Re: HockeyTown? Ya gotta be kidding me
Minnesota, the State of Hockey? You couldn't even keep the North Stars! What gives? Pass the torch!
Seriously...the differences between Michigan and Minnesota hockey culture have been discussed before. Minnesota had no NHL team until 1967, and a poorly run one from 1967-1993, so the high school and college games became king. Here, we've had the Wings since 1926, and could follow the NHL on Canadian TV long before American networks would touch it, so the NHL is the focus of attention. While college hockey is big on campus, and gets more attention in the Detroit than it used to (particularly in the Freep), the general public doesn't have more than a passing interest. I'm not questioning Minnesota's passion for the game just because you managed to lose an NHL team. Don't question ours just because the college game is much lower key here.
On the bright side, the argument for hockey supremacy bodes well for the future of the Michigan-Minnesota rivalry in the Big Ten...I've read that it was a big deal in the old-time WCHA, and I bet that it will become what Michigan-Ohio State is to Big Ten football.
You could shoot a cannon thru Joe Louis at tonight's final. What gives? Last night at a suburban sports bar in Detroit not ONE of the 50 flat screens had any hockey. Meanwhile with no Minnesota teams at the WCHA Final in ST. Paul there are 20,000 packed into the Xcel to watch Denver vs. Nodak. Hey Detroit ... Pass the torch!
Minnesota, the State of Hockey? You couldn't even keep the North Stars! What gives? Pass the torch!
Seriously...the differences between Michigan and Minnesota hockey culture have been discussed before. Minnesota had no NHL team until 1967, and a poorly run one from 1967-1993, so the high school and college games became king. Here, we've had the Wings since 1926, and could follow the NHL on Canadian TV long before American networks would touch it, so the NHL is the focus of attention. While college hockey is big on campus, and gets more attention in the Detroit than it used to (particularly in the Freep), the general public doesn't have more than a passing interest. I'm not questioning Minnesota's passion for the game just because you managed to lose an NHL team. Don't question ours just because the college game is much lower key here.
On the bright side, the argument for hockey supremacy bodes well for the future of the Michigan-Minnesota rivalry in the Big Ten...I've read that it was a big deal in the old-time WCHA, and I bet that it will become what Michigan-Ohio State is to Big Ten football.