MavHockey14
New member
It isn't support, it is the cost of the bus. Way out of line! I can get a hotel, gas and tickets for half the expense.
Exactly what I did. My hotel for two nights instead of one was $70.50 per person in our group.
It isn't support, it is the cost of the bus. Way out of line! I can get a hotel, gas and tickets for half the expense.
You're right, RIT had four whole chances to play a top 20 (PWR) team this season, what was I thinking?![]()
I calculated where RIT would have been had they lost only 4 conference games (same as Minnesota State). I changed there last 5 conference losses to wins. Then I assumed they won non conference games against Minnesota (easily could have happened, took UMTC to overtime) and assumed that they won against Yale.
All other games with all other teams were assumed to have the same results.
RIT would have finished a respectable 17th in the Pairwise.
Don't tell me the schedule works against the AHC.
With RIT already making a frozen four its kind of selfish of them to try and stop our first attempt. New York hospitality at its finest.....![]()
I'm not a math guy so maybe you nerds at RIT can help me out. I'm sympathetic to your argument that there's a bootstrapping effect in the Pairwise that keeps AHA teams down (and this year appears to have elevated a couple NCHC teams), but how would you fix it? Dumb it down for me, if you could
Well, would you not expect that kind of record from most of the top 15 PWR teams if they had played your schedule, with 28 games against Atlantic Hockey opponents? I would.Wait a second? Are you telling me that in order to finish out of the tournament, "all" RIT would have to do is go 26-7-5, beat two of the three teams they played the entire year to make the NCAA tournament, and win or tie every league game they play from November 22nd through the end of the year? You've converted me. I'm a believer in the PWR!
Agreed, but I do want to point out that Pairwise is really a flawed statistic when evaluating AHC teams. Too few OOC games, too many games against conference opponents with a terrible pairwise. Even the best teams will lose some games in conference throughout the season.
It was a serious suggestion. Harvard's 4 (maybe 5) largely OOC wins against ranked teams in the Nov - early Dec run was what took them from way way down in the rankings to #1 PWR. Not a lot of games, they just happened to win them. The ECAC's overall OOC performance was not great this year either, as I understand it.
Well, would you not expect that kind of record from most of the top 15 PWR teams if they had played your schedule, with 28 games against Atlantic Hockey opponents? I would.
When is the last time an AHA team actually made the tourney with a legit top 16 pairwise ranking?
You are the one who is saying too few OOC games hurts you. You do need to win OOC games. I used for my example 2 games that RIT could have won. We get the same number of OOC games (actually 2 more because we travel to Alaska), and you have admitted that your conference opponents have a terrible pairwise.
And did you forget that RIT won the conference tournament. They are in whether their pairwise ranking is 1st, 17th, or 50th. That is the way that every single team can make the tournament. Has nothing to do with Pairwise.
OK I give up.All I was trying to illustrate is that the gap between 1 and 38 might be a bit misleading.
According to that hopeless shill Dave Starman, if you are not in the nacho you are losing. sigh. Is objectivity too much to ask for?
Though in his defense he said uno would only win if Massa played, which of course he is.
According to that hopeless shill Dave Starman, if you are not in the nacho you are losing. sigh. Is objectivity too much to ask for?
Though in his defense he said uno would only win if Massa played, which of course he is.
OK I give up.
I believe the AHC's OOC record this year was dismal.
Im a bit surprised that so many are overlooking UNO.
It isn't support, it is the cost of the bus. Way out of line! I can get a hotel, gas and tickets for half the expense.