USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
- Thread starter lugnut92
- Start date
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Dawn Of
The Seventeenth Day (of February)
--- 24 games remain ---
The new projections are basically a series of ties. Cornell and Quinnipiac will fight for first place, followed by Yale, Harvard, and Clarkson are in a tight race for the last two byes, then an effective three-way tie for sixth between Brown, Union, and Dartmouth, and finally the bottom four slightly more spread out.
Simulated Final Standings (Monte Carlo simulation of 10^11.45 possibilites; n=1,000,000):
Rank and Points breakdown:
Playoff Matchups:
Dawn Of
The Seventeenth Day (of February)
--- 24 games remain ---
The new projections are basically a series of ties. Cornell and Quinnipiac will fight for first place, followed by Yale, Harvard, and Clarkson are in a tight race for the last two byes, then an effective three-way tie for sixth between Brown, Union, and Dartmouth, and finally the bottom four slightly more spread out.
Simulated Final Standings (Monte Carlo simulation of 10^11.45 possibilites; n=1,000,000):
- Cornell
- Quinnipiac
- Yale
- Harvard
————— - Clarkson
- Brown
- Union
- Dartmouth
————— - RPI
- Colgate
- Princeton
- SLU
Rank and Points breakdown:
Code:
| KRACH | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |Avg Rk |AvgPts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 239.0 | [B]46.9[/B] 37.9 10.3 3.7 1.0 0.1 0.0 x x x x x | 1.74 | 30.48
Qu | 368.3 | [B]43.1[/B] 34.2 13.6 6.3 2.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 x x x x | 1.92 | 29.90
Ya | 146.1 | 4.4 11.2 [B]25.7[/B] 25.3 24.6 7.2 1.5 0.2 x x x x | 3.83 | 27.12
Ha | 193.0 | 1.3 7.9 [B]27.9[/B] 25.9 26.8 7.5 2.3 0.4 0.0 x x x | 4.03 | 26.92
Ck | 202.4 | 4.2 8.7 21.5 [B]33.4[/B] 26.1 5.1 0.9 0.1 x x x x | 3.88 | 26.66
Br | 99.0 | x 0.0 0.3 1.5 6.0 32.1 [B]32.5[/B] 26.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 x | 6.79 | 22.52
Un | 160.0 | x 0.0 0.2 1.5 6.2 25.5 [B]34.5[/B] 28.9 3.0 0.2 0.0 x | 6.92 | 22.48
Da | 79.8 | 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.3 6.8 22.3 27.4 [B]36.9[/B] 3.6 0.0 0.0 x | 6.99 | 22.47
RP | 62.5 | x x x x 0.0 0.1 0.7 5.3 [B]53.0[/B] 29.3 11.6 x | 9.46 | 17.03
Cg | 52.0 | x x x x x 0.0 0.2 1.8 34.1 [B]50.0[/B] 13.9 0.0 | 9.75 | 16.36
Pr | 60.5 | x x x x x x 0.0 0.2 4.9 20.4 [B]73.9[/B] 0.6 | 10.70 | 14.41
SL | 19.5 | x x x x x x x x x 0.0 0.6 [B]99.4[/B] | 11.99 | 7.65
| KRACH | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 |AvgPts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 239.0 | 0.2 0.6 3.6 6.3 18.3 16.7 [B]28.8[/B] 12.2 13.4 | 30.48
Qu | 368.3 | 0.1 0.3 2.0 4.2 13.4 15.4 [B]29.5[/B] 15.9 19.4 | 29.90
Ya | 146.1 | 2.4 3.5 14.6 13.5 [B]26.9[/B] 14.5 17.2 4.3 3.2 | 27.12
Ha | 193.0 | 0.9 1.6 7.9 9.3 22.4 16.1 [B]24.4[/B] 8.7 8.7 | 26.92
Ck | 202.4 | 0.9 1.8 9.2 10.8 [B]25.9[/B] 16.5 22.7 6.5 5.6 | 26.66
Br | 99.0 | 5.0 5.9 20.7 15.8 [B]26.0[/B] 11.7 11.2 2.4 1.4 | 22.52
Un | 160.0 | 1.5 2.5 11.4 11.7 [B]25.5[/B] 15.6 20.7 6.0 5.2 | 22.48
Da | 79.8 | 5.9 6.5 21.0 15.5 [B]24.6[/B] 11.2 11.1 2.5 1.7 | 22.47
RP | 62.5 | 8.5 8.7 [B]25.3[/B] 16.6 22.6 8.9 7.2 1.4 0.7 | 17.03
Cg | 52.0 | 5.0 6.3 23.2 16.8 [B]26.0[/B] 10.9 9.2 1.8 0.9 | 16.36
Pr | 60.5 | 4.6 6.0 23.1 16.7 [B]25.7[/B] 11.0 9.7 2.0 1.1 | 14.41
SL | 19.5 | 27.1 20.4 [B]28.3[/B] 13.0 8.2 2.2 0.7 0.1 0.0 | 7.65
[b]Bold[/b] is each team's most likely outcome.
