What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesota @ UNO 2/25/2012

Re: Minnesota @ UNO 2/25/2012

I think it probably was a goal, but with the initial call being no-goal, that would be really hard to overturn with the replay.
 
Steve_MN said:
I think it probably was a goal, but with the initial call being no-goal, that would be really hard to overturn with the replay.
Click to expand...

Possibly. If the call in the ice was goal it probably stands for the same reason it was waved off; No evidence overturning the call.
 
Re: Minnesota @ UNO 2/25/2012

Koho said:
UMD leads 1-0.

TV announcers on top of their game. UMD comes down and hits post, gets another shot but whistle blows for net being off. The refs go to review the shot (off post) and the announcers start talking about maybe the second shot was a goal "because CC knocked their own net off". They show the replay about 6 times and it is as clear as day that a UMD player gets checked after taking a shot and crashes into the net, knocking it off. Yet they continue to talk about CC knocking it off. Secondly, the last shot, the one after the whistle, never even goes in the net anyway. How can two people so ignorant about hockey be paid to announce.

Correction, a Swartz scored . 1-1.
Click to expand...

The one guy used to play at UMD, he is OK. The main talker is *hostile and abusive comment deleted.*
 
Re: Minnesota @ UNO 2/25/2012

UNO Penalty.

How was that not a 5 for a penalty they clearly missed before this one was call.
 
Re: Minnesota @ UNO 2/25/2012

Huh. A little surprised I guess. On the replay I understand, though.
 
state of hockey said:
Possibly. If the call in the ice was goal it probably stands for the same reason it was waved off; No evidence overturning the call.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Real time, I did NOT think it was a goal, and the TV had a better angle than Shep had. On the review, it looked to me like the puck was in before the net came loose, but I can't by any stretch say that it was enough to overturn the onice call.

And another missed CFB. Surprise, surprise.

EDIT: OR contact to the head, either way. On the plus side, andother PP goal on the blown 5 minute call.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top