manurespreader
Still upright
We had our chance at the end there but missed on the breakaway. The face-off stats could have been better also. Blake was fantastic!
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
<> Michigan Tech Huskies 2021-22: STILL Our 100th Anniversary <>
- Thread starter DrunkTrainPolka
- Start date
Have we even gotten a shot on goal in OT this year? Had a chance to possess the puck right off the draw and meekly swatted it to Mankato. You cannot win games when you're terrified of contact. It's like boys against men when we are 3-on-3. It really highlights our refusal (or inability) to recruit competent skilled skaters.
Yes, but I'm not blaming officiating for this one. If they're letting that stuff go then adapt. I also thought there were some interference calls that could've gone against us in the middle stages. We lost because we can't score and we can't skate 3-on-3. At all.
Last edited:
Joe mentioned it post game... We have good players, but we are not playing well (enough) as a team. yet. Lots of good individual effort, but MSU really impresses the way the play together as a team.
But overall, we had the shot to win with 10 sec left. Maybe we didn’t deserve to be there at the end of the game, but if they let you hang around you gotta bury that one.
oh yeah. faceoffs. faceoffs. faceoffs.
But overall, we had the shot to win with 10 sec left. Maybe we didn’t deserve to be there at the end of the game, but if they let you hang around you gotta bury that one.
oh yeah. faceoffs. faceoffs. faceoffs.
manurespreader
Still upright
in the great scheme of things OT doesn't count for much. and yes we can skate, that's not the issue.
Ok, I'll bite. What's the issue then? Why are we so ineffective in 3-on-3 situations?
I agree in terms of Pairwise OT isn't a huge deal, but that's a lot of conference points we are leaving on the table. For a guy who has never played a conference playoff series at home, you would think Joe would focus on this.
JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
At a 10,000 ft level, I feel like Mankato (and other top teams) are coached to win games. Tech is being coached to not make mistakes and not lose. There is a big difference. Coaching to win means taking risks and going for it. Coaching not to lose results in plays like the OT faceoff. Tech wins the draw but then decides to just give up the puck to the Mavs at the first bit of pressure (aka, make the "safe" play). If you want to win you WANT the puck on your stick. Tech never touched the puck again after that give away, game over.
Exactly. With a really hot goalie you may get an occasional 1-0 or 2-1 win against a team like MSU. But you will never win an OT with that style of play.
I thought we played better Saturday. A few thoughts:
1. We lost way to many faceoffs. Many were draws that we lost in the following scrum. It kills the PK and PP, and your always chasing the puck for the first 15 seconds of each shift.
2. We did well on the boards. Especially the forecheck. Good energy to pressure MSU and prevent easy exits.
3. The difference in the game was the play in front of the net. MSU got the puck in front of the net and created a lot more quality scoring opportunities. We need to find a way to connect passes to the front.
1. We lost way to many faceoffs. Many were draws that we lost in the following scrum. It kills the PK and PP, and your always chasing the puck for the first 15 seconds of each shift.
2. We did well on the boards. Especially the forecheck. Good energy to pressure MSU and prevent easy exits.
3. The difference in the game was the play in front of the net. MSU got the puck in front of the net and created a lot more quality scoring opportunities. We need to find a way to connect passes to the front.
Joe said on his show today that we have a goalie committed for next season. His identity does not seem to be public knowledge, but I have some guesses:
1. Max Gutjahr (Amarillo, NAHL) – from Appleton, Wis.; NAHL goaltender of the month for November; teammate of Oliver Bezick
2. Alex Tracy (Sioux City, USHL) – best uncommitted 20-year-old USHL goaltender; from Chicago
3. Sam Evola (Johnstown, NAHL) – from Rochester, Mich.; 12th best sv.% in NAHL (10+ GP)
4. Lassi Lehti (El Paso, NAHL) – 8th best sv% in NAHL (10+ GP); Houghton may be a welcome change after El Paso for an Espoo native
1. Max Gutjahr (Amarillo, NAHL) – from Appleton, Wis.; NAHL goaltender of the month for November; teammate of Oliver Bezick
2. Alex Tracy (Sioux City, USHL) – best uncommitted 20-year-old USHL goaltender; from Chicago
3. Sam Evola (Johnstown, NAHL) – from Rochester, Mich.; 12th best sv.% in NAHL (10+ GP)
4. Lassi Lehti (El Paso, NAHL) – 8th best sv% in NAHL (10+ GP); Houghton may be a welcome change after El Paso for an Espoo native
manurespreader
Still upright
Joe said on his show that he wasn't against all pick plays, only the moving ones. I disagree with that. I think it's dangerous and should be more tightly enforced. Too easy, imho, for kids to get hurt and it disrupts the flow of the game if you ask me. Plus it allows a team that is having trouble in zone entry for instance to get zone entry via the pick. Wisconsin uses it on the pp so that the point man can wipe off a defender and get a free look at the net.
Lost_Husky
Late to the Party
How is it dangerous? Their teammates need to call out the pic if they see it being set up. They could set up a 2 second "set" rule where the person setting the pick can't move and has to be "flat footed." I don't know about hockey, but in basketball, injuries rarely happened off the pick. If they let knees, elbows and guys move, then yes, it will cause injuries. That is up to officiating to stop/control.
Well, Alex Tracy is off the board - he just committed to Mankato.
I realize this started out as an educated guess... I am hoping they are looking globally. Thanks for the updates.
manurespreader
Still upright
I don't think teammates are very good at calling it out and I don't think refs are very good at discerning whether it is moving or not. I'd like to see them called more.
BTW. We could use AIC to beat Uconn tonight.
John J. MacInnes
Coach Emeritus
So if you were hoping to see the Band at the 'GLI' this year, the Big Ten says you can pound sand.
https://techhockeyguide.com/2021/12...wed-to-play-at-munn-or-yost-for-gli-showcase/
https://techhockeyguide.com/2021/12...wed-to-play-at-munn-or-yost-for-gli-showcase/
Lost_Husky
Late to the Party
This is BS! I could begrudgingly go with playing "The GLI" in EL and AA with the scheduling challenges at the Pizza Box, but this is too far. This is the first time in a very long time I question our scheduling powers that be. No band + playing MSU in EL + playing U of M in AA = two road games. It was a stretch to call it the GLI before, and now there is no way anyone should call it that. The real kicker, we wasted a scheduling bullet for this.
This is like Christmas without presents.
FadeToBlack&Gold
8647
These have been road games from the day the "showcase" format was announced, so you could see this coming a mile away.
The GLI is done. I hope our athletic dept can see that. Schedule a couple of meaningful NC games. Or create a new tournament with non-B1G schools. Could still be downstate. Plenty of great opportunities.
manurespreader
Still upright
I don't think it is.( dead) the problem though is LCA charges so much to use the arena that it's hard to even break even and they give us the dregs of what dates there might be. I think they will try again though. Let's hope it works.
I appreciate Michigan and MSU being willing to play at home on short notice but maybe we could just show up anyway instruments and all.. There won't be students after all, so plenty of seats. .
I don't think Van Andel is a viable alternative to be honest and all the other possible arenas aren't acceptable.