Re: Ecac East 2009/2010
# 6 Umass Boston = You state "Poor Coaching " . You sure you didn''t mix up #1 and # 6 ? Boy , how you forget quickly ! Seems to me Umass Boston I recall the number 8 seed last year knocked off your great coach in round 1 . And I would have to say Norwich surely had the talent over Umass ! Now that's Poor Coaching !!! Coach Belisle has come along way with the UMass program in the last three years , where as others with superior talent have
come far short of there expectations ! That's how you should evaluate a coach .
Final Standing and Thoughts
1. Norwich = Great Coach, great Frosh Fwds, and tradition wins the league again!
2. Castleton = Same thing above except they are starting a tradition and Coach Todd is getting better Norwich gets them by a point again.
3. Babson = Post season success all year long Coach Rice is very good
4. NEC = European flavor is tough to prepare for
5. Skidmore = System is in place will be a solid performer
6. Umass Boston = Poor coaching but has some very good talent
7. SME = Big losses from last years team not replaced
8. St. Anselm = Good Freshmen and Solid goalies will be competitive all year
9. St. Mikes = Need to go D-III
10. UNE = Will be much better than most think
# 6 Umass Boston = You state "Poor Coaching " . You sure you didn''t mix up #1 and # 6 ? Boy , how you forget quickly ! Seems to me Umass Boston I recall the number 8 seed last year knocked off your great coach in round 1 . And I would have to say Norwich surely had the talent over Umass ! Now that's Poor Coaching !!! Coach Belisle has come along way with the UMass program in the last three years , where as others with superior talent have
come far short of there expectations ! That's how you should evaluate a coach .