0.0 means the outcome occurred, but fewer than 500 times.
x means the outcome never occurred.
A blank space means the outcome is impossible.Playoff Matchups:
Code:
| Cr Qu Ya Ha Ck Br Un Da RP Cg Pr SL | BYE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | x x x x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 | 98.9
Qu | x x x x x x x 0.0 0.1 0.3 2.5 | 97.2
Ya | x x x x 0.0 0.0 x 1.7 2.0 5.2 24.5 | 66.6
Ha | x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.5 6.4 26.6 | 63.0
Ck | x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.1 3.8 25.9 | 67.9
Br | x x x x x 0.3 0.1 27.5 27.9 34.8 6.2 | 1.8
Un | x x x x x 0.1 0.3 27.8 34.7 25.8 6.4 | 1.7
Da | x x x x x 0.1 0.2 33.9 29.0 23.2 6.9 | 2.9
RP | x x x 0.0 x 0.4 1.7 3.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 | NO
Cg | x x x x x 0.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 x | NO
Pr | x x x x x 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x | NO
SL | x x x x x x x x x x x | NO
Hosts on the left, visitors across the top.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Midweekend update...
Simulated Final Standings (Monte Carlo simulation of 10^8.59 possibilites; n=1,000,000):
Rank and Points breakdown:
Playoff Matchups:
Midweekend update...
Simulated Final Standings (Monte Carlo simulation of 10^8.59 possibilites; n=1,000,000):
- Quinnipiac
- Cornell
- Harvard
- Clarkson
————— - Yale
- Dartmouth
- Brown
- Union
————— - RPI
- Colgate
- Princeton
- SLU
Rank and Points breakdown:
Code:
| KRACH | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |Avg Rk |AvgPts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qu | 375.7 | [B]72.4[/B] 17.0 7.4 2.2 1.0 0.1 x x x x x x | 1.42 | 30.22
Cr | 210.6 | 17.2 [B]51.1[/B] 18.4 9.9 3.1 0.3 x x x x x x | 2.31 | 28.92
Ha | 203.6 | 6.0 19.1 [B]41.0[/B] 19.3 12.1 2.6 0.1 x x x x x | 3.21 | 27.76
Ck | 192.8 | 3.0 7.7 17.0 [B]35.0[/B] 28.7 8.1 0.4 0.0 x x x x | 4.05 | 26.14
Ya | 130.6 | 1.5 5.0 14.3 23.5 [B]31.5[/B] 22.8 1.4 0.1 x x x x | 4.53 | 25.68
Da | 88.9 | 0.0 0.2 1.9 9.9 20.2 [B]36.7[/B] 19.4 10.4 1.4 x x x | 5.98 | 23.88
Br | 92.6 | x x x 0.1 2.0 21.7 [B]46.4[/B] 22.5 6.7 0.6 x x | 7.12 | 21.64
Un | 143.7 | x x x 0.1 1.4 7.4 26.5 [B]40.6[/B] 20.5 3.4 0.1 x | 7.82 | 20.89
RP | 70.3 | x x x x x 0.3 4.3 18.0 [B]41.4[/B] 31.4 4.6 x | 9.13 | 18.55
Cg | 59.4 | x x x x x x 1.7 8.5 29.0 [B]55.1[/B] 5.8 x | 9.55 | 17.90
Pr | 65.0 | x x x x x x x 0.0 0.9 9.6 [B]89.4[/B] 0.1 | 10.89 | 15.03
SL | 19.6 | x x x x x x x x x x 0.1 [B]99.9[/B] | 12.00 | 7.38
| KRACH | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 |AvgPts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qu | 375.7 | 1.1 2.1 11.2 12.1 [B]31.7[/B] 16.4 25.5 | 30.22
Cr | 210.6 | 1.1 2.7 15.8 14.4 [B]34.3[/B] 13.4 18.4 | 28.92
Ha | 203.6 | 2.7 3.7 17.5 14.2 [B]32.1[/B] 12.6 17.2 | 27.76
