There is no consensus needed when both Chuck Schwartz and I have confirmed with the writer that two versions were written and one was accidentally posted by someone else at madison.com
There is no consensus needed when both Chuck Schwartz and I have confirmed with the writer that two versions were written and one was accidentally posted by someone else at madison.com
As I said, I have no doubt there were two stories written. The mystery is, why was one posted? And why was it the one where he won and not the one where he lost? Hmmm?
Inquiring minds want to know.
**** happens, before the scott brown vs martha coakley special election, boston.com accidentally had full results for the election posted showing coakley winning 51% to 49%, it ended up being a test run of the system but it was available for anyone that wanted to see the results for a short while...I'm sure both were "posted," but neither was suppose to be posted somewhere that the public could get to...
Really? Anybody see the other one?
Yes he does!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I know someone on the committee (the dad of one of my kid's hockey teammates), I should let him know about this article.
Edit: Sent it to the committee member.
sorry...by "posted" I meant to infer that both were posted on a restricted portion of madison.com not accessible to the public...honestly the screw up is probably a matter of a check box or properties field for the webpage itself...its really a simple mistake that is being blown out of proportion...although I do think Blake will and should win the Hobey...
Congrats to Blake! It's about time Wisconsin has a Hobey Baker winner.
Congrats to Blake! It's about time Wisconsin has a Hobey Baker winner.