Shirtless Guy
Old Dirty Basterd
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Its been that way all season.
Its been that way all season.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
- Thread starter Wi.Huskies Fan
- Start date
oldish husky
New member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
You have to cut them some slack. When you write a comprehensive 9 sentence article, things are bound to slip past the editor.
You have to cut them some slack. When you write a comprehensive 9 sentence article, things are bound to slip past the editor.
John J. MacInnes
Coach Emeritus
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
To further support that - only one team has seen more points credited to defensemen (if you don't count Leibinger as one anymore).
Total points scored by D
111 - Quinnipiac (6 players in double figures)
106 - Michigan Tech (5 in double figures)
102 - Penn State (5)
99 - Providence (5)
94 - RIT (5)
If you want to include Leibinger, his 14 points make the MTU total 120, far and away the most of any team.
To further support that - only one team has seen more points credited to defensemen (if you don't count Leibinger as one anymore).
Total points scored by D
111 - Quinnipiac (6 players in double figures)
106 - Michigan Tech (5 in double figures)
102 - Penn State (5)
99 - Providence (5)
94 - RIT (5)
If you want to include Leibinger, his 14 points make the MTU total 120, far and away the most of any team.
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
I'd almost rather they didn't publish an article rather than what they're currently doing.
I expect this series to be the WCHA representative in the tourney. I, personally think these are the two best teams and are playing as good or better than anyone else.
I'd almost rather they didn't publish an article rather than what they're currently doing.
I expect this series to be the WCHA representative in the tourney. I, personally think these are the two best teams and are playing as good or better than anyone else.
Shirtless Guy
Old Dirty Basterd
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Did you like my CHN WCHA Quaterfinals preview? I'm starting to not really enjoy writing those because Wodon wants them so dry, I don't get to interject much and it just gets boring doing the same research on all those players for all those teams.
http://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2017/03/02_wcha_first_round_preview.php
Did you like my CHN WCHA Quaterfinals preview? I'm starting to not really enjoy writing those because Wodon wants them so dry, I don't get to interject much and it just gets boring doing the same research on all those players for all those teams.
http://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2017/03/02_wcha_first_round_preview.php
Last edited:
I can understand that. It's pretty much just informational without anything more. Maybe it's just what I prefer, but I prefer to read some opinion to just stats. The local papers generally do a good job at that and it's a lot of repeating. Granted, I understand spoonfeeding readers too. Just my preference.
manurespreader
Still upright
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Honestly I think it's a good thing for D men to get involved. The game has changed over the years and this just means to me that coaches are evolving to meet the new realities. I think Tech would have had several more wins with the occasional mind fart.
Honestly I think it's a good thing for D men to get involved. The game has changed over the years and this just means to me that coaches are evolving to meet the new realities. I think Tech would have had several more wins with the occasional mind fart.
Huskiefan906
Well-known member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Is anyone else excited with Mankato coming to town. I think this will be a classic. Is Mankato as formidable as the past couple seasons?
I think Tech clearly raised their game and will need to continue its high pace attack against the Mavericks.
Who do you think is the key for Tech. I think Jackson, Heinonen, Lucchini, and L'Esperance are the keys this weekend. All of the D will be allowing the forwards to get it going.
Is anyone else excited with Mankato coming to town. I think this will be a classic. Is Mankato as formidable as the past couple seasons?
I think Tech clearly raised their game and will need to continue its high pace attack against the Mavericks.
Who do you think is the key for Tech. I think Jackson, Heinonen, Lucchini, and L'Esperance are the keys this weekend. All of the D will be allowing the forwards to get it going.
Last edited:
rustedblades
New member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Was there a MP Show this week? Haven't seen anything online yet.
I think everyone contributing is the strength of this team and the key going forward.
I've asked for a shorter bench on occasion this season but I really think the staff has done the right thing playing the young guys like they have. It should pay big dividends over the next 7 or 8 games!
Was there a MP Show this week? Haven't seen anything online yet.
I think everyone contributing is the strength of this team and the key going forward.
I've asked for a shorter bench on occasion this season but I really think the staff has done the right thing playing the young guys like they have. It should pay big dividends over the next 7 or 8 games!
giwan
Really??!!
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
KEY BEEF, no soft goals, needs to up his game to where is was a few weeks ago.