Ck | 192.8 | 5.3 6.3 26.8 16.3 [B]29.3[/B] 8.0 8.0 | 26.14
Ya | 130.6 | 9.7 9.1 [B]31.8[/B] 16.1 23.6 5.4 4.4 | 25.68
Da | 88.9 | 9.0 8.2 [B]28.1[/B] 15.4 25.6 6.8 6.8 | 23.88
Br | 92.6 | 10.5 9.4 [B]31.2[/B] 15.9 24.0 5.2 3.8 | 21.64
Un | 143.7 | 8.6 8.1 [B]28.4[/B] 15.6 25.7 6.8 6.7 | 20.89
RP | 70.3 | 12.3 10.2 [B]31.3[/B] 15.3 22.0 5.0 4.0 | 18.55
Cg | 59.4 | 6.7 7.5 [B]30.4[/B] 16.6 27.3 6.3 5.2 | 17.90
Pr | 65.0 | 5.9 6.8 [B]28.9[/B] 16.5 27.9 7.1 6.9 | 15.03
SL | 19.6 | [B]34.3[/B] 19.8 28.7 9.6 6.3 1.0 0.3 | 7.38
[b]Bold[/b] is each team's most likely outcome.
0.0 means the outcome occurred, but fewer than 500 times.
x means the outcome never occurred.
A blank space means the outcome is impossible.Playoff Matchups:
Code:
| Qu Cr Ha Ck Ya Da Br Un RP Cg Pr SL | BYE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qu | x x x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.0 | 99.0
Cr | x x x x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.1 | 96.6
Ha | x x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 2.4 12.1 | 85.3
Ck | x x x x x 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 7.6 28.7 | 62.8
Ya | x x x x x 0.0 0.1 2.6 2.9 18.7 31.5 | 44.3
Da | x x x x x 0.1 1.3 14.0 16.7 34.3 20.2 | 11.9
Br | x x x x x 0.1 4.5 28.2 32.4 25.3 2.0 | 0.1
Un | x x x x x 0.6 1.9 29.6 32.4 10.1 1.4 | 0.1
RP | x x x x x 0.7 1.8 14.0 5.1 1.0 x | NO
Cg | x x x x x x 3.5 4.0 2.3 0.3 x | NO
Pr | x x x x x x x 0.0 x x x | NO
SL | x x x x x x x x x x x | NO
Hosts on the left, visitors across the top.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Here we are, staring the final weekend of games in the face and almost nothing is set in stone (Sorry SLU). Three teams have a decent chance to take first overall, six teams could get a bye, eleven (!) teams could host in the first round, and conversely seven teams could be on the road. Let's see how it all plays out!
NOTE: I'm pretty sure Dartmouth can still end up in ninth, it just requires a four-way tie with Brown, Colgate, and Union, and this sim doesn't do four-way ties. I'm not sure if Brown is definitely out of the byes, I didn't play around enough to see if I could get them in.
Simulated Final Standings (EXHAUSTIVE search of 531,441 possibilities):
Rank and Points breakdown:
Playoff Matchups:
Here we are, staring the final weekend of games in the face and almost nothing is set in stone (Sorry SLU). Three teams have a decent chance to take first overall, six teams could get a bye, eleven (!) teams could host in the first round, and conversely seven teams could be on the road. Let's see how it all plays out!
NOTE: I'm pretty sure Dartmouth can still end up in ninth, it just requires a four-way tie with Brown, Colgate, and Union, and this sim doesn't do four-way ties. I'm not sure if Brown is definitely out of the byes, I didn't play around enough to see if I could get them in.
