I'll go first Minnesota play 4 lines consistant and wear teams down for pete's sake. You should be #1 in the country.
Right on. More bench time for the 40 to 50 point kids and more ice time for the 1 to 5 point kids.
They've usually had a full four lines, though seldom what they perceive to be their top 12 forwards. Were Downey available, maybe they would play four lines a bit more. But this weekend, it seemed like they always wanted to be subbing their "extra" wings off the fourth line for the same person. Depth only really helps if everyone is getting a break.But in fairness, for quite a few games this year the Gophers haven't had 4 lines worth of healthy forwards.
I hope AggiesHockey doesn't mind my moving this from the "Cellar Dwellers" thread to this thread. Wanted to comment yesterday to say I'm probably a little less optimistic when it comes to whether the Huskies have begun a turnaround at this point. One of the more pressing needs for SCSU is for forwards who can score...and score consistently, IMO. Friend is a solid starting point for Goose and staff. Hanmer is a fine blueliner and SCSU has a couple / few who can put the puck in the net but overall there's a fairly evident shortage of support for them in the offense mode. Stronger recruiting, getting back to something much closer to the kind of success the program has had in the past (in state) and elsewhere will be pretty key / vital. Especially if you look at the recruiting classes of the U, UW, UMD and UND lately. No easy task to remain competitive or become competitive under those circumstances. The SCSU staff seems to have possibly been bitten by some recent recruiting results that didn't pan out, with some complaints of less than astute assessment of talent from the gallery. I don't know about that...could be they're recruiting the right talent and merely not succeeding often enough. The "poaching" of Minnesota kids by highly regarded universities elsewhere has had an affect on St. Cloud IMO. There's some disagreement on that though. Recruiting competition has intensified but the staff has to combat that. That's the job.I'll be a bit more specific...
SCSU was 1-31-1 last year. Right now, 5-19-2, already a vast improvement over last year. Recruited a strong goalie (Friend). Seems like they're turning the corner.
I think many non-coaches or casual fans fail to understand the use of four lines during the course of a hockey game. Each line has a purpose and a role. Through the course of any given hockey game things happen that can dictate who plays when and what the line's job or purpose is for that shift, period, game.
Anyone care to explain the purpse and role of lines 1 through 4?
I hope AggiesHockey doesn't mind my moving this from the "Cellar Dwellers" thread to this thread. Wanted to comment yesterday to say I'm probably a little less optimistic when it comes to whether the Huskies have begun a turnaround at this point. One of the more pressing needs for SCSU is for forwards who can score...and score consistently, IMO. Friend is a solid starting point for Goose and staff. Hanmer is a fine blueliner and SCSU has a couple / few who can put the puck in the net but overall there's a fairly evident shortage of support for them in the offense mode. Stronger recruiting, getting back to something much closer to the kind of success the program has had in the past (in state) and elsewhere will be pretty key / vital. Especially if you look at the recruiting classes of the U, UW, UMD and UND lately. No easy task to remain competitive or become competitive under those circumstances. The SCSU staff seems to have possibly been bitten by some recent recruiting results that didn't pan out, with some complaints of less than astute assessment of talent from the gallery. I don't know about that...could be they're recruiting the right talent and merely not succeeding often enough. The "poaching" of Minnesota kids by highly regarded universities elsewhere has had an affect on St. Cloud IMO. There's some disagreement on that though. Recruiting competition has intensified but the staff has to combat that. That's the job.
So...stronger recruiting.
Not at all...I hope AggiesHockey doesn't mind my moving this from the "Cellar Dwellers" thread to this thread.
I don't believe those players would have that point of view. In return for scholarship $$ I would think no one would / should feel used. The poaching comment isn't really that interesting if it's intended meaning had been more clear. Intended only to mean scouting and recruiting in a geographic region well outside of or away from their own location. Not intended to imply any negative per "poaching" formal definition.Not at all...
Interesting comment on "poaching." I wonder if the MN talent that landed at Providence or Harvard feels like they got used, or poached.
... Not intended to imply any negative per "poaching" formal definition.![]()