Re: Michigan Tech 2015 off-season I: Building on what we've learned...
I'm sure part of it is that MTU is looking at the face that all their suites are leased and wondering how much more demand there is for suites...maybe they end up adding more to the west end instead of the previously discussed club area. I really hope they don't do more suites on the east end because I feel like that will just push the band to an even worse place.
I'm in favor of reducing standing room and adding permanent seats instead. I think standing room should be limited to about 500. I'm in favor of more suites, I'd like to see a MUCH nicer food area added to the east end.That would add a lot to my experience as a fan. The bathrooms are too crowded as well, which I don't mind but my girl friend hates.. I'd like to see the number of seats go up by about 800.Even if it was only totally full for 6 or 8 games per year, it would be worth doing. Carnival for 2, NMU for 2, 2 for the top WCHA team, and one of MSU/Mich/ Minny/ wisco. All would fill it.
I'd like to see some more ancillary facilities added too.
So overall I'm all in on expanding the east end and I'm also in favor of more suites, though not to the extent that the band is pushed out. I disagree that we have come anywhere close to maximizing demand. I believe there is a fund that has been started to do more work on the arena, but you'd have to ask the powers that be for sure.
Second, Joe Bertagne, the commish of HE had something to say about the officiating at our game vs St Cloud. He contended that the offsides call that was reviewed and saved us a goal, should not have been reviewed, that the intent of the rule was not to call back plays like that which were so close. He wants the officials to allow those kinds of plays and not review them.
I'm wondering how you could have the rule and not expect that somewhere, the line has to be actually drawn and that the linesman's judgement is not always good enough, especially on plays that result in a goal.. The linesmen missed a lot in that game as it was. And the refs totally muffed the Petan penalty call. (Though I have to say, I thought Phillips should have had that shot and I think it cost him in the Richter voting.) Overall, HE officiating stinks.
Third, USCHO had a writer from SI come on and say how he thought there ought to be super regionals at campus sites, how he hated the way they were now due to the lack of atmosphere, and play 2 out of 3 games there, blah de blah, de blah. Apparently he has not researched this very closely, because right before him, an ESPN guy came on and said if they move to campus sites, espn would not broadcast them, except on espn3. Then the same writer from SI says he wants the game to grow and be accessible. Say what? But he's an eastern writer, so he must be an expert.
Another thing that happened which I find disquieting, is that a different eastern writer could not name a single player on UND's team, other than the goalie. So they know hockey, and write about hockey, but really they only know eastern hockey, and not only that, even at the frozen 4 they don't take time to do the homework they should do before the event.
I used to think these guys knew so much and I hung on every word. Now I think, where did they get THIS idiot.