Simulated Final Standings (EXHAUSTIVE search of 531,441 possibilities):
- Cornell
- Quinnipiac
- Harvard
- Clarkson
————— - Yale
- Dartmouth
- Brown
- Union
————— - Colgate
- RPI
- Princeton
- SLU
Rank and Points breakdown:
Code:
| KRACH | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |Avg Rk |AvgPts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 225.8 | [B]51.3[/B] 22.6 16.9 8.9 0.3 x x x x x x x | 1.84 | 29.76
Qu | 329.6 | 28.4 [B]31.6[/B] 24.9 11.4 3.6 x x x x x x x | 2.30 | 28.86
Ha | 218.0 | 13.8 29.3 [B]35.0[/B] 21.2 0.7 x x x x x x x | 2.66 | 28.68
Ck | 210.8 | 6.5 16.4 21.1 [B]49.1[/B] 6.9 0.0 x x x x x x | 3.33 | 27.44
Ya | 121.5 | 0.0 0.1 2.1 8.7 [B]67.2[/B] 18.9 3.0 x x x x x | 5.12 | 24.85
Da | 82.2 | x x x 0.6 16.0 30.3 [B]41.7[/B] 11.3 x x x x | 6.47 | 22.90
Br | 99.7 | x x x x 5.3 [B]48.6[/B] 41.7 4.1 0.3 x x x | 6.46 | 22.71
Un | 135.3 | x x x x x 2.1 11.8 [B]55.0[/B] 21.3 9.2 0.6 x | 8.25 | 20.01
Cg | 62.8 | x x x x x x 1.8 22.2 [B]58.2[/B] 16.9 0.9 x | 8.93 | 19.00
RP | 63.6 | x x x x x x x 7.4 18.8 [B]58.3[/B] 15.4 x | 9.81 | 17.42
Pr | 66.9 | x x x x x x x 0.0 1.4 15.6 [B]83.0[/B] x | 10.82 | 15.58
SL | 18.5 | x x x x x x x x x x x [B]100.0[/B] | [B]12.00[/B] | 6.79
| KRACH | 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 |AvgPts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 225.8 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 2.7 6.5 [B]38.2[/B] 16.8 35.8 | 29.76
Qu | 329.6 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 4.7 5.8 30.0 17.4 [B]42.0[/B] x | 28.86
Ha | 218.0 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 6.5 7.1 34.5 16.2 [B]35.8[/B] x | 28.68
Ck | 210.8 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 8.9 8.7 [B]40.0[/B] 14.6 27.9 x x | 27.44
Ya | 121.5 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 19.4 12.6 [B]44.3[/B] 10.6 13.0 x x x x | 24.85
Da | 82.2 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x 20.3 12.3 [B]40.4[/B] 11.0 16.0 x x x x x x | 22.90
Br | 99.7 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x 23.1 13.6 [B]43.2[/B] 9.7 10.4 x x x x x x | 22.71
Un | 135.3 | x x x x x x x x x x 17.5 11.6 [B]41.4[/B] 11.7 17.8 x x x x x x x x x | 20.01
Cg | 62.8 | x x x x x x x x x 13.2 11.6 [B]50.3[/B] 11.7 13.3 x x x x x x x x x x | 19.00
RP | 63.6 | x x x x x x x x 32.7 15.6 [B]36.6[/B] 7.7 7.4 x x x x x x x x x x x | 17.42
Pr | 66.9 | x x x x x x 28.9 14.5 [B]37.1[/B] 8.8 10.7 x x x x x x x x x x x x x | 15.58
SL | 18.5 | [B]53.4[/B] 19.7 22.0 3.5 1.3 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x | 6.79
[b]Bold[/b] is each team's most likely outcome.
0.0 means the outcome occurred, but is less than 0.05% likely to occur.
x means the outcome never occurred and is likely impossible.Playoff Matchups:
Code:
| Da Br Un Cg RP Pr SL | BYE
------------------------------------------------------
Cr | x x x x x x 0.3 | 99.7
Qu | x x x x x x 3.6 | 96.3
Ha | x x x x x x 0.7 | 99.3
Ck | x x x x 0.0 0.0 6.9 | 93.1
Ya | x x 0.7 0.6 7.9 12.6 67.2 | 10.9
Da | x 4.4 16.1 36.9 25.9 16.0 | 0.6
Br | x 5.8 6.7 25.5 56.4 5.3 | NO
Un | x x 49.7 15.4 3.8 x | NO
Cg | x 0.3 15.8 6.8 1.1 x | NO
RP | x x 4.4 2.9 0.2 x | NO
Pr | x x 0.0 x x x | NO
SL | x x x x x x | NO
Hosts on the left, visitors across the top.
Last edited:
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
In a four way tie between Dartmouth, Brown, Colgate, and Union:
Dartmouth would have 3-5 points (assume 3 points since they'd have to lose both games for this to happen)
Brown has 9 points
Colgate has 5 points
Union would have 5-7 points (assume 7 for the same reasoning as before)
That would indeed put Dartmouth in 9th.
