What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

What's great is that this is still such a young team and a culture of winning will become contagious - that is what is most impressive. These guys have not won consistently in several years, really since 3 years ago when they had a .500 record with all of those ties. Harvard has 3 SRs on this team that play meaningful minutes (Everson, McNally, and Michalek) so we should all be very bullish about the near-term future for this team and program.

I'd be even more bullish if we can snag some recruits from other schools. Turn the tables on schools that have grabbed recruits like Miller, Calof, etc... heck even Bracco. I get that admissions is still playing tough guy but I want to believe they'll have a change of heart and not be so restrictive in the future. To get Bright-Landry rocking again would be very cool indeed!
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

I'd be even more bullish if we can snag some recruits from other schools. Turn the tables on schools that have grabbed recruits like Miller, Calof, etc... heck even Bracco. I get that admissions is still playing tough guy but I want to believe they'll have a change of heart and not be so restrictive in the future. To get Bright-Landry rocking again would be very cool indeed!

A deep run in the NCAAs might just remind the admin that hockey has and always will be #1 at Harvard....and perhaps some of the old guard will come out and demand it.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

A deep run in the NCAAs might just remind the admin that hockey has and always will be #1 at Harvard....and perhaps some of the old guard will come out and demand it.

I don't know about being #1 - maybe 1A? You gotta give it up for the football program and all that Murphy has done during his time here. We're lucky to have him and the team is fun to watch week in and week out.

At last year's reunion of the '89 championship team, I saw some of those players during the game and they were extremely disappointed in the product on the ice. At some point, some of them may have spoken to Scalise and reminded him that having a winning hockey team is important for the school both locally and nationally. And let's face it, the season ticket renewals have been dropping for years and the fan survey they sent out two years ago came back with scathing comments about the program and Teddy. Hopefully they listened and we'll see the results with better recruiting in the future and a return to national prominence.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Will never replace football, thought to get by ball as well unless they drop off
Hockey is 3rd sport, unless of course you count crew, than hello 4th
 
Will never replace football, thought to get by ball as well unless they drop off
Hockey is 3rd sport, unless of course you count crew, than hello 4th

Can't be a #1 sport when you are not eligible for post season. That is where the admin fails big time.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Tell that to the sold out football tailgate or the tens of thousands of fans, than go to a hockey game and you will get to sit next to a Cornell fan
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Can't be a #1 sport when you are not eligible for post season. That is where the admin fails big time.

Okay, but that's not the team's fault. And by that logic, football would be behind men's and women's soccer and other sports that are eligible for the postseason (we haven't even discussed men's hoops which is all the rage at the the moment and has been to the NCAAs recently). Look, the men have won an NCAA championship and the women won the AWCHA in '99. So yes, hockey is very important but even without postseason participation, can you really put football behind men's hockey?
 
Okay, but that's not the team's fault. And by that logic, football would be behind men's and women's soccer and other sports that are eligible for the postseason (we haven't even discussed men's hoops which is all the rage at the the moment and has been to the NCAAs recently). Look, the men have won an NCAA championship and the women won the AWCHA in '99. So yes, hockey is very important but even without postseason participation, can you really put football behind men's hockey?

Of course not. Football pays for hockey
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Of course not. Football pays for hockey

Ah sorry, don't think that's the case at Harvard. Maybe at BC but not in Cambridge. For instance, the cost for keeping the rink cold and the ice hard used to be $10k a month. I'm sure that cost has gone up considerably and there is no way our football revenues (even with 35,000 at the Yale game) can support both a men's and women's hockey program.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

RPI's Goalie, Kasdorf, is very dangerous. He has not played in the past 5 games and RPI is an embarrassing 1.4 goals for, 4.6 goals against without him. They are a different team when he plays. What is often overlooked is that Kasdorf is 4-2 in ECAC play with an outstanding 1.6568 GAA and a .936 save average. I am sure he will be playing next Tuesday. While their numbers don't show it, RPI likes to make the first period their period. They are very good in close, 1 point games (4-1). Kasdorf can keep them in close games. They do have the worse out of conference record in the ECAC, 2-8, which is dragging the hole conference down.
 
Last edited:
Ah sorry, don't think that's the case at Harvard. Maybe at BC but not in Cambridge. For instance, the cost for keeping the rink cold and the ice hard used to be $10k a month. I'm sure that cost has gone up considerably and there is no way our football revenues (even with 35,000 at the Yale game) can support both a men's and women's hockey program.

Donations
Football pays for hockey
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

RPI's Goalie, Kasdorf, is very dangerous. He has not played in the past 5 games and RPI is an embarrassing 1.4 goals for, 4.6 goals against without him. They are a different team when he plays. What is often overlooked is that Kasdorf is 4-2 in ECAC play with an outstanding 1.6568 GAA and a .936 save average. I am sure he will be playing next Tuesday. While their numbers don't show it, RPI likes to make the first period their period. They are very good in close, 1 point games (4-1). Kasdorf can keep them in close games. They do have the worse out of conference record in the ECAC, 2-8, which is dragging the hole conference down.

