I have wondered for years why the Ivies don't form their own 6-team league. If nothing else, this assures an auto-bid for an Ivy each year. I think the Ivies have been able to compete remarkably well considering how hamstrung the Ivy teams are by the oppressive Ivy rules. Less games, no transfers (virtually), and no scholarships. These rules put them in their own, very unique, basket.
I don't agree that the Ivy's future is bleak. But I do think that the teams would just be better off in their league. Why not? Why not take the auto-bid and compete with the other teams that need to abide by the Ivy rules? The fact that the Ivies still don't allow their hockey teams to play the same number of games as other teams is just a dumb rule. But it's been in existence forever.
Both men's and women's hoops for the Ivies have their tournament to determine an auto bid to the NCAAs so it stands to reason that hockey would benefit from separating from the ECAC. It would depend on how the Ivies want to fill out the remaining schedule of games from outside the league. Harvard's biggest hockey rival is Cornell for men's hockey, and Yale for women's hockey; we don't have a true rivalry with any of the ECAC schools. Since Hockey East was formed, it's been tough to compete with BC, BU, and Northeastern consistently so I could see a day when we stop playing them altogether.
The Dartmouth men's hoops team's recent NLRB ruling bears watching especially as it relates to the Ivy hockey programs. Both men and women hockey players have a chance to turn pro after college so it wouldn't be a stretch to see the day when the hockey players at the Ivies want some form of compensation for playing for their college. Harvard would fight it tooth and nail but given how many of our players have gone on to the NHL, they may have to come to some kind of agreement if they want the teams to compete in D-1.