Mercyhurst has had a ton of turnover the last couple of seasons, so the edge in experience goes to RIT. My guess is that the Lakers are a work in progress at this point. I certainly don't expect anything like the many-to-nothing scores that were common in early Lindenwood games last year.
Mercyhurst has had a ton of turnover the last couple of seasons, so the edge in experience goes to RIT. My guess is that the Lakers are a work in progress at this point. I certainly don't expect anything like the many-to-nothing scores that were common in early Lindenwood games last year.
What did I say that was incorrect? Have the Lakers not had a lot of turnover the last couple seasons? Do they not have more young players than RIT? I'd say any young team is a work in progress in week one (yes, including my team.) Was the score 14-0, 13-0, 11-0? No? I stand by what I posted. As for a team bond, September is pretty early to tell.hmmmm maybe jumped to conclusion to quickly???...MU has a full roster of very strong players and a team bond stronger than ever
What did I say that was incorrect? Have the Lakers not had a lot of turnover the last couple seasons? Do they not have more young players than RIT? I'd say any young team is a work in progress in week one (yes, including my team.) Was the score 14-0, 13-0, 11-0? No? I stand by what I posted. As for a team bond, September is pretty early to tell.
What was the final score of this game?
Who was goalie for MU?
yaaaaaah...maybe you are right...game one just a fluke..wouldn't be because MU has a solid team...game two should prove that...oh wait...how many 5-3 man advantages for RIT??? shots?? final score????
http://www.ritathletics.com/custompages/whock/2012-13/092912.htm#GAME.NCA
SO close!! if it were horse shoes or tiddly winks![]()