ARM
Fan of chipmunk-like mascots.
The teammates have to kill all of her penalty minutes, and if you aren't on the PK, then you have to sit and watch for long minutes. So my guess for the teammates would be, yeah.Do the Minnesota fans, players, coaches ever get tired of Murphy’s antics?
Fans? We got to live this in stereo for a year with the Lams, although the melodrama dial seems to have been turned up a couple of notches. Can't speak for other MN fans, but I would have welcomed a reduction in nonsense long ago.
Coaches? I think the Minnesota coach needs to provide a definitive answer here, and I don't mean on this forum. Can he help her? If yes, that help is overdue. If not, maybe Muzzy would be a good mentor -- she had some of the same tendencies, although not to the same degree.
I wonder if the player herself tires of this. In the era of NIL and women's pro hockey, there is the potential of earning real dollars through the game, in addition to the beyond the game opportunities to which hockey fame can be a stepping stone. Both in terms of life and hockey, this is hurting her more than anyone else (with the possible exception of Timothy, who may need to increase his time in therapy).
At this point, Murphy's situation reminds me a little of someone who might want to escape a substance abuse problem but is now in an environment that is going to make it difficult to go clean. Opponents have scores to settle, and officials and rival coaches have witnessed a litany of bad behavior. If she became a model citizen overnight, that isn't the way that they're going to see her. She'll continue to attract abuse, even if she no longer deserves it, and the refs will look away.
Yesterday, the five and done wasn't even the biggest problem. At least in that case, she was trying to make a hockey play to clear the puck on the PK; she just ran into the St. Thomas/freshman version of herself.
Ultimately, she spends far too much time and energy in back-and-forth chaos with players who aren't at her level. When they get matching penalties, that's a win for the other team.
Regarding robertearle's Q about the Kaz, the voters know her history. There isn't any clear guidance, so everyone will draw a line in different places. In the past, we've seen those with similar blemishes on their resumes get into the top three, but not win. Usually, there are several players roughly equal in terms of hockey impact, so bad behavior, spotty academics, etc. make it easier for voters to give the top spot to someone who is equally deserving, didn't have the best raw stats, but had the admiration of the voters.