision rather than offensive.