My take-aways from the weekend:
I think BC was the more talented / quicker team however Tech got key chances (penalty shot, lots of power plays, etc) and Tech made BC pay by cashing in multiple goals as a result.
ASU plays a "heavy game" and they brought it both nights. I think there was more body contact in the first 10 minutes of the ASU-NMU game than the entire MTU-BC game.
ASU has some skill guys and the best puck handling goalie I've seen in the college in many years. He's certainly a third D-man on the ice.
ASU's #39 on defense was very quick. On multiple occasions Tech got caught making sloppy passes across the offensive blue line and ASU picked their pocket and were off to the races.
Tech just dug too deep of a hole on Saturday night and just couldn't catch up. ASU buried their chances and Tech didn't on Saturday night.
I watched both games from between the benches so I heard plenty of what the coaches were saying to the players. In general Joe keeps it pretty positive and tells the guys what he wants to see, rather than telling them what's not going right or what they are not doing. Saturday especially when ASU was bringing the body early on, he kept calling for Tech to match their effort and battle harder. Overall I think Tech just lacks the poise they have had in some past seasons. Watching BC break out of the zone, there is a solid structure to what they do and most passing is crisp, tape-to-tape. Tech seems to want to skate the puck up the ice rather than 2 or 3 short passes while the other guys get their legs moving and get up the ice.
Prior to the weekend I would have picked BC over Tech, NMU over ASU with BC beating NMU and Tech beating ASU on Saturday. I guess that is why they play the games. I'm sure BC didn't look at the tourney in the preseason expecting to come home with two losses (well one loss and one NCAA tie).
As for the tourney operation, overall the rink staff really wasn't ready for college hockey. Everything from not having the nets set in place before Tech came out to warm up Friday night down to not even knowing which team was which. (Penalty called on Tech, announcer reads the name of the BC player with the same number.) Not sure how things run for the Knights games, but I find it hard to believe there would be a 3-4 minute delay between a penalty/goal occurring and when they announced it. In a couple cases, the penalty ENDED before they announced it to the crowd.
T-Mobile is a nice rink (as you would hope all new rinks would be) but is greatly oversized for what the tourney requires. Seating for around 6k would have been plenty. I agree that Tech was well represented in the stands for both games. Hopefully other tourney organizers get the word that Tech travels well and we'll keep getting invites to these sorts of events. Pointless to invite BC. Their fans don't show up anywhere. Even NMU was far more visible in the stands and around town compared to BC.
Ryan