SkinsFan09
New member
Any observations, comments, questions, concerns, disses or compliments and discussion about the new 11-team Hockey East conference...
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
- Thread starter SkinsFan09
- Start date
jcarter7669
Registered User
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
I hate BC... and Lowell. Unfortunately only one is making me happy so far this season.
I hate BC... and Lowell. Unfortunately only one is making me happy so far this season.
ericredaxe
Veteran
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
It's really lame that everyone makes the playoffs and Notre Dame does not feel like a Hockey East team to me.
It's really lame that everyone makes the playoffs and Notre Dame does not feel like a Hockey East team to me.
Last edited:
FiveHole12
Registered User
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
I remember after a game my freshman year (fall of '91) I wrote on the old hockey-L about the goons at Providence after they roughed up Pellerin and company. About 30 minutes after I posted it, my phone rang and Coach Walsh wanted to see me. That afternoon before practice he read me the riot act about having respect for our opponents, giving them locker room material etc. Then as we were walking out of his office he grinned and said, "But you weren't wrong."
That was 22 years ago and they're still a bunch of goons.
Didn't you mean to say Mildcats, or Skating Mother Theresa's? Brom and Ylae could kick their azz.
Freddy Meyer is a hack... and the Friars ARE a bunch of dirty goons. Some things never change.
I remember after a game my freshman year (fall of '91) I wrote on the old hockey-L about the goons at Providence after they roughed up Pellerin and company. About 30 minutes after I posted it, my phone rang and Coach Walsh wanted to see me. That afternoon before practice he read me the riot act about having respect for our opponents, giving them locker room material etc. Then as we were walking out of his office he grinned and said, "But you weren't wrong."
That was 22 years ago and they're still a bunch of goons.
I remember after a game my freshman year (fall of '91) I wrote on the old hockey-L about the goons at Providence after they roughed up Pellerin and company. About 30 minutes after I posted it, my phone rang and Coach Walsh wanted to see me. That afternoon before practice he read me the riot act about having respect for our opponents, giving them locker room material etc. Then as we were walking out of his office he grinned and said, "But you weren't wrong."
That was 22 years ago and they're still a bunch of goons.
yes but now Providence's physicality has a strong Walsh style to it via one of his disciples Nate Leaman
Coach Nutty is the Providence women's coach Bob Deraney, who has a slight Jackie Parker bent to his personality.....desevrings was how one Crazed UNH fan described how the Lady Goons would get theirs from UNH in the championship games in the first years of WHEA
jcarter7669
Registered User
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
Serious question....really...
When does a penalty become a game DQ instead of a game misconduct. It is my understanding that a Game DQ are for "intent to injure" AND/OR fighting. And I thought fighting was a given. Take more then a swipe or two and it's good bye...
This was a video from Friday's Notre Dame game posted on their season thread....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...type=2&theater
Shouldn't Summerhays have gotten a DQ? If this were a HE game would it have made a difference?
Serious question....really...
When does a penalty become a game DQ instead of a game misconduct. It is my understanding that a Game DQ are for "intent to injure" AND/OR fighting. And I thought fighting was a given. Take more then a swipe or two and it's good bye...
This was a video from Friday's Notre Dame game posted on their season thread....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...type=2&theater
Shouldn't Summerhays have gotten a DQ? If this were a HE game would it have made a difference?
WrathOfAramark
Servin the best Lowell has to offer
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
First real weekend of league action is coming up. Anyone excited?
First real weekend of league action is coming up. Anyone excited?
puckdropper
Registered User
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
More often than not, a major penalty has a game misconduct or Game DQ that must be called in conjunction with the foul (CFB into boards or net....CTH....Kneeing....spearing... etc...) Usually the infraction will result in a game misconduct, which is the balance of the game. The DQ (removal of the player for the balance of the game + the next game) would be called when the foul is particularly egregious, an injury resulted, or the offending player was deliberately attempting to injure his opponent. Fouls such as fighting or kicking an opponent, or physically abusing the official(s) are automatic DQ's.
Serious question....really...
When does a penalty become a game DQ instead of a game misconduct. It is my understanding that a Game DQ are for "intent to injure" AND/OR fighting. And I thought fighting was a given. Take more then a swipe or two and it's good bye...
This was a video from Friday's Notre Dame game posted on their season thread....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...type=2&theater
Shouldn't Summerhays have gotten a DQ? If this were a HE game would it have made a difference?[/QUOTE]
More often than not, a major penalty has a game misconduct or Game DQ that must be called in conjunction with the foul (CFB into boards or net....CTH....Kneeing....spearing... etc...) Usually the infraction will result in a game misconduct, which is the balance of the game. The DQ (removal of the player for the balance of the game + the next game) would be called when the foul is particularly egregious, an injury resulted, or the offending player was deliberately attempting to injure his opponent. Fouls such as fighting or kicking an opponent, or physically abusing the official(s) are automatic DQ's.
Serious question....really...
When does a penalty become a game DQ instead of a game misconduct. It is my understanding that a Game DQ are for "intent to injure" AND/OR fighting. And I thought fighting was a given. Take more then a swipe or two and it's good bye...
This was a video from Friday's Notre Dame game posted on their season thread....
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v...type=2&theater
Shouldn't Summerhays have gotten a DQ? If this were a HE game would it have made a difference?[/QUOTE]
Nick Papagiorgio
Holding court
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
Face mask penalties may be minor, major (without a game misconduct), or DQ. The specific penalty that was called is not necessarily a DQ, it depends on how serious the officials judged the offense to be. The rulebook is actually fairly specific about where the division is between each level of offense, so there shouldn't be that much grey area.
To the best of my knowledge (without finding a specific citation), the penalties in the books are always minimums with the option to escalate if events warrant. Consequently, I would assume that the refs judged Summerhays's offense to fall in between the simple major penalty level and the DQ level, so they punished it with a major plus a game misconduct.
But I haven't seen a replay of it to judge whether I think that the non-DQ decision was correct or not.
Face mask penalties may be minor, major (without a game misconduct), or DQ. The specific penalty that was called is not necessarily a DQ, it depends on how serious the officials judged the offense to be. The rulebook is actually fairly specific about where the division is between each level of offense, so there shouldn't be that much grey area.
To the best of my knowledge (without finding a specific citation), the penalties in the books are always minimums with the option to escalate if events warrant. Consequently, I would assume that the refs judged Summerhays's offense to fall in between the simple major penalty level and the DQ level, so they punished it with a major plus a game misconduct.
But I haven't seen a replay of it to judge whether I think that the non-DQ decision was correct or not.
jcarter7669
Registered User
SkinsFan09
New member
Re: Hockey East 2013-14 Thread
Can't wait for the PC/BC matchup.
Can't wait for the PC/BC matchup.
