What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

I think shoulder injuries are a lot easier to recover from than a knee injury or something of that ilk. Spoke with a source at Harvard who said he's been skating and appears ready to go.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

Nice get for Harvard. Michael Floodstrand - F (USNDT, Chicago Mission) coming in 2015. More to come.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

Pre-season polls are out. Harvard is 6th in coaches poll and 10th in media poll:

http://www.dailygazette.com/weblogs...ps-ecach-media-preseason-poll-union-fourth-i/

6th place ECAC?! Pretty generous considering H had 5 wins last season and landed in last place in the league... H's worst season in its history. Like I ask every year... when are you guys going to demand Scalise fire that inept idiot coach? Or, are you "still" going to stand by Donato?
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

6th place ECAC?! Pretty generous considering H had 5 wins last season and landed in last place in the league... H's worst season in its history. Like I ask every year... when are you guys going to demand Scalise fire that inept idiot coach? Or, are you "still" going to stand by Donato?

Seems a bit harsh but point taken. I took a quick look and here are the HU league wins (22 game per season) over the past 5 years: 6 - 8 - 7 -7 -9 (34% winning % excluding ties). Not very impressive for a team that historically has been at or near the top of the ECAC. It appears, IMO, that the recruiting continues to go well with this years incoming class considered another high-end class on top of last year's strong recruiting class. Although the roster looks relatively young, there's no shortage of talent, especially at the forward position. The question is, what will the coaching staff do differently to reverse its losing ways? Better systems, particularly in their own end and in the neutral zone would be a good place to start. Gap control is non-existent from the D. More puck possession and better puck support upfront would also be a good way to leverage their skill and quickness against the bigger and more physical teams from NY. I'd also like to see the coaches get more effort and consistency from their players. Motivation at the college level goes a long way, especially with so few league games. The team culture needs to change. More leadership is required as well as a total team commitment to winning. In too many games I've witnessed Harvard gets outworked, particularly in the later stages of the games. These are just a few observations. Again, what is going to change this year with so many freshman in the lineup? If nothing changes this team will finish at or near the bottom again once again despite the individual talent on the team.
 
6th place ECAC?! Pretty generous considering H had 5 wins last season and landed in last place in the league... H's worst season in its history. Like I ask every year... when are you guys going to demand Scalise fire that inept idiot coach? Or, are you "still" going to stand by Donato?

Please stick head back up arse. Thank you.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

6th place ECAC?! Pretty generous considering H had 5 wins last season and landed in last place in the league... H's worst season in its history. Like I ask every year... when are you guys going to demand Scalise fire that inept idiot coach? Or, are you "still" going to stand by Donato?

Coaching question aside it would appear that Harvard should be one of the teams with the most upside that finished in the 8 through 12 spots last year. Harvard spent most of last year short handed on the defensive side of the ice and they should be much stronger in their d zone this year. Throw in the goaltending of Girard and return of Michalek home ice doesn't seem that far fetched. In the ECAC it only takes about 8/9 wins for home ice and an 8th place or higher finish. That's only 2 or 3 more wins then last year with a stronger team.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

You are a class act, Bothman; I am often surprised at the "trash" they let into The College.

Class Act? This coming from the guy who periodically comes to this Website and anonymously asks for a coach to be fired.

Eaglehockeyrules, you get what you give.
 
Re: Harvard Crimson 2012-2013

Seems a bit harsh but point taken. I took a quick look and here are the HU league wins (22 game per season) over the past 5 years: 6 - 8 - 7 -7 -9 (34% winning % excluding ties). Not very impressive for a team that historically has been at or near the top of the ECAC. It appears, IMO, that the recruiting continues to go well with this years incoming class considered another high-end class on top of last year's strong recruiting class. Although the roster looks relatively young, there's no shortage of talent, especially at the forward position. The question is, what will the coaching staff do differently to reverse its losing ways? Better systems, particularly in their own end and in the neutral zone would be a good place to start. Gap control is non-existent from the D. More puck possession and better puck support upfront would also be a good way to leverage their skill and quickness against the bigger and more physical teams from NY. I'd also like to see the coaches get more effort and consistency from their players. Motivation at the college level goes a long way, especially with so few league games. The team culture needs to change. More leadership is required as well as a total team commitment to winning. In too many games I've witnessed Harvard gets outworked, particularly in the later stages of the games. These are just a few observations. Again, what is going to change this year with so many freshman in the lineup? If nothing changes this team will finish at or near the bottom again once again despite the individual talent on the team.
Spot on.
 
Back
Top