What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Clarkson 2-0
RPI 2-0
Colgate 2-1
Union 2-1

I can't pick against Gate.
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Nate Owen USCHO

Clarkson 2-1
RPI 2-0
Dartmouth 2-0
Cornell 2-1
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

The stats with 40 contestants:<pre>
5-12 Winner % 2-0 2-1
Clark 38 95.00% 31 7
Prin 2 5.00% 1 1
6-11
RPI 32 80.00% 14 18
Bron 8 20.00% 0 8
7-10
Dart 29 72.50% 8 21
Colg 11 27.50% 2 9
8-9
Corn 15 37.50% 4 11
Unon 25 62.50% 4 21
</pre>
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Ralph Baer said:
Vic if you are adding media picks, here are Ken Schott's .......
Click to expand...

Sorry Ralph but Ken Schott does not allow anything he writes to be used in any media or contests unless you bow down and kiss his U know what by asking for his permission. Please remove his information from this thread. Thanks.

Anyway, they are not even in the right order so that disqualifies them ;) .
 
Last edited:
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

vicb said:
Sorry Ralph but Ken Schott does not allow anything he writes to be used in any media or contests unless you bow down and kiss his U know what by asking for his permission. Please remove his information from this thread. Thanks.

Anyway, they are not even in the right order so that disqualifies them ;) .
Click to expand...

Sorry.
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

The final stats with 42 contestants:
<pre>
5-12 Winner % 2-0 2-1
Clark 40 95.24% 33 7
Princ 2 4.76% 1 1
6-11
RPI 34 80.95% 16 18
Brn 8 19.05% 0 8
7-10
Dart 31 73.81% 8 23
Colg 11 26.19% 2 9
8-9
Corn 17 40.48% 4 13
Unin 25 59.52% 4 21
</pre>
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

We have a 4 way tie at the top after Round 1. Here are the standings
<pre>
Contestant First Rnd
1 47 Brett Gobe 15
48 cudmud 15
15 Kepler 15
36 Muskieman 15
5 30 DrDemento 14
12 FreshFish 14
14 GoldenBear 14
29 JennyRN 14
39 QU2201 14
38 TchrBill 14
11 23 fr.Joe 13
5 goldenbriggsy 13
37 hockeyplayer2015 13
11 kdiff77 13
34 Laker Dude 13
42 Nate Owen USCHO 13
6 Ralph Baer 13
18 20 97osu 12
18 BobNY 12
3 bothman 12
31 DeepRed72 12
25 hawthr 12
32 lugnut92 12
35 Mike Hutter 12
25 7 Dutchman 11
26 Go Puckman 11
33 jstadts 11
21 LTsatch 11
19 slumulva88 11
41 sshablak 11
22 Vaportrail 11
32 8 aweise 10
16 drshoen 10
13 engineerhockeyfan 10
28 Rainman 10
9 Saints#1 10
10 StayPuftMMcu 10
38 2 ColSkate65 9
4 FlagDUDE08 9
43 vicb 9
41 40 Rjm7272 7
42 17 Ufan 2
</pre>
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

For the current standings see my post before this one.

OK Round 2 is ready for action. Round 2 is played EXACTLY LIKE Round 1.

You get a point for picking the correct winner of the series and a point for each correct total wins for each team. Max 2nd round point total per series is 4.

If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick them to win 2-0 you get 4 points, 1 for RPI as the winner, 2 for each RPI win and 1 for picking Harvard to not win a game.
If RPI wins 2-1 and you pick them to win 2-0 you get 3 points
If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick Harvard to win 2-1 you get 1 point
If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick Harvard to win 2-0 you get 0 points.

So here are the 2nd round matchups: PLEASE KEEP YOUR PICKS IN THIS EXACT ORDER AS IT IS EASIER FOR ME TO ENTER THESE IN MY EXCEL SPREAD SHEET TO KEEP SCORE.

#8 Cornell at #1 Quinnipiac
#7 Dartmouth at #2 Yale
#6 RPI at #3 Harvard
#5 Clarkson at #4 SLU

Example Pick

Quinnipiac 2-1
Yale 2-0
Harvard 2-0
Clarkson 2-1

You have until 7PM Friday night to get your picks in. Good luck.
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Quinnipiac 2-0
Yale 2-1
Harvard 2-0
SLU 2-1

Does anyone else feel like the league is too predictable this year?
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Saints#1 said:
No! LOL ... Well, I guess maybe compared to some years! ;)
Click to expand...

Well, each of the higher-ranked seeds won in the first round, and only one of the series went to three games. The Clarkson-SLU series is probably a total toss-up (it should be a blast), but other than that, I can't see any upsets in the quarterfinals. In previous years, I remember most matchups being completely up-in-the-air!
 
Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

kdiff77 said:
Well, each of the higher-ranked seeds won in the first round, and only one of the series went to three games. The Clarkson-SLU series is probably a total toss-up (it should be a blast), but other than that, I can't see any upsets in the quarterfinals. In previous years, I remember most matchups being completely up-in-the-air!
Click to expand...

This is true! Although, the teams with the bye have typically fared better than those without the bye over the years. It makes earning that bye that much more important.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top