In a four way tie between Dartmouth, Brown, Colgate, and Union:
Dartmouth would have 3-5 points (assume 3 points since they'd have to lose both games for this to happen)
Brown has 9 points
Colgate has 5 points
Union would have 5-7 points (assume 7 for the same reasoning as before)
That would indeed put Dartmouth in 9th.
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
That's what I had too. I'm pretty sure Brown is capped at 5th since they didn't do well against the teams near them, but I didn't try very hard to get them over.
That's what I had too. I'm pretty sure Brown is capped at 5th since they didn't do well against the teams near them, but I didn't try very hard to get them over.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Brown's cap is 25. They would have to tie with CCT; Yale and/or Dartmouth could be involved.
Brown took 0 points on Clarkson, 0 on Yale, and 4 on Dartmouth.
Clarkson took 2 on Dartmouth, which would then place them above Brown on any sort of tiebreak (minimum of 6 points between tied teams).
Out of curiosity, what tiebreaks did you get Dartmouth in? I assume a three-way with Yale? CCT would take H/H on ECAC wins.
Brown's cap is 25. They would have to tie with CCT; Yale and/or Dartmouth could be involved.
Brown took 0 points on Clarkson, 0 on Yale, and 4 on Dartmouth.
Clarkson took 2 on Dartmouth, which would then place them above Brown on any sort of tiebreak (minimum of 6 points between tied teams).
Out of curiosity, what tiebreaks did you get Dartmouth in? I assume a three-way with Yale? CCT would take H/H on ECAC wins.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
BTW lugnut, it seems odd your app couldn't process 4 way ties but it could do 3... procedure's the same for both; wouldn't it be easier to pass in a list (or array, but IIRC you use python) of tied teams, instead of 3 variables?
BTW lugnut, it seems odd your app couldn't process 4 way ties but it could do 3... procedure's the same for both; wouldn't it be easier to pass in a list (or array, but IIRC you use python) of tied teams, instead of 3 variables?
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
It's entirely a factor of laziness and too much hard-coding. The issue is that teams can pop out of the tie and then you have to start over and instead of doing it by logic, I explicitly coded it out for three-way ties. One day I'll make it work for n-way ties, but today is not that day.
BTW lugnut, it seems odd your app couldn't process 4 way ties but it could do 3... procedure's the same for both; wouldn't it be easier to pass in a list (or array, but IIRC you use python) of tied teams, instead of 3 variables?
It's entirely a factor of laziness and too much hard-coding. The issue is that teams can pop out of the tie and then you have to start over and instead of doing it by logic, I explicitly coded it out for three-way ties. One day I'll make it work for n-way ties, but today is not that day.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
I tried to find it on GitHub so I could put up a PR, but no such luck. I know you sent me a copy a while back; have to see if I can find it. Of course, you've probably made a lot of updates since then.
Popping teams out of the tie isn't all that difficult; that's what recursion is for.
I tried to find it on GitHub so I could put up a PR, but no such luck. I know you sent me a copy a while back; have to see if I can find it. Of course, you've probably made a lot of updates since then.
Popping teams out of the tie isn't all that difficult; that's what recursion is for.
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Midweekend update. Everyone knows whether they're staying home or heading on the road next week, but basically nothing else is set. What fun!
Simulated Final Standings (EXHAUSTIVE search of 729 possibilities):
Rank and Points breakdown:
Playoff Matchups:
Midweekend update. Everyone knows whether they're staying home or heading on the road next week, but basically nothing else is set. What fun!