KEY BEEF, no soft goals, needs to up his game to where is was a few weeks ago.
rustedblades
New member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
I know I am putting a lot of carts ahead of my horse but I love the match ups projected for the Midwest Regional in Cincinnati.
http://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2017/03/05_ncaa_bracket_abcs;_early_march.php
UMD, Western, Notre Dame and WCHA Champ. All teams Tech has played and has shown they can compete against.
Here's hoping! Go Huskies!
I know I am putting a lot of carts ahead of my horse but I love the match ups projected for the Midwest Regional in Cincinnati.
http://www.collegehockeynews.com/news/2017/03/05_ncaa_bracket_abcs;_early_march.php
UMD, Western, Notre Dame and WCHA Champ. All teams Tech has played and has shown they can compete against.
Here's hoping! Go Huskies!
oldish husky
New member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
I think this would require the WCHA champ to be a 15th seed. If Denver or UMD get the top seed, wouldn't they stay out west, meaning the 16th seed also goes out west?
I think this would require the WCHA champ to be a 15th seed. If Denver or UMD get the top seed, wouldn't they stay out west, meaning the 16th seed also goes out west?
oldish husky
New member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
Ahh, North Dakota has to go to Fargo if they are in. I'm going to shut up now and wait a week to see the final brackets.
Ahh, North Dakota has to go to Fargo if they are in. I'm going to shut up now and wait a week to see the final brackets.
JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
This web site predicted a West region bracket of the WCHA Champs plus UND, Minnesota and Denver played in Fargo, ND. Ugh. Not great match-ups and certainly not "neutral site" by any definition of the word.
Ryan J
This web site predicted a West region bracket of the WCHA Champs plus UND, Minnesota and Denver played in Fargo, ND. Ugh. Not great match-ups and certainly not "neutral site" by any definition of the word.
Ryan J
beaverhockeyfan
Well-known member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
And good luck getting tickets. From what I have heard, the only ones left are those set aside for the schools....
I believe CollegeHockeyNews had the WCHA champ in Cincy, but that was with the assumption the the AHA champ would be ranked below the WCHA champ.
And good luck getting tickets. From what I have heard, the only ones left are those set aside for the schools....
I believe CollegeHockeyNews had the WCHA champ in Cincy, but that was with the assumption the the AHA champ would be ranked below the WCHA champ.
manurespreader
Still upright
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
For the WCHA rep to get to Cincy it requires only 1 team from Atlantic hockey in and even then the WCHA team would have to finish higher in the pairwise, which I can't make happen, unless UND doesn't make it in and even then it's 50 -50. I think it's pretty likely that whoever the WCHA team is, they play Denver in the first game.
purpleinnebraska
Well-known member
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
It's been a strange season. All teams are inconsistent, to some extent, but we've been remarkably consistent in our inconsistency. Pretty much every weekend featured a really good game and...another game. Goaltending was mediocre most of the year, although Pawloski was very good last weekend. Our top line has been very good, but we're not as deep in the forward corps as we've been in the previous 4 years.
In other words, we're good enough to have finished 3rd, but vulnerable enough that we lost to 7 different conference opponents. We haven't won in Houghton in a couple years now, so we're rightfully the underdogs, but I wouldn't count us out.
If that didn't help at all, it's because I have no idea how we might perform this weekend.
It's been a strange season. All teams are inconsistent, to some extent, but we've been remarkably consistent in our inconsistency. Pretty much every weekend featured a really good game and...another game. Goaltending was mediocre most of the year, although Pawloski was very good last weekend. Our top line has been very good, but we're not as deep in the forward corps as we've been in the previous 4 years.
In other words, we're good enough to have finished 3rd, but vulnerable enough that we lost to 7 different conference opponents. We haven't won in Houghton in a couple years now, so we're rightfully the underdogs, but I wouldn't count us out.
If that didn't help at all, it's because I have no idea how we might perform this weekend.
John J. MacInnes
Coach Emeritus
Re: MICHIGAN TECH HUSKIES...2016-17 season. 96th season of hockey (continued, part 2)
If North Dakota is in the #4 seed band, the tournament committee is pretty dead set against making the top seeded team in the tournament play against a host school in their opening game. That would push the #1 overall to Cincinnati.
If North Dakota is in the #4 seed band, the tournament committee is pretty dead set against making the top seeded team in the tournament play against a host school in their opening game. That would push the #1 overall to Cincinnati.