What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

dropthatpuck

In Vino Veritas
Watcher is still all wet. Debating this with him is like debating abortion. No movement on either side - and he still doesn't get it.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

....and slappy continues to call out the right, but refuses to acknowledge the left's transgressions when discussing this topic.

What's new.

I love terrorist apologetics. Pathetic, but an interesting peek at the inner workings of some of our finest posters who love to hate on American institutions or groups expressing their first amendment rights that don't fit in with their political ideology.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

We're still talking about this? Seriously?
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Watcher is still all wet. Debating this with him is like debating abortion. No movement on either side - and he still doesn't get it.

This is like MST3K in a vacant room.

Do we get to use this thread for fun and the Kepler thread for actual discourse?
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

This is like MST3K in a vacant room.

Do we get to use this thread for fun and the Kepler thread for actual discourse?

Whoa! Wait a minute! When did actual discourse become a requirement for any thread? Was there a memo? :confused: :eek: :(
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

This is like MST3K in a vacant room.

Do we get to use this thread for fun and the Kepler thread for actual discourse?

Well, that would be up to you. ;) (Calling somebody out in a thread title is against Forum rules, so this may not last anyway. I think he just wanted to get in one message to me that wouldn't be Ignored. Lonely, I guess.)
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

This is like MST3K in a vacant room.

Do we get to use this thread for fun and the Kepler thread for actual discourse?

Sure. The last one was silly, Kep's is sillier and this may be the silliest of all.

More hypocrisy from vacation boy calling someone else out on forum rules is funny as well.

This topic is just a barrel full of laughs.

I'm still waiting for Watcher and the others to explain how they can apologize for the likes of 9/11 guys and hate the NRA more. That'd be more fun right there if they could ever make a coherent argument.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Was Cheneys plan ever used? Did they catch anyone with it?
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Was Cheneys plan ever used? Did they catch anyone with it?

From what I've read the "plan" was more of a big idea that never got off the ground. Since it was never implemented the decision was made to not inform Congress. Presumably, if they had "pulled the trigger" literally or figuratively, they would have notified the oversight committee(s) at some point.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

From what I've read the "plan" was more of a big idea that never got off the ground. Since it was never implemented the decision was made to not inform Congress. Presumably, if they had "pulled the trigger" literally or figuratively, they would have notified the oversight committee(s) at some point.

Thats what I've heard also. If this is the case whats the big deal or is it just another smoke show to cover up something else(as in Nancy Pelosi)
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

what exactly was this "plan"?

Tell Bin Laden and his cronies that they won a free Bahamas cruise, and when they showed up capture or kill them in international waters. Not sure why they never ran with it ...
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

....and slappy continues to call out the right, but refuses to acknowledge the left's transgressions when discussing this topic.

Here's a mirror - the next time you pat Obama on the back will be the first.

Of course I've already noted I'm not in favor of his health care plan, I think the Gitmo closing needed more forethought and I'm also of the belief the bailout went way too far (not sure how far is too far yet). I have other criticisms, but since any slight to the right or yourself =OMGTHATGUYISSUCHAFARGINGLIBERALOMG!!! that I won't waste my time going further. :)
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Thats what I've heard also. If this is the case whats the big deal or is it just another smoke show to cover up something else(as in Nancy Pelosi)

You answered your own question. It has no substance.

Here's a mirror - the next time you pat Obama on the back will be the first.

Of course I've already noted I'm not in favor of his health care plan, I think the Gitmo closing needed more forethought and I'm also of the belief the bailout went way too far (not sure how far is too far yet). I have other criticisms, but since any slight to the right or yourself =OMGTHATGUYISSUCHAFARGINGLIBERALOMG!!! that I won't waste my time going further. :)

Congratulations on feeling that you're the least bit objective. Jack Handey would be proud of you. What part of "this topic" didn't you get?
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Don't disrespect the Mike Nifong thread. That was a classic.

Glad to see you figured out how to use the search function. Just think - it only took you a half dozen years and at least 3 screen names.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

If an instrument existed that could measure the level of one's hypocrisy, you'd break the mother******. :D

You should make like Humpty Dumpty and fall to the left already. It must be uncomfortable sitting on that picket fence of yours.
 
Re: Global War on Terror, Part III - Kepler's Biased Thread Title Sucks

Tell Bin Laden and his cronies that they won a free Bahamas cruise, and when they showed up capture or kill them in international waters. Not sure why they never ran with it ...

And they would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for those meddling kids.
 
Back
Top