Simulated Final Standings (EXHAUSTIVE search of 729 possibilities):
- Cornell
- Quinnipiac
- Harvard
- Clarkson
————— - Yale
- Brown
- Dartmouth
- Union
————— - Colgate
- RPI
- Princeton
- SLU
Rank and Points breakdown:
Code:
| KRACH | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |Avg Rk |AvgPts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 228.2 | [B]50.2[/B] 15.5 16.6 17.8 x x x x x x x x | 2.02 | 30.02
Qu | 345.0 | 28.8 [B]43.3[/B] 19.4 8.5 x x x x x x x x | 2.08 | 29.44
Ha | 226.0 | 18.1 22.9 [B]39.9[/B] 19.1 x x x x x x x x | 2.60 | 29.20
Ck | 217.5 | 2.9 18.4 24.2 [B]54.5[/B] x x x x x x x x | 3.30 | 27.98
Ya | 111.1 | x x x x [B]83.8[/B] 16.2 x x x x x x | 5.16 | 23.56
Br | 95.7 | x x x x x [B]50.0[/B] 42.3 7.7 x x x x | 6.58 | 22.11
Da | 77.7 | x x x x 16.2 27.4 [B]35.9[/B] 20.5 x x x x | 6.61 | 22.10
Un | 139.9 | x x x x x 6.4 21.8 [B]71.8[/B] x x x x | 7.65 | 20.80
Cg | 60.7 | x x x x x x x x [B]83.5[/B] 13.2 3.3 x | 9.20 | 18.47
RP | 61.3 | x x x x x x x x 10.3 44.0 [B]45.7[/B] x | 10.35 | 16.90
Pr | 73.7 | x x x x x x x x 6.1 42.8 [B]51.1[/B] x | 10.45 | 16.89
SL | 18.2 | x x x x x x x x x x x [B]100.0[/B] | 12.00 | 6.53
| KRACH | 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 |AvgPts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cr | 228.2 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 42.2 13.4 [B]44.3[/B] | 30.02
Qu | 345.0 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 21.1 13.5 [B]65.5[/B] x | 29.44
Ha | 226.0 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 33.1 13.5 [B]53.5[/B] x | 29.20
Ck | 217.5 | x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x [B]44.3[/B] 13.4 42.2 x x | 27.98
Ya | 111.1 | x x x x x x x x x x x [B]65.5[/B] 13.5 21.1 x x x x x x | 23.56
Br | 95.7 | x x x x x x x x x 37.6 13.5 [B]48.9[/B] x x x x x x x x | 22.11
Da | 77.7 | x x x x x x x x x 38.2 13.5 [B]48.4[/B] x x x x x x x x | 22.10
Un | 139.9 | x x x x x x x x [B]53.5[/B] 13.5 33.1 x x x x x x x x x | 20.80
Cg | 60.7 | x x x x x 20.0 13.5 [B]66.6[/B] x x x x x x x x x x x x | 18.47
RP | 61.3 | x x x x [B]48.4[/B] 13.5 38.2 x x x x x x x x x x x x x | 16.90
Pr | 73.7 | x x x x [B]48.9[/B] 13.5 37.6 x x x x x x x x x x x x x | 16.89
SL | 18.2 | [B]66.6[/B] 13.5 20.0 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x | 6.53
[b]Bold[/b] is each team's most likely outcome.
0.0 means the outcome occurred, but fewer than 500 times.
x means the outcome never occurred.
A blank space means the outcome is impossible.Playoff Matchups:
Code:
| Cg RP Pr SL | BYE
------------------------------------
Ya | x 16.2 x [B]83.8[/B] | NO
Br | 10.8 16.7 [B]72.5[/B] x | NO
Da | 20.6 [B]47.4[/B] 15.7 16.2 | NO
Un | [B]68.5[/B] 19.7 11.8 x | NO
Hosts on the left, visitors across the top.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
The regular season is over, but this thread isn't!
It's time for playoffs! In the first round, all four top seeds are favored, though Brown-Princeton is basically a toss-up. Moving forward, Union is the only non-bye team that is likely to threaten their quarterfinal opponent. Quinnipiac has 3:2 odds to win the tournament and will likely have a relatively easy road to the semis. The other three bye teams all have basically even odds to join Quinnipiac in the final. All of that said, there's a reason we play the games. Let's see what happens!
Summary:
Future Round Matchups:
NOTE: I think I blanked out all of the right values, but I might have screwed that one up.
The regular season is over, but this thread isn't!
It's time for playoffs! In the first round, all four top seeds are favored, though Brown-Princeton is basically a toss-up. Moving forward, Union is the only non-bye team that is likely to threaten their quarterfinal opponent. Quinnipiac has 3:2 odds to win the tournament and will likely have a relatively easy road to the semis. The other three bye teams all have basically even odds to join Quinnipiac in the final. All of that said, there's a reason we play the games. Let's see what happens!
