Re: Graduation Rate information
Off the cuff...there are quite a few schools that were less competitive and had smaller annual donation totals before they made a splash on the sports scene. Then, they get national recognition for football or basketball and the pride swells up for alums who come back to campus for games and donate more during the year.
The volume of apps goes up as well so the school can fill its seats with fewer C and B students, making it more competitive in the relative rankings. Although, one could argue that the school isn't better, it just admitted better students who may be getting the same education as the 'dumber kids' in the class above them.
I thought that economic effect was a motivation for schools that go from 1AA to 1 ...it isn't just that they want to play D1.
No, overall. BSU and Idaho are also state funded schools- Idaho being the formal state school- ag, law, engineering etc. One problem for the two schools is that education isn't a high priority in the state....
I really am starting to think that lots of the B10 success is that they very much concentrate on the acedemic side of things- see all of the info posted on the B10 expansion thread on the hockey side of things. That was very, very interesting to me, and, even as an alum, I had no idea.
While the B10 schools seem happy to let the face be altheltics to many people, behind the scenes, they are a very small part of the pie. I checked a recent set of data at Michigan, and the entire Athletic budget is less than 2% of the whole school- just under $100M vs $5.5B. I would not be surprised that any B10 school spends <5% on athletics.
But a lot out west are trying to make the case that expanded athletic spending will help the school- and to a point- I agree. But I also think it's short term gains- the school will be much stronger if the SCHOOL is strong- both for teaching and research. Make more graduates that contribute to your state's economy, and you make more tax dollars to go along with the circular research funding and private donations.
Off the cuff...there are quite a few schools that were less competitive and had smaller annual donation totals before they made a splash on the sports scene. Then, they get national recognition for football or basketball and the pride swells up for alums who come back to campus for games and donate more during the year.
The volume of apps goes up as well so the school can fill its seats with fewer C and B students, making it more competitive in the relative rankings. Although, one could argue that the school isn't better, it just admitted better students who may be getting the same education as the 'dumber kids' in the class above them.
I thought that economic effect was a motivation for schools that go from 1AA to 1 ...it isn't just that they want to play D1.