For sure.
The one thing that was interesting is how UMD figured out whatever we were doing on D in the first period. Which was actually pretty unique, I thought- we kind of played a pretty conservative D which clogged up the neutral zone really badly. I noticed something different when we lost a faceoff early in the game, and all but one forward quickly escaped into the neutral zone.
And that worked really well, as it just interrupted UMD's flow really really badly- even when they could get into the zone, it was just start/stop/start/stop and they had no momentum going in.
But at the same time, we were really aggressive as evidenced on the PP that scored the 2nd goal- really risky move for both D men to stay on the blue line when the puck was so high. Some really good play up there to catch UMD out of position with a very open player and a good pass.
Still, that interruptive play got lost in the 3rd, especially on the PK where they scored twice. (yea, I know the first goal was even strength, but it was in that area where the penalized player doesn't have enough time to effect the play). Both times, UMD just swept into the zone and got around the D. I'm going to give credit to UMD to figure out how to get through it.
It will be interesting to face Denver's very hot goalie.