Summary:
Code:
KRACH | 1st QF SF F
Qu | 355.8 | 100 [B]92.9[/B] [B]65.3[/B] [B]41.1[/B]
Cr | 226.9 | 100 [B]73.6[/B] [B]39.9[/B] 18.2
Ck | 218.7 | 100 [B]72.3[/B] 37.4 16.7
Ha | 202.9 | 100 [B]78.8[/B] 34.4 15.8
Da | 82.3 | [B]89.0[/B] 17.9 4.4 1.2
Ya | 106.5 | [B]71.8[/B] 18.2 5.3 1.7
Un | 151.2 | [B]82.9[/B] 29.6 9.7 4.2
Br | 87.8 | [B]53.5[/B] 7.8 1.8 0.6
Pr | 79.9 | 46.5 5.9 1.3 0.4
Cg | 54.0 | 17.1 1.1 0.2 0.0
RP | 57.4 | 28.2 1.7 0.3 0.1
SL | 21.4 | 11.0 0.1 0.0 0.0Future Round Matchups:
Code:
QF| Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 28.4 24.6 10.9 25.1 11.0
Cr | 53.0 20.5 17.8 5.6 3.1
Ck | 63.9 27.4 4.4 3.8 0.5
Ha | 89.0 7.9 2.6 0.3 0.3
SF| Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 38.9 8.6 11.2 25.4 4.5 3.5 0.6 0.3
Cr | 49.5 15.1 3.3 0.6 0.2 1.9 1.4 0.4 1.1 0.1
Ck | 16.9 4.0 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
Ha | 4.5 2.7 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0
Da | 1.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Ya | 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Un | 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Br | 0.0 0.0 x
Pr | 0.0 0.0 x
Cg | x x
F| Cr Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 25.0 23.6 12.7 1.7 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cr | 1.5 8.8 1.0 1.7 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
Ck | 7.5 0.9 0.1 2.7 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0
Ha | 1.0 3.1 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0
Da | 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Ya | 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Un | 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
Br | 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pr | 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cg | 0.0 x
RP | 0.0
0.0 denotes outcomes that occurred fewer than 500 times in the simulation.
x denotes outcomes that are possible but did not occur.
Blanks denote impossible outcomes.NOTE: I think I blanked out all of the right values, but I might have screwed that one up.
Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Game one is in the books and everything is going chalk so far. There's about a 2/3 chance that all four series do indeed go chalk, though not necessarily tonight. I guess I could calculate that pretty easily but I'm not gonna.
Summary:
Future Round Matchups:
Game one is in the books and everything is going chalk so far. There's about a 2/3 chance that all four series do indeed go chalk, though not necessarily tonight. I guess I could calculate that pretty easily but I'm not gonna.
Summary:
Code:
KRACH | 1st QF SF F
Qu | 353.3 | 100 [B]90.5[/B] [B]63.1[/B] [B]39.7[/B]
Cr | 227.5 | 100 [B]66.9[/B] 36.5 16.8
Ck | 217.4 | 100 [B]71.6[/B] [B]37.4[/B] 16.9
Ha | 203.6 | 100 [B]78.7[/B] 35.3 16.2
Da | 85.0 | [B]96.2[/B] 20.1 5.2 1.4
Ya | 112.6 | [B]89.1[/B] 24.2 7.5 2.5
Un | 157.4 | [B]93.8[/B] 34.5 11.4 5.2
Br | 95.0 | [B]80.8[/B] 10.8 3.0 1.1
Pr | 74.2 | 19.2 1.8 0.4 0.1
Cg | 51.9 | 6.2 0.3 0.1 0.0
RP | 55.3 | 10.9 0.6 0.1 0.0
SL | 20.5 | 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0Future Round Matchups:
Code:
QF| Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 65.0 15.4 5.3 10.5 3.8
Cr | 80.5 14.7 3.5 0.8 0.4
Ck | 85.8 13.0 1.0 0.2 0.0
Ha | 96.2 3.4 0.4 0.0 0.0
SF| Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 34.0 8.6 13.9 30.1 3.1 0.6 0.1 0.0
Cr | 43.2 13.7 3.4 0.3 0.0 4.8 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.0
Ck | 20.4 5.4 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0
Ha | 7.0 2.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Da | 1.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ya | 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Un | 0.0 0.0 0.0 x
Br | 0.0 x x
Pr | 0.0 x x
Cg | x x
F| Cr Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br Pr Cg RP SL
Qu | 22.3 22.6 13.5 2.1 2.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 x
Cr | 1.8 8.2 1.1 2.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ck | 6.8 1.0 0.1 4.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ha | 1.4 4.1 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Da | 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ya | 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Un | 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0
Br | 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pr | 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cg | 0.0 x
RP | x
0.0 denotes outcomes that occurred fewer than 500 times in the simulation.
x denotes outcomes that are possible but did not occur.
