What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

FadeToBlack&Gold said:
Thanks for triggering my PDS.
Click to expand...

I wasn't entirely sure what PDS stood for so I googled it. The fifth possible match on the first page was "penile Doppler study". Just thought you'd want to know.


Edit: I realized what it meant as soon as I started typing this reply. :D :o
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Kepler said:
She's the personification of a cognitive deficiency.

The stupid are too stupid to know they are stupid.
Click to expand...

I used to think she was kind of brilliant in a sense. She stuck her nose into politics just enough to cash in. Then she made a dash for the vault and a quick exit from politics. It was brilliantly timed. Or so I thought. Well, maybe that's still true, but now she's causing more damage than her entertainment value. People actually believe her. A lot of people.

She may be smarter than the character she may be playing, but it's getting harder for me to believe that. She's a useless idiot.
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

dxmnkd316 said:
I used to think she was kind of brilliant in a sense. She stuck her nose into politics just enough to cash in. Then she made a dash for the vault and a quick exit from politics. It was brilliantly timed. Or so I thought. Well, maybe that's still true, but now she's causing more damage than her entertainment value. People actually believe her. A lot of people.

She may be smarter than the character she may be playing, but it's getting harder for me to believe that. She's a useless idiot.
Click to expand...

I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume she's not good with money. There's a sucker born every minute, although that's a slight exaggeration of Bristol's fecundity.
 
Today in I needed a laugh:

Someone went on Gaiam (yoga workouts) Facebook page to complain that their yoga mat is made of chemicals.
 
ShirtlessBob said:
Not at birth. If you want to get cut when you're aware, then by all means.
Click to expand...

Disagree. Parents make all sorts of decisions for their kids, medically and otherwise, that have long lasting if not permanent effects. If my kid ends up being a boy, he's getting circumcised. He won't remember a thing and he'll be at less risk for UTIs and STDs down the road.
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

unofan said:
Disagree. Parents make all sorts of decisions for their kids, medically and otherwise, that have long lasting if not permanent effects. If my kid ends up being a boy, he's getting circumcised. He won't remember a thing and he'll be at less risk for UTIs and STDs down the road.
Click to expand...

I'm a little suspect on the UTI risk justification. Ear tubes are a similarly routine procedure and similarly reduce the risk of infections, but we don't have those put in before infections actually develop into a problem. I suspect the main difference is little more than the lack of historical baggage.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

unofan said:
Disagree. Parents make all sorts of decisions for their kids, medically and otherwise, that have long lasting if not permanent effects. If my kid ends up being a boy, he's getting circumcised. He won't remember a thing and he'll be at less risk for UTIs and STDs down the road.
Click to expand...

Far more importantly, without that snip he'll be getting far fewer blow jobs. Girls aren't fans of peeling the banana.
 
Re: Dr. Clayton Forrester's Science Roundup

Kepler said:
Far more importantly, without that snip he'll be getting far fewer blow jobs. Girls aren't fans of peeling the banana.
Click to expand...

Eurotrash girls aren't fans of Americans who've given the pip the snip. They think it's weird and, in some circles, I think there's a latent anti-Semitism to their preference.

The preference all depends upon from which land you hail. With modern hygiene there's no real greater risk for UTIs in the boy, so long as he's taught, like any child taking shop, to properly clean his tool. As to STDs, I can't speak to that, but it should be covered with a jimmy hat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top