We've faced some pretty good goalies this season already and Michalek isn't exactly chopped liver. I agree that RPI does very well in the first period - they played their best hockey in the first ten minutes of the first meeting with the Crimson in Troy. However, you don't win many games playing a great first period and so-so the rest of the way.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

Donations
Football pays for hockey

Well using that logic, football should pay for all sports at Harvard. Fact is, each program is responsible for fundraising beyond what the athletic budget apportions to their team. For example, men's hoop in recent years has been calling on hockey season ticket holders (like myself) to make donations to help Coach Amaker expand his recruiting reach with additional travel money. Dialing for dollars is a way of life at academic institutions and more so at Harvard.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014


This just reinforces my previous point. The athletic teams have their fundraising arms (Friends of Harvard Hockey, Friends of Harvard Basketball) that help defray costs for recruiting and resources the teams need to compete outside the Ivy League. For years the hockey program relied on the Belmont Hill pipeline thanks to Billy's association with the school. Times have changed and I want to believe the administration is waking up to the fact that other Ivies and ECAC schools have passed them by in supporting men's hockey at their respective schools (I mean if the Yale national championship didn't send a wake up call, what will?). I'd like to think that from here on in, Harvard's administration will demonstrate strong support for men's hockey and keep the team competitive for Frozen Four berths.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

While I have only recently discovered this forum, I have been a fan for some years now. Santa is bringing new Crimson gear for the whole family, and we are particularly looking forward to the Beanpot this year.

I asked my "why can't Harvard be ranked where I think their record indicates they should?" question in another thread. It sounds like I am supposed to root for Cornell in their Florida tournament games against western teams, for example. and I'm not sure how I feel about that.

Another question I have is why the active Harvard thread (unlike the other schools') is one that was started for the 2013-14 season. Are Harvard fans pretty rare here, despite their under-ranked #4 status?

Finally, I did not manage to secure Frozen Four tickets for Boston Garden this year, though I am reasonably certain that Harvard will be there. From the ticket buy/sell page here, it looks as if there might be availability later on when some of the other teams are knocked off in the run up, is that the case? I also would love to get still-available tickets for the regionals in Manchester or Providence, but I'm not at all sure how to guess with any confidence where my team might be assigned.

Thanks in advance . . .
 
Last edited:
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014

While I have only recently discovered this forum, I have been a fan for some years now. Santa is bringing new Crimson gear for the whole family, and we are particularly looking forward to the Beanpot this year.

I asked my "why can't Harvard be ranked where I think their record indicates they should?" question in another thread. It sounds like I am supposed to root for Cornell in their Florida tournament games against western teams, for example. and I'm not sure how I feel about that.

Another question I have is why the active Harvard thread (unlike the other schools') is one that was started for the 2013-14 season. Are Harvard fans pretty rare here, despite their under-ranked #4 status?

Finally, I did not manage to secure Frozen Four tickets for Boston Garden this year, though I am reasonably certain that Harvard will be there. From the ticket buy/sell page here, it looks as if there might be availability later on when some of the other teams are knocked off in the run up, is that the case? I also would love to get still-available tickets for the regionals in Manchester or Providence, but I'm not at all sure how to guess with any confidence where my team might be assigned.

Thanks in advance . . .

So a couple of things.

1) Polls are, depending on who you ask, mostly or entirely meaningless. The "best" rating to pay attention to is the Pairwise rankings, which simulate how the NCAA committee weights different things to make their tournament. Harvard is ranked #2 in the country using that metric. I say "best" because most people would agree the Pairwise is not altogether a good measurement, like KRACH, but it is designed to match the NCAA selection criteria.
As for rooting for Cornell, this is a quirk of the Pairwise system. If Cornell does well and Harvard beats them, Harvard gets some credit for the teams Cornell beat. The Pairwise also has something known as a TUC, or team under consideration. Some teams are so bad that playing them hurts your standing in the Pairwise (I'm simplifying a little here). So you can always cheer for Cornell to be so bad that they fall under the TUC cliff, and thus as a team not under consideration, their games, and any wins or losses against them, don't really matter. I couldn't tell you how Cornell being or not being a TUC would affect Harvard's Pairwise ranking.

2) Harvard fans are pretty rare here (there and everywhere, to save all you wiseguys the trouble). Of the most active, you have bothman, skate79, myself and veritas, and then a few other people who chime in from time to time. Typically we do a thread for each year but no one got around to starting it at the beginning of the season. And then we started doing well and I, being a superstitious fellow, suggested we just stay in this thread.

3) Knowing where the Crimson will end up for the regionals depends on a host of factors because the NCAA has a labyrinth of rules and desires for the tournament.
The relevant rules are basically - try to protect higher seeds, keep travel to a minimum, host schools get to host, have good attendance, and not necessarily in that order
If the season ended today, the teams would be:
1s: Minnesota State, Harvard, Minnesota-Duluth, Nebraska-Omaha; 2s: Miami, Michigan Tech, Vermont, Boston University; 3s: Bowling Green, North Dakota, Minnesota, UMass-Lowell; 4s: Denver, Merrimack, Yale, Penn State.
In a straight seeding, Minnesota State would most likely compete in the west, leaving both eastern sites open for Harvard. But since that site is North Dakota's host site, they have to be there. Likely, the committee would try to protect the #1 seed by moving Minnesota State out of Fargo because if they had to play North Dakota, that's a de facto home game for NoDak even though they are the lower seed. Since the 8th ranked team is BU, Minnesota State would possibly come east, meaning they would get either Providence or New Hampshire. Etc. Etc.
The point of that is to say this - the second the Pairwise rankings change, this all goes out the window. But there will likely be seats available closer to game time.

As for the Frozen Four, if Harvard makes it, the school will have a small block of tickets and hopefully many fans whose teams did not make it will resell them on Stubhub and the like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top