Blanks denote impossible outcomes.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Dartmouth emphatically shut down SLU yesterday, putting an end to a fairly uninteresting first round. As we would expect, all four home teams are predicted to advance, though Cornell is only a 5-in-8 favorite thanks to their unlucky draw of Union. As such, there is about a 1-in-3 chance that all four series once again go chalk. Looking forward, Quinnipiac is still about a 40% favorite to win the Whitelaw.
Summary:
Future Round Matchups:
Dartmouth emphatically shut down SLU yesterday, putting an end to a fairly uninteresting first round. As we would expect, all four home teams are predicted to advance, though Cornell is only a 5-in-8 favorite thanks to their unlucky draw of Union. As such, there is about a 1-in-3 chance that all four series once again go chalk. Looking forward, Quinnipiac is still about a 40% favorite to win the Whitelaw.
Summary:
Code:
KRACH | QF SF F
Qu | 354.7 | [B]87.4[/B] [B]60.4[/B] [B]38.1[/B]
Cr | 228.0 | [B]62.5[/B] 34.2 15.9
Ck | 218.0 | [B]71.7[/B] [B]37.8[/B] 17.1
Ha | 203.0 | [B]81.0[/B] 36.9 17.0
Da | 78.8 | 19.0 4.8 1.2
Ya | 118.2 | 28.3 9.2 3.2
Un | 162.5 | 37.5 12.7 6.0
Br | 101.1 | 12.6 4.0 1.5Future Round Matchups:
Code:
SF| Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br
Qu | 31.7 7.5 15.5 32.8
Cr | 39.1 12.6 2.9 7.9
Ck | 23.6 5.5 3.4
Ha | 9.3 2.7 1.1
Da | 2.2 0.7 0.3
Ya | 1.3
F| Cr Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br
Qu | 20.1 21.9 14.0 1.9 2.6
Cr | 2.2 8.2 1.0 2.8
Ck | 6.7 0.8 5.3 1.0
Ha | 1.8 4.8 1.5
Da | 0.2 0.7 0.2
Ya | 1.2 0.5
Un | 0.8
0.0 denotes outcomes that occurred fewer than 500 times in the simulation.
x denotes outcomes that are possible but did not occur.
Blanks denote impossible outcomes.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
Mid-weekend update. We have a new favorite!
Summary:
Future Round Matchups:
Mid-weekend update. We have a new favorite!
Summary:
Code:
KRACH | QF SF F
Qu | 316.0 | [B]54.5[/B] 34.8 20.8
Cr | 209.4 | 29.6 16.6 7.8
Ck | 229.1 | [B]89.1[/B] [B]51.4[/B] [B]26.3[/B]
Ha | 212.1 | [B]93.1[/B] [B]46.9[/B] 23.6
Da | 76.3 | 6.9 1.9 0.5
Ya | 113.2 | 10.9 3.9 1.4
Un | 175.6 | [B]70.4[/B] 29.2 13.9
Br | 112.6 | 45.5 15.3 5.7Future Round Matchups:
Code:
SF| Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br
Qu | 13.3 1.0 1.8 38.4
Cr | 14.4 1.7 0.1 13.5
Ck | 43.0 3.2 28.5
Ha | 5.3 26.6 3.2
Da | 0.4 2.0 0.2
Ya | 3.5
F| Cr Ck Ha Da Ya Un Br
Qu | 4.9 16.4 12.1 0.5 1.0
Cr | 4.2 6.6 0.3 0.6
Ck | 12.5 0.5 15.5 2.2
Ha | 1.1 7.6 7.0
Da | 0.0 0.3 0.3
Ya | 0.5 0.7
Un | 5.2
0.0 denotes outcomes that occurred fewer than 500 times in the simulation.
x denotes outcomes that are possible but did not occur.
Blanks denote impossible outcomes.Re: ECAC Projected Standings 2018-19
I really dislike every team left, but I'm going to pull for maximum chaos and a Brown title.
Summary:
Finals Matchups:
I really dislike every team left, but I'm going to pull for maximum chaos and a Brown title.
Summary:
Code:
KRACH | SF F
Cr | 236.2 | [B]65.8[/B] [B]33.2[/B]
Ck | 241.5 | [B]52.1[/B] 29.1
Ha | 222.3 | 47.9 25.9
Br | 122.5 | 34.2 11.8Finals Matchups:
Code:
F| Ck Ha Br
Cr | 34.3 31.5
Ck | 17.8
Ha | 16.4