What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Jim Fetter

Re: Jim Fetter

Kinda surprised he didn't end up with the Brown job, if not one of the earlier HC openings. But good for St. Cloud.

Apparently Brown has a very stringent requirement that candidates have Ivy League recruiting experience.
 
Re: Jim Fetter

Apparently Brown has a very stringent requirement that candidates have Ivy League recruiting experience.

Why do you insist on making statements that are incorrect and trying to pass the off as "facts"? You have a role associated with an organization in women's hockey. You should not be putting out incorrect information as "fact" when it is not!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hux
Re: Jim Fetter

Why do you insist on making statements that are incorrect and trying to pass the off as "facts"? You have a role associated with an organization in women's hockey. You should not be putting out incorrect information as "fact" when it is not!

I don't know if what Hux said is fact or not, but you didnt provide any more proof that what he said isn't fact than he did that it is....so please explain to us why we should believe you and not him? At this point both of your posts provide no substance to verify the opinion behind them, but I'd love to have some real facts one way or the other...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hux
Re: Jim Fetter

Apparently Brown has a very stringent requirement that candidates have Ivy League recruiting experience.
Why do you insist on making statements that are incorrect and trying to pass the off as "facts"? You have a role associated with an organization in women's hockey. You should not be putting out incorrect information as "fact" when it is not!

In defense of HUX here, pointing out he starts his comment with "Apparently", and secondly given the institution in question, it is a reasonable expectation/qualification requirement even if it is not stated per se in the actual add for the position.
 
Re: Jim Fetter

Maybe we could start by defining exactly what Ivy League recruiting experience is. Why is it any different than any other recruiting experience? If I look at the recent records of the vast majority of the Ivy's I guess one might question if any of them, save Cornell have a corner on any type of superior recruiting technique....
 
Last edited:
Re: Jim Fetter

Maybe we could start by defining exactly what Ivy League recruiting experience is. Why is it any different than any other recruiting experience? If I look at the recent records of the vast majority of the Ivy's I guess one might question if any of them, save Cornell have a corner on any type of superior recruiting technique....

the admissions process is extremely different....i dont know exactly how all the details work out, but basically if you have a borderline ivy academic player that you want to get in, the players applications that you submit to admissions as a group have to reach certain benchmarks for that player to have a chance.
 
Apparently Brown has a very stringent requirement that candidates have Ivy League recruiting experience.

I was curious about this statement and randomly looked at the head coach bios of four Brown teams and none of them had ivy experience prior to Brown.
 
Re: Jim Fetter

Is it possible the comment was regarding an informal, unwritten yet desired criteria or qualification the AD looks for in a prospective coaching candidate at Brown? Just asking. It seems plausible to me there could be some hurdles Ivy coaches may have to navigate that staffs of non Ivy programs aren't faced with.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hux
Re: Jim Fetter

Maybe we could start by defining exactly what Ivy League recruiting experience is. Why is it any different than any other recruiting experience? If I look at the recent records of the vast majority of the Ivy's I guess one might question if any of them, save Cornell have a corner on any type of superior recruiting technique....

Would have thought that it is fairly common knowledge that the process and rules and regulations for admission into an Ivy are quite a bit different than those for a scholly school. There are no scholaships, high admission standards and a rigorous admission process. Not a lot of athletes can walk straight into an Ivy through the front door without the support of the coach.
 
Last edited:
Re: Jim Fetter

Would have thought that it is farily common knowledge that the admission's process and rules and regulations for Ivy are quite a bit different that those for a scholly school. There are no scholaships, high admission standards and a rigorous admission process. Not a lot of athletes can walk straight into an Ivy through the front door without the support of the coach.

Suppose. But in getting back to the original post....when I think of recruiting, I think of hockey talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hux
Back
Top