What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

ScoobyDoo said:
Also, if they fed her alcohol and she was drunk then there can be no consent.
Click to expand...

Which was pretty much an every weekend thing "back in the day" (minus video cameras of course)

I'm just glad everyone wasn't all uptight and pc back when I was in HS.
 
Last edited:
The Exiled One said:
Again, I don't know about the involvement of alcohol, but I think violating the girl's expectation of privacy is worthy of ALL SORTS of punishment. That is a humiliating experience. Two games is a slap on the wrist compared to the emotional damage that girl potentially suffered.
Click to expand...

2 games isn't as small when you think about playing 25 games. It's morally wrong, yes, but is it illegal? Maybe trespassing? Not sure exactly what else you could say?
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

MavHockey14 said:
2 games isn't as small when you think about playing 25 games. It's morally wrong, yes, but is it illegal? Maybe trespassing? Not sure exactly what else you could say?
Click to expand...
Not only is it illegal, it's a felony...

609.746 INTERFERENCE WITH PRIVACY.
Subdivision 1. Surreptitious intrusion; observation device. (a) A person is guilty of
a gross misdemeanor who:
(1) enters upon another's property;
(2) surreptitiously gazes, stares, or peeps in the window or any other aperture of a house or
place of dwelling of another; and
(3) does so with intent to intrude upon or interfere with the privacy of a member of the
household.
(b) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who:
(1) enters upon another's property;
(2) surreptitiously installs or uses any device for observing, photographing, recording,
amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events through the window or any other aperture of a house
or place of dwelling of another; and
(3) does so with intent to intrude upon or interfere with the privacy of a member of the
household.
(c) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who:
(1) surreptitiously gazes, stares, or peeps in the window or other aperture of a sleeping
room in a hotel, as defined in section 327.70, subdivision 3, a tanning booth, or other place
where a reasonable person would have an expectation of privacy and has exposed or is likely to
expose their intimate parts, as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 5, or the clothing covering
the immediate area of the intimate parts; and
(2) does so with intent to intrude upon or interfere with the privacy of the occupant.
(d) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who:
(1) surreptitiously installs or uses any device for observing, photographing, recording,
amplifying, or broadcasting sounds or events through the window or other aperture of a sleeping
room in a hotel, as defined in section 327.70, subdivision 3, a tanning booth, or other place
where a reasonable person would have an expectation of privacy and has exposed or is likely to
expose their intimate parts, as defined in section 609.341, subdivision 5, or the clothing covering
the immediate area of the intimate parts; and
(2) does so with intent to intrude upon or interfere with the privacy of the occupant.
(e) A person is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than
two years or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both, if the person:
(1) violates this subdivision after a previous conviction under this subdivision or section
609.749; or
(2) violates this subdivision against a minor under the age of 18, knowing or having reason
to know that the minor is present.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

New rule in Wisconsin HS hockey this year - if your team accumulates 3 checking from behind penalties in a year, your team is ineligible for post-season play. So far, 2 teams (I'll try to find out which) are already ineligible. Does this seem like a good rule? I vote no.
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

MadTownSioux said:
New rule in Wisconsin HS hockey this year - if your team accumulates 3 checking from behind penalties in a year, your team is ineligible for post-season play. So far, 2 teams (I'll try to find out which) are already ineligible. Does this seem like a good rule? I vote no.
Click to expand...
NJ has a rule where if a player gets 2 DQ's in a season he's done for the post season. If a team gets 3 DQ's, the team's ineligible for the state tourny. This is for all sports.

In WI, is it 3 CFB DQ's or just 3 CFB's?
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

joecct said:
NJ has a rule where if a player gets 2 DQ's in a season he's done for the post season. If a team gets 3 DQ's, the team's ineligible for the state tourny. This is for all sports.

In WI, is it 3 CFB DQ's or just 3 CFB's?
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure it's the former
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

Mr Hockey finalists were announced today:
Grant Besse-F/Benilde-St. Margaret's
Dan Labosky-F/Benilde-St. Margaret's
T.J. Roo-F/Totino-Grace
Adam Johnson-F/Hibbing
Zach Lavalle-F/Hill-Murray
Zach Glienke-F/Eagan
Jake Jackson-F/Tartan
Parker Reno-D/Edina
Jake Bischoff-D/Grand Rapids
Tommy Vannelli-D/Minnetonka

Current Top 10:
Class AA
1) Hill-Murray 18-2-1
2) Benilde-St. Margaret’S 15-5-0
3) Duluth East 18-4-0
4) Minnetonka 15-5-1
5) Edina 17-5-0
6) Wayzata 17-4-0
7) Eagan 17-3-1
8) Blaine 15-4-1
9) Grand Rapids 15-4-3
10) Centennial 15-4-2

Class A
1) St. Thomas Academy 17-1-1
2) Breck 17-3-1
3) Hermantown 17-4-1
4) East Grand Forks 18-2-3
5) Totino-Grace 15-5-1
6) St. Cloud Cathedral 16-6-0
7) Rochester Lourdes 14-7-0
8) Thief River Falls 13-8-0
9) Duluth Denfeld 15-7-0
10) Warroad 16-6-2
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

Thanks for the info. Lot of the same teams at the top as when I lived in the Twin Cities.
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

Does anyone know where to find video highlights of HS games? the game that Shirtless and I were at last night (STA vs. Tartan) looked like it was being broadcast on the web, there was a camera setup, and a play-by-play guy calling the game, but I can't seem to find where it was broadcast, much less find any highlights from that camera we were standing next to.
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

bigblue_dl said:
Does anyone know where to find video highlights of HS games? the game that Shirtless and I were at last night (STA vs. Tartan) looked like it was being broadcast on the web, there was a camera setup, and a play-by-play guy calling the game, but I can't seem to find where it was broadcast, much less find any highlights from that camera we were standing next to.
Click to expand...
There isn't a highlight cut up of the game but it was broadcast by MNSportNetwork and here is the full video:
http://www.meridix.com/mbp/hockey/index.php?liveid=msbnchannel1&recordid=36527
 
Last edited:
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

Two schools have agreed to use wood sticks in the regular season finale this Saturday. Mounds View and North St. Paul will play with wood sticks, goalies included.

Article
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

goldy_331 said:
Two schools have agreed to use wood sticks in the regular season finale this Saturday. Mounds View and North St. Paul will play with wood sticks, goalies included.

Article
Click to expand...


“I think it will be fun and exciting,” Bjorklund said. “We are a little nervous, because nobody really knows what to expect at this point.”

Added Thomas: “You are going to see some crazy passes, and heads up because I don’t know where the shots are going to go. I think it is going to be a fun night.”
Click to expand...

This quote is pretty amusing and telling, "crazy passes"? "don't know where shots are going to go"?

huh? we all used wooden sticks just fine throughout the 80's, me thinks junior has been 'brainwashed" by all the OMFGBHDJDTYEB those composite sticks are WAY BETTER!
 
Re: Minnesota High School Hockey 2012-2013

SanTropez said:
This quote is pretty amusing and telling, "crazy passes"? "don't know where shots are going to go"?

huh? we all used wooden sticks just fine throughout the 80's, me thinks junior has been 'brainwashed" by all the OMFGBHDJDTYEB those composite sticks are WAY BETTER!
Click to expand...
Have you ever used composite sticks? I made the switch from wood to composite sticks and I can tell you that it's a big change. They handle entirely different from one another. They're going to underestimate the angle of their passes and shots. Comps are much more responsive, so you produce less torque through your body than with wood sticks, and let the comp stick takeover to give your shot that little extra snap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top