One thing that stood out to me this year with the ECAC was all the **** ties. In some of the games I watched during the regular season it almost seemed like both teams accepted the tie result as the ot's were very defensive oriented. I am not surprised to see Cornell go to ot, but I am surprised that it did not go two ot's. Keep these games low scoring and the ECAC will hang around, they are used to it.
Michigan has won more NCAA ice hockey championships than any other team in history. Do those qualify as accomplishments?
And weren't they offering scholarships when nobody else was?Yeah, but weren't they paying their mostly Canadian roster for like 7 of those?
By my count, Michigan has two legitimate titles.
No it won't.Get to the FF, get to the National Title game, win a title and it will shut a lot of people up.
I just root for a state school, but even I know the ECAC will be playing in three games today.We have two games today, this is great,and greater "today" to be an ECAC fan !!
And weren't they offering scholarships when nobody else was?
haha. fair enough!
In Hockey East, we've seen/dealt with a suddenly appearing, oft-over-the-top, ballyhoo band of Merrimack fans who not only avoid the practice of: "act like you've been there before", but think everything they do should be heralded as the greatest thing since the wheel.
Dirty's a nut case, no doubt.
El wrongo. At least the part about me repping our good buddy UHall6. He did neg rep me though and tell me to "eat a bag of dicks". Who's stalking whom?!?!?!?![]()
Yeah, but weren't they paying their mostly Canadian roster for like 7 of those?
By my count, Michigan has two legitimate titles.![]()
Agreed. I'm a huge ECAC fan, but lets just sit back and watch what happens today. However, just because the ECAC isn't relevant, doesn't mean Cornell isn't. In the past decade (+1 year) they've gone to a Frozen Four, made the tourney 7 times, taken two eventual national champs to at least 2 OT, and only had one real under performance (2010). I love that the league had a good night, but I'm definitely not ready to act like that changes the rest of the leagues lack of success. At the same time, just because the league hasn't been relevant doesn't mean that some of its teams haven't been.It's the first time the ECAC has had two teams win a game in the tournament since 1996.
Since Hockey East broke away in 1984 that is the ONLY time the ECAC has advanced two teams. Let's not act like the ECAC is suddenly relevant because they accomplished a feat for only the second time in three decades.
Congratulations on getting two teams to the second round. Now we'll see if one or both of them can advance to Tampa. But it's going to take a couple of seasons of success before most people on this board take the ECAC seriously.
You really know nothing about ECAC Hockey if Union and Yale are the two teams you take out of the league to make that point...9 of the 10 teams in Hockey East have made the NCAA by way of at-large bid, all of whom have landed higher than a regional 4 seed, since the last time the ECAC has advanced a team to the Frozen Four
Yea, Hockey East's national legitimacy starts and stops on the coattails of BC and BU.
And your point is so asinine...
Gee, when you look at recent history, take BC and BU out of Hockey East and it's not as successful...
OK, then while you do that....
Take Union and Yale out of the ECAC
Take Michigan and Miami out of the CCHA
Take North Dakota and Duluth out of the WCHA
And square off again!
Looking over these last 2 or 3 years, I'll take my chances with UNH, Merrimack, Maine and a few of these Lowell teams over whatever the ECAC's 2nd tier has to offer.
You're right... let me address the left out part...If Atlantic Hockey made a celebratory thread, you could go in and tell them how good you were when Reagan was president and they were DIII
Sorry bro. You tried to lump together HE and Atlantic in the same package. It was a good try, though.
Soooo, what did Atlantic Hockey do to you guys?
Now, back to the real purpose of this thread........7277